Skip to content
Deacon Keith Fournier Hi reader, it seems you use Catholic Online a lot; that's great! It's a little awkward to ask, but we need your help. If you have already donated, we sincerely thank you. We're not salespeople, but we depend on donations averaging $14.76 and fewer than 1% of readers give. If you donate just $5.00, the price of your coffee, Catholic Online School could keep thriving. Thank you. Help Now >

Twitter to ban 'way of talking' - could this include Christian speech?

Free World Class Education
FREE Catholic Classes

By Marshall Connolly (Catholic Online)
1/12/2018 (1 year ago)
Catholic Online (

Social media censorship on the rise.

Social media censorship is on the rise, prompting fears that Christian speech could be stifled. Recently, a Twitter engineer was caught on camera explaining an algorithm the company could use to stifle speech they don't like. Facebook has also announced a major change to its news feed which will suppress news. 

Social media sites are increasing censorship, but will it affect Christian speech too?

Social media sites are increasing censorship, but will it affect Christian speech too?


By Marshall Connolly (Catholic Online)
Catholic Online (
1/12/2018 (1 year ago)

Published in Technology

Keywords: censorship, social media, Twitter, Facebook, Christian, speech

LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - The marketplace of ideas has moved online to social media, but the protections of the First Amendment have not followed. This lag between technology and the law has allowed social media giants like Twitter and Facebook to manipulate their algorithms to favor speech they like and suppress speech they don't like. 

The First Amendment is intended to protect speech people don't like. Unpopular and offensive speech is protected. The only speech that is not protected is hate speech, fighting words, and libel and slander. These definitions, while seemingly broad, have remarkably narrow legal interpretations, which allows most people to post anything from angry screeds to fake news without much consequence. 

We may not like the anger or the fake news, but we generally accept that people have a right to these forms of expression. The onus is on the individual to filter out, block, or counter the content they don't like. However, in recent years social media engineers have taken it upon themselves to decide what you will like and dislike. 

James O'Keefe, the young conservative investigative reporter whose methods have been questioned, has nonetheless produced a video in which a Twitter engineer talks about a practice called shadow banning. 

Shadow banning is a form of censorship that prevents a person's content from being seen by others. A person can still post content, but others will never see it. The person then assumes their content wasn't compelling, so they eventually change what they post. 

This is a stealthy way to get people to stop posting about things Twitter doesn't like. Or, as the engineer put it, "banning a way of speech."

A good example would be the use of strong language in a tweet. That tweet would be posted, but it would be flagged by the algorithm and nobody would see it. Eventually, the person would realize that strong language prevents engagement and they will change their habits. 

That sounds great until you realize that engineers could decide that Christian speech should be shadow banned. Or any other form of speech. Twitter already bans speech from Islamic militants. Most people agree this is a smart decision and one that promotes public safety. But what happens when that ban creeps into strong language? And from there goes to political speech or to religious expression? Where does the line get drawn? 

Facebook recently announced they will lose money on a major change to their newsfeed algorithm. They will now share more content from friends and less news. This is a popular, but expensive change from Facebook. The social media king says it is to diminish the impact of fake news. But what is fake news? Who decides? Present-day media is notoriously biased and unreliable. 

YouTube has infamously blocked several of Catholic Online's videos including prayers and bible readings. No explanation is ever offered. The company's algorithm occasionally takes offense at some content and bans it. There are no copyright violations, no strong language or explicit content. Yet some Bible readings and prayers simply get rejected. Having the content reinstated is difficult, since it can be hard to get a person to review the case. 

After a hack in 2015, Catholic Online suffered a nine-month ban on Facebook despite recovering from the hack within hours. It took tremendous lobbying and legal wrangling just to restore the account. 

Social media giants like Facebook don't have much regard for individual entities. They are engineering reality for many people by suppressing stories, thoughts and ideas they don't like while promoting things they do like. That would be fine if everyone thought alike, but we do not. 

The First Amendment exists for a reason. It exists to protect speech that is unpopular, even offensive. But when anti-Christian speech is given a pass on social media and Bible readings are banned, there exists a serious problem. We have no idea what the engineers at these firms are doing with our news and information. But at which point they take it upon themselves to decide what we want to see, they are censoring. And censorship is never part of a healthy society. 


More Technology

NASA scientist has a good case to say life discovered on Mars. If true, what does the Church say? Watch

Image of The Viking lander performed an experiment to search for signs of life on Mars. The affirmative results were dismissed, but new evidence suggests they should not have been.

A former NASA scientist just made a compelling case that evidence for life was discovered on Mars in 1976. Gilbert V. Levin published an ... continue reading

UK unrolls effective new methods to protect children on the internet

Image of New online restrictions attempt to protect children under the age of 18 from accessing pornography.

Next month, the United Kingdom will roll out new online restrictions in an attempt to protect children under the age of 18 from accessing ... continue reading

Will Facebook finally charge users? Company value plunges on weak results, poor outlook Watch

Image of Zuckerberg lost $18 billion in just five minutes of trading.

Facebook stock plunged yesterday on a poor report to Wall Street. The company's stock fell almost 20 percent, wiping out almost $150 ... continue reading

Someone in China just used blockchain to evade censorship and the implications are staggering Watch

Image of The Great Firewall of China has been breached.

Someone in China has just used blockchain technology to evade censorship, and the implications are staggering. Just as the printing press ... continue reading

Longest Blood Moon eclipse of 21st century looms, along with bad news -- is it an omen? Watch

Image of During a lunar eclipse, the moon can turn orange to blood red or black.

The longest eclipse of the 21st century will occur on the night of July 28, 2018. The eclipse will last for a minute shy of 4 hours, and ... continue reading

Never Miss any Updates!

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers.

Catholic Online Logo

Copyright 2019 Catholic Online. All materials contained on this site, whether written, audible or visual are the exclusive property of Catholic Online and are protected under U.S. and International copyright laws, © Copyright 2019 Catholic Online. Any unauthorized use, without prior written consent of Catholic Online is strictly forbidden and prohibited.

Catholic Online is a Project of Your Catholic Voice Foundation, a Not-for-Profit Corporation. Your Catholic Voice Foundation has been granted a recognition of tax exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Federal Tax Identification Number: 81-0596847. Your gift is tax-deductible as allowed by law.