Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Dr. Frederick Liewehr

11/26/2013 (1 year ago)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

Let us look at just a couple arguments against macroevolution

Our society is so blinded by political correctness, by the compulsory but erroneous and disproven dogma that passes for "knowledge", that we have become incapable of thinking or evaluating arguments. We have replaced rational discussion with jingoism and ad hominum attacks, where cries of "Racist!" or "Homophobe"" substitute for discussion. Subjects are closed; the decisions have been made by the self-anointed, and there is to be no questioning those decisions, no "hate speech" allowed. Political correctness, as taught in our schools and increasingly mandated by our government, is destroying our nation.

Highlights

By Dr. Frederick Liewehr

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

11/26/2013 (1 year ago)

Published in Politics & Policy

Keywords: evolution, macro-evolution, Darwin, political correctness, hate speech, Dr. Frederick Liewehr


RICHMOND,VA (Catholic Online) - It seems that every day we read another instance of the current administration having made grave miscalculations, or having deliberately lied about one issue or another. The latest scandal is that Obama & Co. knew perfectly well that many Americans would lose their health insurance under Obamacare, that those who could keep it would see large increases in its cost, and that few would be able to see the doctor of their choice. When one considers how the ACA is structured, this is entirely predictable, and simply another example of why Milton Freedman famously said, "There is no such thing as a free lunch", yet those who supported Obama and his plan seem to have been taken completely by surprise.


In the past, when the government was a manageable size, what it did was not a matter of grave concern on a daily basis. People could live their lives and plan for the future without considering the relentless "change" being effected by executive order, by legislation, by the courts, and by the alphabet soup of Federal agencies. Today it is a different story, and if citizens cannot discern which ideas are economically or morally sound, the wrong people will wind up in Washington.


So why do we continue to fall for schemes that have not and cannot work as promised? That voters, and often the majority of voters, are being continually duped is becoming obvious because a new term has been coined to describe these folks: "low information voters". The problem is not the intelligence, or lack of it, of the voters, but rather their lack of information. In many cases it is not only the result of a lack of information, but of disinformation that they have been fed by the schools, by the media, and by the government.


This disinformation has been labeled "political correctness", which consists of saying whatever the self-proclaimed "intelligentsia" has deemed is correct in a given circumstance, without any reference to reality. Political correctness denies the truth and is not susceptible to change due to factual errors. Errors are ignored, denied, or suppressed by the elite; the truth simply makes no difference.


Examples abound, and would serve, and have served, as the subject of countless books. I simply wish to touch upon one simple example - macroevolution.


I was reading an article in the current edition of Popular Science about a jumping spider that can jump 25 times its body length to grab its prey. That would be the equivalent of my jumping nine car lengths. I personally couldn't jump one car length even when I was young, and I don't know of many folks who could.


What intrigued me was that, according to the article, German biologists have "determined that the sticky feather-like hairs at the end of the leg, called setae, evolved from hairy pads that originally helped the spiders wrangle food." How exactly did they "determine" this? They did it by "comparing the legs of 330 species".


This is fascinating, because they did not look at an evolutionary change in these features, but rather compared a large number of contemporary species, and simply assumed this evolutionary process. This would be like looking at 100 different breeds of dogs, finding different muzzle lengths, and concluding that longer jaws are better for carrying, and indeed capturing and killing, prey, so bull dogs evolved into Dobermans.


There are many problems with that logic, of course, only one of which is that one could equally make an argument that it is the bull dog that has evolved from the Doberman, and not the other way around, perhaps because they are so adorably ugly that they are seen as less threatening to humans and thus more likely to be adopted. The point is that it is logically impossible to see "evolution" by comparing existing members of a species. Nevertheless, "evolution" must be invoked to get their "study" published.


Evolution depends for its theoretical basis on the notion of "survival of the fittest"; that is to say, members of a species are subject to random aberrations that affect their genotype, or genetic makeup, with resultant changes in their phenotype, or how that genetic makeup is realized. So dogs may randomly be born with longer or shorter muzzles. The theory postulates that dogs with the more favorable length of nose survive and the others don't. If the food bowl is very deep, for example, the dogs with the long noses can eat to the bottom, whereas the dogs with the short noses would be out of luck. While appealing, and certainly reasonable, this mechanism fails to explain why we still have both Dobermans and bulldogs. The bulldogs should have died out long ago.


The entire area of macroevolution is far too broad and complex to debunk in a short essay like this one, and nobody argues that change cannot occur within species over time, randomly or by selective breeding. That there are so many different kinds of dogs is ample testimony to that fact. The problem with evolution as it is taught is that this process, microevolution, cannot be extrapolated to inter-species macroevolution. What is needed is to look objectively at the evidence and to employ critical thinking. This skill, unfortunately, is not taught because it poses a grave danger to political correctness.


Let us look at just a couple arguments against macroevolution. The Darwinist looks at the dogs, sees what change can occur over a short time, adds his own time frame of millions of years, and constructs elaborate schemas based upon pure speculation, which have been called evolutionary "Just So stories" after Rudyard Kipling's book of the same name.


Charles Darwin himself was a master of Just So stories, and invoked them whenever he needed to fill in the gaps in his theory. For example, he saw no problem with bears evolving into whales. "I can see no difficulty in a race of bears being rendered, by natural selection, more and more aquatic in their habits, with larger and larger mouths, till a creature was produced as monstrous as a whale" (On the Origin of Species, first edition). He may have had no difficulty with this, but the discerning reader should.


The problem is that there is no evidence for this speculation. Dogs can be bred with longer or shorter snouts, but they are still dogs. Dog breeders have yet to "create" horses, pigs, or anything else other than dogs from dogs. Experiments with genetic manipulation of fruit flies, which have an extremely short life span so can breed very quickly, still only turn out fruit flies, and generally crippled ones at that.


Actually, the breeder example is an argument for, rather than against, Intelligent Design. Breeding is not random mutations, which are generally harmful or fatal; it is purposeful, intelligent manipulation. With all that intelligence, man still can only make dogs from dogs. If we cannot do it, why do we assume that some random, never observed, process can?


Another example was Darwin's famous observations of the finches, the proportion of which possessed large, strong beaks was greater in dry weather when seeds were hard than in wet weather when the seeds were soft. The problem is that when the weather changed, the proportion of large, hard beaks changed as well. This is simply cyclical change, not unlike "global warming". If only the birds with the large beaks survived the dry weather, why were birds with small beaks predominant when the weather again turned wet? And why were there some of both kinds in either condition?


Obviously in any event the theory fails to explain where the finches, or dogs for that matter, came from in the first place.


"Oh, but all this takes place gradually by successive approximation over long periods of time", say the evolutionists. Unfortunately, the intermediary forms have not been found, and generally would not be viable, due to the concept of irreducible complexity. In short, successive approximation, or gradual evolution, would be like changing the engine of the airplane in which you are traveling from propeller to jet in small increments while the plane is flying. Imagine changing only one small thing, like removing the propeller, while the plane is in flight. What would be the result for the passengers?


Biochemist Dr. Michael Behe put it succinctly. "The idea of Darwinian molecular evolution is not based on science. There is no publication in the scientific literature - in journals or in books - that describes how molecular evolution of any real, complex, biochemical system either die occur or even might have occurred. Since there is no authority on which to base claims of knowledge, it can truly be said that the assertion of Darwinian molecular evolution is merely bluster."


Without going into the many other arguments against macroevolution, a balanced viewpoint would certainly be that the subject is certainly not closed. But that is not what is taught in the schools, or what has permeated what we call "science", as seen in the magazine article. Evolution is taken for granted, and for the materialists who are in charge, it is a matter of faith.


Evolution is vital to the world view of the materialists because it eliminates God. If the Darwinists can rationalize creation as somehow a spontaneous, uncaused cause, they can also jettison the moral teachings that come with the concept of God as Creator. After all, if God created the world and man, He must have had some idea of how man should comport himself as well. That idea might be Natural Law, and its revelation might be the Ten Commandments and Jesus' teaching.


If Darwinists admit God, they must admit that their secular humanism is not valid, and much of it is sin. That is why their "science", the basis of which is supposed to be observation and the search for truth, relies instead on Just So stories and lives in a dream world of political correctness. It is indeed tragic for our society that this is what is being taught in our schools.


Back in the 1960's Paul Simon wrote a song called Kodachrome, which began as follows:


When I think back on all the crap I learned in high school,
It's a wonder I can think at all.
And though my lack of education hasn't hurt me none
I can read the writing on the wall
."


It is painfully obvious that Simon was right, and that our society is so blinded by political correctness, by the compulsory but erroneous and disproven dogma that passes for "knowledge", that we have become incapable of thinking or evaluating arguments. We have replaced rational discussion with jingoism and ad hominum attacks, where cries of "Racist!" or "Homophobe"" substitute for discussion. Subjects are closed; the decisions have been made by the self-anointed, and there is to be no questioning those decisions, no "hate speech" allowed.


Political correctness, as taught in our schools and increasingly mandated by our government, is destroying our nation. Our First Amendment rights to free speech and freedom of religion are under attack as never before, and the forces of evil are winning. We must remember George Washington's prophetic warning: If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter. Let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle."

----------

Dr. Frederick Liewehr is an endodontist who teaches and works in private practice. He converted from Protestantism to Catholicism in 1983, having been drawn ineluctably to Christ's Church by the light of Truth. He is a member of St. Benedict parish in Richmond, a Fourth Degree Knight of Columbus and a Cooperator of Opus Dei.

---


Pope Francis: end world hunger through 'Prayer and Action'


Copywriter 2015 - Distributed by THE NEWS CONSORTIUM

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for May 2015
Universal:
That, rejecting the culture of indifference, we may care for our neighbours who suffer, especially the sick and the poor.
Evangelization: That Mary's intercession may help Christians in secularized cultures be ready to proclaim Jesus.


Rosaries, Crosses, Prayer Cards and more... by Catholic Shopping .com


Comments


More Politics & Policy

Thirteen cases that will dramatically change the American way of life stand before Supreme Court Watch

Image of Heading into the final month of its annual term, the Supreme Court will need to render decisions on 13 very important cases that will dramatically affect the American way of life.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Heading into the final month of its annual term, the Supreme Court will need to render decisions on 13 very important cases that will dramatically affect the American way of life. The high court will decide whether same-sex couples have a right to marry ... continue reading


Mysterious company without assets plays role in Clinton's fortunes Watch

Image of In the meantime, the identities of several U.S. and foreign-based companies that Bill Clinton worked for have been disclosed in Hillary Clinton's recent financial report.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

A mysterious company called WJC, LLC without assets or employees has been discovered in the financial files of Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton. The former president has legally used the company to provide consulting and other services. This fact demonstrates ... continue reading


Obama's use of social media points to cozy relationship between White House, Silicon Valley Watch

Image of Recognized as the first American president of the social media age, Obama has already established a standard for how politicians connect with a digitally savvy electorate.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

President Barack Obama was swept to victory in an age of tweets, Facebook, texting and social media. While this has gotten the vote out to younger members of the electorate, there are concerns that the instant gratification of the electronic age is trivializing ... continue reading


President Obama's domestic policies under heavy legal scrutiny Watch

Image of Many of President Obama's social policies may not stand up to scrutiny in a court of law.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

United States President, Barack Obama will be leaving office in January of 2017. When we consider his legacy he leaves to the nation, we must take into account that many of his domestic policies - such as those on same-sex marriage, Obamacare and immigration ... continue reading


Obama radically reformed an important American system -- and you didn't even realize it! Watch

Image of

By Abigail James (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

While President Obama's constantly "reforms" areas of our legislation and laws, the traditional patent law has taken a hit. Although most Americans know very little and don't care very much about patent laws, the effect these changes will have on innovative America can ... continue reading


Democrats break ranks with Obama over secret trade bill Watch

Image of Senator Elizabeth, the Senior Democratic Senator from Massachusetts, is leading a bill which would force President Obama to be transparent in regards to his secret trade bill which only Congressional members may review.

By Matt Waterson (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

President Obama's secretive trade bill is coming under fire from some unlikely sources, namely Democratic Senators Joe Manchin (WV) and Elizabeth Warren (MA), who are both leading the charge for immediate consideration of a bill that would require the contents of ... continue reading


ISIS, IRAN, OBAMACARE: President Obama's legacy - very slim indeed! Watch

Image of A very nonplussed looking president, indeed.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

United States President Barack Obama will be out of office shortly. How will historians judge him? Not too well, according to New York Post columnist John Podhoretz. "After the failure of the Arab Spring, the collapse of Libya, the failure to act on his ... continue reading


CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE? Hillary Clinton had 'Leadership, Ownership, Stewardship' of Libyan policy 'from start to finish' Watch

Image of State Department Director of Policy and Planning Jake Sullivan and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Barack Obama at the U.S.-ASEAN meeting in Cambodia on Nov. 20, 2012.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

According to one of her top aides, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had "leadership/ownership/stewardship of this country's Libya policy from start to finish." That claim came in an email written by one of Clinton's top aides. The message was forwarded ... continue reading


All for naught? FBI admits that Patriot Act didn't lead to cracking major terrorist cases Watch

Image of Opponents, with the inspector general conclude that no major cases have been broken by use of the Patriot Act's records-snooping provisions.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

It granted the Federal Bureau of Investigation bold new powers - but now the FBI admits that the Patriot Act didn't help them crack any major terrorism cases. The Justice Department's Inspector general Michael E. Horowitz now says there are issues that keep key ... continue reading


Karl Rove's American Crossroads no longer as powerful as it once was Watch

Image of American Crossroads began by Karl Rove and other powerful Republicans were at one time a most powerful force in American politics.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

American Crossroads, created by Karl Rove and other powerful Republicans, was at one time a most powerful force in American politics. There is evidence, however, that this is changing. The American political landscape is changing, and the group is seeing the ... continue reading


All Politics & Policy News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Daily Readings

Reading 1, Sirach 36:5-6, 10-17
5 Send new portents, do fresh wonders, win glory for ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 79:8, 9, 11, 13
8 Do not count against us the guilt of former ... Read More

Gospel, Mark 10:32-45
32 They were on the road, going up to Jerusalem; ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for May 27th, 2015 Image

St. Augustine of Canterbury
May 27: At the end of the sixth century anyone would have said that ... Read More

Inform, Inspire & Ignite Logo

Find Catholic Online on Facebook and get updates right in your live feed.

Become a fan of Catholic Online on Facebook


Follow Catholic Online on Twitter and get News and Product updates.

Follow us on Twitter