Vetoing children's health care?

But in the case of the president's planned veto of the S-CHIP (the State Children's Health Insurance Program) the "obvious" storyline is 100 percent wrong. In fact, this is one of those strange cases where folks at the U.S. Bishops' Conference might actually applaud a president's veto of a children's health-insurance bill.

Both the U.S. bishops and President Bush once supported the S-CHIP -- but now have raised significant questions about it. That's because a new Congress has transformed this welfare reform into a Trojan horse.

The S-CHIP provides needed health care to many children -- that's why it is such a grave scandal that congressional leaders have tried to redirect it. They decided a children's health bill would be the best place to set a dangerous precedent by taking dollars from U.S. taxpayers' paychecks and using them to pay for abortions.

The S-CHIP debate is filled with paradoxes, but it isn't so mysterious after all.

The program was created in 1997, when welfare reform was all the rage. It was only a few years earlier that President Clinton vowed to "end welfare as we know it," and the Republican Congress gave him a way to do so -- preserving the benefits of welfare while slicing off some of the waste.

The concept was simple and significant, both at once.

Instead of spending federal money on the poor from Washington, D.C., where the agencies distributing the money are far away from those who need it, money would be sent in block grants to the states. Not only would this approach be more efficient, it would guarantee that more of the money we contribute in taxes would actually reach needy people. Less would be spent on middlemen and red tape.

When the chairman of the U.S. House Ways & Means Committee, Bill Archer, went into welfare-reform hearings in 1994, he was armed with papal documents citing the principle of subsidiarity.

Yes, federal money should be spent on the poor, he said, but it should be paid out at the state level, because those closest to a situation are the best equipped to address it.

Both parties united to pass the legislation, and Clinton signed it.

This was in the days before the phrase "compassionate conservatism" became a campaign slogan for George Bush. Christian professor and publisher Marvin Olasky coined the term to describe just this kind of policy: one that paired our desire for charity with our need for pragmatism regarding our money.

The S-CHIP came from a later Congress, after the first wave of welfare reform, but it shared that principle: Federal money would be distributed by the states. S-CHIP money was to be spent providing health care to children whose parents were above the poverty line and didn't qualify for Medicaid, yet couldn't afford health care.

So why is it being vetoed now? Because when the Congress changed hands in 2005, new legislators were put in charge, and they decided to make two significant changes in the S-CHIP program.

First, lawmakers changed the definition of "children." Republicans had made sure the previous S-CHIP program defined children as anyone "from conception to age 19." That meant that pre-natal care was available to pregnant woman -- for the sake of the children. The new Congress removed that definition.

Second, lawmakers added "pregnancy services" to the bill. Through this program, money withheld from your paycheck for taxes could now end up in the paycheck of an abortionist living in one of 17 states.

The old version of the S-CHIP used language that appeared in the Unborn Victims of Violence Act and the Fetal Pain Act. Together, these pieces of legislation made a compelling case, in federal law, that unborn children had rights, too. The new version of the S-CHIP reverses that gain.

The old version of the S-CHIP honored our nation's longstanding federal policies against taxpayer-funded abortions. The new version of the S-CHIP makes an end-run around those policies.

The old version of the S-CHIP ensured that as much of our welfare expenditures as possible actually helped serve poor children. The new version ensures that as much of our taxpayer money as currently possible goes to fund abortions.

The old version of the S-CHIP had broad-based bipartisan support and the support of the U.S. bishops. The new version has the support of Planned Parenthood -- and raised the ire of the bishops' pro-life expert, Richard Doerflinger.

The old version of the S-CHIP was a very good thing. The veto of the new version of the S-CHIP is a very good thing -- and it shows how crucially important it is that we have a pro-life president.

Contact

National Catholic Register
http://www.ncregister.com ,
- ,

Email

Keywords

More Catholic PRWire

Showing 1 - 50 of 4,716

• « Prev
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• Next »

A Recession Antidote
Randy Hain

Monaco & The Vatican: Monaco's Grace Kelly Exhibit to Rome--A Review of Monegasque-Holy See Diplomatic History
Dna. Maria St. Catherine Sharpe, t.o.s.m., T.O.SS.T.

The Why of Jesus' Death: A Pauline Perspective
Jerom Paul

A Royal Betrayal: Catholic Monaco Liberalizes Abortion
Dna. Maria St.Catherine De Grace Sharpe, t.o.s.m., T.O.SS.T.

Embrace every moment as sacred time
Mary Regina Morrell

My Dad
JoMarie Grinkiewicz

Letting go is simple wisdom with divine potential
Mary Regina Morrell

Father Lombardi's Address on Catholic Media
Catholic Online

Pope's Words to Pontifical Latin American College
Catholic Online

Prelate: Genetics Needs a Conscience
Catholic Online

State Aid for Catholic Schools: Help or Hindrance?
Catholic Online

Scorsese Planning Movie on Japanese Martyrs
Catholic Online

2 Nuns Kidnapped in Kenya Set Free
Catholic Online

Holy See-Israel Negotiation Moves Forward
Catholic Online

Franchising to Evangelize
Catholic Online

Catholics Decry Anti-Christianity in Israel
Catholic Online

Pope and Gordon Brown Meet About Development Aid
Catholic Online

Pontiff Backs Latin America's Continental Mission
Catholic Online

Cardinal Warns Against Anti-Catholic Education
Catholic Online

Full Circle
Robert Gieb

Three words to a deeper faith
Paul Sposite

Relections for Lent 2009
chris anthony

Wisdom lies beyond the surface of life
Mary Regina Morrell

World Food Program Director on Lent
Catholic Online

Moral Clarity
DAN SHEA

Pope's Lenten Message for 2009
Catholic Online

A Prayer for Monaco: Remembering the Faith Legacy of Prince Rainier III & Princess Grace and Contemplating the Moral Challenges of Prince Albert II
Dna. Maria St. Catherine Sharpe

Keeping a Lid on Permissiveness
Sally Connolly

Glimpse of Me
Sarah Reinhard

The 3 stages of life
Michele Szekely

Sex and the Married Woman
Cheryl Dickow

A Catholic Woman Returns to the Church
Cheryl Dickow

Modernity & Morality
Dan Shea

Just a Minute
Sarah Reinhard

Catholic identity ... triumphant reemergence!
Hugh McNichol

Edging God Out
Paul Sposite

Burying a St. Joseph Statue
Cheryl Dickow

George Bush Speaks on Papal Visit
Catholic Online

Sometimes moving forward means moving the canoe
Mary Regina Morrell

Action Changes Things: Teaching our Kids about Community Service
Lisa Hendey

Easter... A Way of Life
Paul Spoisite

Papal initiative...peace and harmony!
Hugh McNichol

Proclaim the mysteries of the Resurrection!
Hugh McNichol

Jerusalem Patriarch's Easter Message
Catholic Online

Good Friday Sermon of Father Cantalamessa
Catholic Online

Papal Address at the End of the Way of the Cross
Catholic Online

Cardinal Zen's Meditations for Via Crucis
Catholic Online

Interview With Vatican Aide on Jewish-Catholic Relations
Catholic Online

Pope Benedict XVI On the Easter Triduum
Catholic Online

Holy Saturday...anticipation!
Hugh McNichol

• « Prev
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• Next »