Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Dr. Frederick Liewehr

10/9/2013 (2 years ago)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

How did we get to this point?

Ultimately then, in order to be a progressive one must be an atheist. Without a belief in a moral code that is of divine origin, the progressive cannot logically justify his belief in "fairness", "human rights", or any of the other ideals he claims to espouse. Morality becomes simply a matter of opinion, and all opinions are equally valid. However, that position is untenable because he might get his nose punched, so he must substitute coercion, enforcement of his arbitrary new code, in order that people with varying opinions obey his precepts and become subordinate to his will.  He must be in favor of hate speech laws, censorship of writing and the Internet, the "fairness" doctrine, marginalization of those who do not share progressive views, mandatory "sensitivity training", and so forth. Does this sound familiar?

Highlights

By Dr. Frederick Liewehr

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

10/9/2013 (2 years ago)

Published in U.S.

Keywords: transactional analysis, progressivism, relativism, morality, culture war, Dr. Frederick Liewehr


RICHMOND,VA (Catholic Online) - During the past fifty or so years we have seen an increasing secularization of our society, and that of the entire West, which has dramatically escalated during the Obama administration. We are seeing basic tenets of not just Christian faith, but of reality itself, being questioned, such as how many "genders" are there, and whether they may be altered.  The idea of the institution of marriage between a man and a woman being the optimum arrangement for a healthy society built on the nuclear family is being actively condemned and indeed voicing that opinion now comes under the 1984ish label of "hate speech" which is punishable by law.

How did we get to this point? The answer in part is in the 1967 book by Thomas Harris, MD entitled, "I'm OK, You're OK." The book is a pop psychological explanation of Transactional Analysis, and posits that there are three mental states between which a person can switch - child, parent, and adult. The child is mostly an emotional state, with memories of reactions to events not well understood when one was young, which can affect later thinking, such as an irrational fear of dogs, or a constructive fear of putting one's hand on a red hot stove burner. The parent state is thinking dominated by bits of "tape recordings" of admonitions and rules that the child learned. The adult, and supposedly desirable state, results from testing of the parental rules and childhood emotions to form your own opinions and code of conduct.

The problem with this thinking is that it considers the parental state as oppressive and arbitrary. Adults are urged to go beyond what are considered "simplistic" mores and find their own solutions. Instead of the child thinking, "I'm not OK, but you are OK" and modeling his behavior accordingly, he is encouraged to think, "I'm OK, and you're OK", and substitute his own ideas for those of his parents, society, or the Church. This of course is only possible if one believes in moral relativism, where what I believe and what you believe are equally valid.

The concept of relativism has at least two problems. First, one group of "progressives" thinks that two men should be "married" and allowed to adopt children, and the result will be normal, well-adjusted children. Traditional Christians on the other hand think that marriage between two men is absurd and would lack the complementarity of a husband-wife relationship along with the maternal instincts of the mother, the role modeling that heterosexual parents provide, etc., the result of which would be children who are terribly confused and who have a much higher likelihood of having future problems such as emotional illness, with greater incidence of substance abuse and suicide, among other issues. For relativism to be valid, one would have to contend that the entire matter makes no difference one way or the other. From the passion exhibited on both sides of the argument that is obviously not the case.

The other problem is that the contention itself is not logically valid.  Progressives and traditional Christians cannot hold opposing views and both be right, anymore that Christians and Muslims or Buddhists can have different ideas of God and both be correct. It is a logical impossibility.

The contention of the relativists is that there is no absolute standard of right and wrong, and that the standard society uses is "evolving". The Christian contention is that there is in fact an absolute standard and it is written by God on our hearts. The relativists often point to the horrible torture and murders that have occurred and continue to occur and say that clearly there is no moral standard by which all societies operate. Upon closer examination, however, this is easily shown not to be true.

Even in societies that subscribed to cannibalism, the act was committed against enemies, and after lengthy rituals. They did not simply roast one of their children for dinner. Similarly when we see the horrific YouTube videos of some Muslim "rebel" eating the heart of some poor victim, it is someone who he has dehumanized through his Islamic beliefs, not his best friend. Murder is always considered wrong, when it is understood to be murder. What societies do is to delude themselves that what they are doing is not murder, which is what we in our abortion-centric society have done. We are not killing babies; we are promoting "women's health".

A better way to see the universality of absolute standards, which are collectively called "Natural Law", is not to look at someone's actions, but rather to look at their reactions. As a simple experiment, when a relativist tells you that there is no absolute standard of morality, and such things are simply "potato - potahto" issues, punch him in the nose. When he recovers, he will ask why you did that to him, and tell you that it was wrong and unfair. Why would that be so, if there is no absolute standard? What does "unfair" mean? Or, to use the favorite word of the pro-aborts, punching him in the nose was simply your "choice". What's the big deal?

Obviously this hyperbolic example is not something to be tried at home, as the TV ads say, but the point is obvious. We all know that to punch someone in the nose for no reason is wrong. Again, there is no culture where you can walk up to someone and punch him in the nose and not expect a strong protest at minimum, and probably worse. Therefore, there is a moral law. So where did it come from?

Laws do not magically appear on the books. Even in the only one case that I can think of where that occurred, the tablets given to Moses on Mt. Sinai, those Commandments had a law Prescriber - God. The moral law is God's standard that is written on our hearts, because we are made in His image. As St. Paul says in Romans 2: 14ff, "For when the Gentiles who do not have the law by nature observe the prescriptions of the law, they are a law for themselves even though they do not have the law. They show that the demands of the law are written in their hearts."

Relativism, however, is a weak man's position. Progressives always use "tolerance" to introduce their wrong thinking. Initially, they claim that there is no absolute morality, and that their ideas are as valid as those that have been held for millennia and that are God-given. Eventually, however, as acceptance increases (and more rapidly if they are able to secure the coercive power of the government) they move on to substituting their own supposed "moral code", and enforcing it. At this point "right", such as a woman's "right" to an abortion and homosexuals' "right" to marry suddenly spring forth from nowhere. These newly-discovered rights are based on some notion of "fairness". If you do not agree with their new "moral code", then you are a "hater". Thus in some perverse logical twist Christians who follow the precepts of a loving God who gave us rules in order that we might flourish as His people are suddenly transformed into demons, at least in the eyes of the Left.

Relativists clearly have a notion of right and wrong. Ask them about the racism and genocide of a Hitler or other criminal despot, and they will rail against it. They believe firmly that this sort of behavior should not be allowed, and their promotion of hate speech legislation and their constant overreaction to innocent statements shows that they believe strongly in some standards. The problem is that they have no basis for their standards. They, like all of us, have the natural law written on their hearts, but they can choose to ignore it and substitute their own "morality". So, how does one decide which laws are part of the Natural Law and which are not? Ultimately, one has two sources of information as to which position to believe.

The first source is history and culture. The idea of homosexual marriage, for example, has never existed anywhere, and didn't exist contemporaneously prior to this new "revelation" of the progressives. Marriage has always been understood as being between a man and a woman, and for the purpose of having a family and raising children. Homosexuality has always existed, but the idea of a homosexual couple being "married" is a new aberration.

The other source, of course, is the Bible. We understand the Bible as the inspired Word of God, and it is clear that marriage is a sacred covenant between and man and a woman. A question to ask those who would say that they are atheists and do not believe in God or the Bible is, "OK, you want to replace religious and cultural norms that have existed for thousands of years. What do you want to replace them with? Your opinion? Why would that be more valid?"

Ultimately then, in order to be a progressive one must be an atheist. Without a belief in a moral code that is of divine origin, the progressive cannot logically justify his belief in "fairness", "human rights", or any of the other ideals he claims to espouse. Morality becomes simply a matter of opinion, and all opinions are equally valid. However, that position is untenable because he might get his nose punched, so he must substitute coercion, enforcement of his arbitrary new code, in order that people with varying opinions obey his precepts and become subordinate to his will.  He must be in favor of hate speech laws, censorship of writing and the Internet, the "fairness" doctrine, marginalization of those who do not share progressive views, mandatory "sensitivity training", and so forth. Does this sound familiar?

----------

Dr. Frederick Liewehr is an endodontist who teaches and works in private practice. He converted from Protestantism to Catholicism in 1983, having been drawn ineluctably to Christ's Church by the light of Truth. He is a member of St. Benedict parish in Richmond, a Fourth Degree Knight of Columbus and a Cooperator of Opus Dei. 

---


Pope Francis: end world hunger through 'Prayer and Action'


Copyright 2015 - Distributed by THE CALIFORNIA NETWORK

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for February 2016
Universal:
That prisoners, especially the young, may be able to rebuild lives of dignity.
Evangelization: That married people who are separated may find welcome and support in the Christian community.



Comments


More U.S.

Center for Medical Progress releases another Planned Parenthood video despite injunction Watch

Image of Pro-life CMP stands against abortionists NAF (imgsuccess).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

After ousting illegal actions performed by Planned Parenthood clinics, the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), and its founder Daniel Daleiden, have been ordered to cease further distribution of illegally-obtained Planned Parenthood footage. Unfortunately for the ... continue reading


Huff Po Gestapo, beats down Trump, First Amendment with editorial billy club Watch

Image of Huffington Post has found a way to turn the First Amendment into a billy club for their PC police duties.

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Liberal mouthpiece, The Huffington Post (not to be confused with an actual news organization) is pandering to liberal readers by posting an addendum at the end of every story about Donald Trump. The addendum labels Trump a "racist" and a "serial liar." LOS ANGELES, CA ... continue reading


Lower Your Nets For a Catch! We Are All Called to Evangelize Watch

Image of Lower your nets for a catch

By Deacon Keith Fournier

The New Evangelization is meant to bring about an authentic renewal of the Church so that she can then undertake a new missionary outreach to the whole world. Only a Church fully alive in the Lord and filled with His Spirit can carry out such an evangelical ... continue reading


'Church ladies' finally force phony priest in Los Angeles to authorities Watch

Image of Erwin Mena  was arrested by Los Angeles police for allegedly impersonating a Roman Catholic priest and on suspicion of grand theft (Los Angeles Times).

By Mary Rezac, CNA/EWTN News

For months, Erwin Mena donned vestments, called himself "Padre," and convinced Southern California Catholics that he was a priest, police say. Los Angeles, Calif. (CNA/EWTN News) - He was good at it, too, reportedly. He attended seminary in El Salvador for a time ... continue reading


Patriarch Kirill and Pope Francis to Meet in Cuba in Historic Move of the Holy Spirit Watch

Image of Orthodox Christian Patriarch Kirill and Catholic Christian Pope Francis

By Deacon Keith Fournier

This meeting of the Primates of the Catholic Church and the Russian Orthodox Church, after a long preparation, will be the first in history and will mark an important stage in relations between the two Churches. The Holy See and the Moscow Patriarchate hope that ... continue reading


'Deeply disturbing': ANOTHER Planned Parenthood video has been released by the Center for Medical Progress (Warning: Graphic Content) Watch

Image of Yet another undercover video featuring the horrors of Planned Parenthood's illegal acts has been released (Leda Oreskovich).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

The Center for Medical Progress (CMP) released another video featuring Planned Parenthood officials casually - and even happily - discussing the revolting practice of murdering infants in the womb then mercilessly cutting them to pieces for profit. Meanwhile, after ... continue reading


Phony priest celebrated masses, funerals and performed marriages - for more than 20 years! Watch

Image of Operating out of St. Ignatius of Loyola in northeastern Los Angeles, Erwin Mena allegedly sold tickets to a pilgrimage to visit New York to see the Pope during his visit to the United States last year (Facebook).

By Catholic Online (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

He might have talked a good talk and walked a good walk, but authorities finally caught up with fifty-nine-year-old Erwin Mena, who posed as a priest for more than 20 years in Los Angeles. Mena was arrested and will enjoy a lot of time in small rooms - with bars on the ... continue reading


'Christian Refugees 2 Christian Nations, Muslim Refugees 2 Muslim Nations, That's Only Fair': Protesters rally in Missoula County Courthouse Watch

Image of Protesters stand in snow (not pictured) to stand against new influx of refugees into America (AP).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

In an effort to ease the strain on other countries who have accempted several thousand refugees, the Obama administration plans to send refugees to smaller Montana cities. Over 120 Montana citizens faced snow and ice on Monday to protest outside the Missoula County ... continue reading


Why did secret Muslim Obama visit a controversial mosque? Watch

Image of Why is Obama visiting a mosque with questionable ties?

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

President Obama is visiting a controversial mosque in Baltimore today, one that has ties to Islamic extremism. Even fellow Muslims are upset that he chose the Islamic Society of Baltimore for his visit, when he could have chosen more "moderate" mosques. LOS ANGELES, CA ... continue reading


In the minds of murderers: 9/11 began with a small question and grew to a national tragedy Watch

Image of 9/11 was based on a flight that crashed into the sea (Reuters).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

The horrific tragedy of 9/11 was reportedly started when Osama bin Laden heard of the murder-suicide on EgyptAir Flight 990. The plane's pilot crashed into the ocean, prompting bin Laden to wonder why he didn't choose to crash into a building. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic ... continue reading


All U.S. News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Subscribe to Catholic OnlineYouTube Channel

the FEED
by Catholic Online

  • MAKE YOURSELF COUNT! Complete this quick Ash Wednesday survey
  • Can you answer these four challenging questions about Lent?
  • Daily Reading for Tuesday, February 9th, 2016 HD Video
  • 10 important things to consider during Lent
  • St. Apollonia: Saint of the Day for Tuesday, February 09, 2016
  • Stations of the Cross - Series HD Video
  • Daily Readings for Tuesday, February 09, 2016

Daily Readings

Reading 1, First Kings 8:22-23, 27-30
22 Then, in the presence of the whole assembly of Israel, Solomon stood ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 84:3, 4, 5, 10, 11
3 Even the sparrow has found a home, the swallow a nest to place its ... Read More

Gospel, Mark 7:1-13
1 The Pharisees and some of the scribes who had come from Jerusalem ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for February 9th, 2016 Image

St. Apollonia
February 9: St. Apollonia, who died in the year 249, was ... Read More