Peace Cross case headed to Supreme Court
FREE Catholic Classes
The Supreme Court will once again consider the legality of religious monuments on public land during the current session.
Washington D.C., (CNA) - The Court announced November 2 that it had granted certiorari to Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. American Humanist Association.
The case concerns the so-called â€˝Peace Cross" in Prince George's County, Maryland, erected in honor of soldiers who lost their lives in World War I. In 2014, the American Humanist Association, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit that promotes â€˝secular humanist" beliefs, filed suit against the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission because of the shape of the monument.
The monument was erected in 1925, and was paid for by mothers of soldiers killed in the war. It lists the names of 49 members of the local community who died in service, as well as the seal of the American Legion and the words â€˝valor," â€˝endurance," â€˝courage," and â€˝devotion" on the four branches.
The American Legion regularly hosts secular, patriotic events around the monument, and there has not been any sort of religious ceremony involving the cross in 87 years.
The American Humanist Association, along with a few local residents who joined the suit, argue that the cross-monument is an endorsement of Christianity on public land, and thus a violation of the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.
The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from establishing a state religion or giving preference to one religious belief over another.
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission has performed regular maintenance around the monument since 1961, as it is located on a median in the middle of a public road. This, the American Humanist Association has argued, is entangling government unnecessarily with religion.
The American Humanist Association had also sued the American Legion regarding the cross, but the cases were consolidated into one when they were granted certiorari.
The lawsuit was originally brought in 2014 and rejected by the District Court, which held that it was â€˝uncontroverted" that the maintenance and display of the memorial was not â€˝driven by a religious purpose whatsoever."
In 2017, after the District Court initially rejected the case, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the monument was, in fact, unconstitutional. This ruling was then appealed to the Supreme Court.
The upcoming decision would impact not only the â€˝Peace Cross," but also other religious-themed monuments on public land, including Arlington National Cemetery. Currently, the law is unclear as to what exactly constitutes a violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment when it concerns religious-themed monuments.
The last time the Supreme Court was presented with controversy over a religious monument on public grounds was in 2005, when they ruled that a 10 Commandments monument at the Texas State Capitol did not violate the Establishment Clause. Chief Justice William Rehnquist wrote the plurality opinion.
In his concurring opinion, Justice Stephen Breyer argued that while the 10 Commandments certainly has a religious connection, the context and location of that specific monument played a role in its constitutionality. These factors, as well as the fact that in its 40-year history no one had complained about it until the plaintiff brought suit, it was part of the â€˝broader moral and historical message reflective of a cultural heritage" on display at the Capitol.
Copyright 2019 - Distributed by THE CALIFORNIA NETWORK
Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for January 2019
Young People and the Example of Mary. That young people, especially in Latin America, follow the example of Mary and respond to the call of the Lord to communicate the joy of the Gospel to the world.
The state of Montana is considering a bill that would criminalize revenge porn - the circulation of nude photos of another person without ... continue reading
Pro-life members of Congress this week sent U.S. President Donald Trump two companion letters requesting that he veto any legislation that ... continue reading
The marchers come by the hundreds of thousands to Washington, DC this Friday. Fr. Frank Pavone, National Director, Priests for Life - ... continue reading
Religious freeom is innate and must be protected, US president Donald Trump said in his proclamation for Religious Freedom Day, which is ... continue reading
Cardinal Donald Wuerl will not celebrate the Jan. 18 Mass for Life, to be held at a youth rally before the annual March for Life. Wuerl was ... continue reading
by Catholic Online
- Daily Reading for Monday, January 21st, 2019 HD Video
- Bill to ban revenge porn introduced in Montana
- Guam archdiocese files for bankruptcy following sex abuse lawsuits
- Daily Reading for Tuesday, January 22nd, 2019 HD Video
- St. Fabian: Saint of the Day for Sunday, January 20, 2019
- Daily Readings for Sunday, January 20, 2019
- Holy cow: Farm animals receive blessing outside St Peter's Square
- Prayer Requests Live for Friday, January 18th, 2019 HD
- Daily Reading for Sunday, January 20th, 2019 HD
- Prayer Requests Live for Thursday, January 17th, 2019 HD
- Daily Reading for Saturday, January 19th, 2019HD
Learn about Catholic world
Inform - Inspire - Ignite
Catholic Online Saints
Your saints explained
Catholic Online Prayers
Prayers for every need
Catholic Online Bible
Complete bible online
Catholic Online News
Your news Catholic eye
Today's bible reading
Products and services we offer
Catholic Online Shopping
Catholic medals, gifts & books
The California Network
Inspiring streaming service
Learn the Catholic way
Teacher lesson plans & resources
Support Free Education
Tax deductible support Free education