Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Andrew M. Greenwell, Esq.

6/28/2013 (2 years ago)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

In short, the majority on the United States Supreme Court see us as outlaws. To defend traditional marriage is tantamount to

In one fell swoop, the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Windsor killed the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), thereby assuring that same-sex "marriages" recognized under State laws must be treated as marriages under Federal law.  The immediate result of the majority holding is to open up to the partners of same-sex "marriage" thousands of benefits, including estate tax exemptions, social security benefits, the ability to file joint tax returns, and so forth. But that result is not the worst of it.  What is worse is what the opinion forebodes. 

Highlights

By Andrew M. Greenwell, Esq.

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

6/28/2013 (2 years ago)

Published in Politics & Policy

Keywords: same-sex marriage, Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA,


CORPUS CHRISTI, TX (Catholic Online) - In one fell swoop, five justices composing a majority of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Windsor killed the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), thereby assuring that same-sex "marriages" recognized under State laws must be treated as marriages under Federal law. 

The immediate result of the majority holding is to open up to the partners of same-sex "marriage" thousands of benefits, including estate tax exemptions, social security benefits, the ability to file joint tax returns, and so forth.  The ripple effect will be significant.

But that result is not the worst of it. 

What is worse is what the opinion forebodes. 

The majority opinion--authored by "sweet mystery of life" Justice Kennedy and joined by the irreformable liberal justices Gingsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan--states in not-so-veiled language that defending traditional marriage serves to "degrade or demean" same-sex "marriage," that it causes "injury and indignity" to, that it clearly evinces a "bare . . . desire to harm," and that it can only intend to "disparage and injure" same-sex couples.

As recognized by the dissenting justices, in particular Justice Scalia, the fundamental premise of the majority opinion--clearly visible through its "argle bargle" and "rootless and shifting" justifications that sound (but really only sound) in federalism, equal protection, and due process--is that any sort of held view that marriage and its benefits should be limited to a union between one man and one woman is "irrational," and therefore can only be motivated by "malice," or "bigotry." 

It is only legislators "with hateful hearts" that could have "voted 'aye'" on DOMA. 

It is only "mean-spirited" justices that would support such laws.

What this sort of rabid secular liberal dogma held by the majority forebodes is that any action, legislative, political, social, or religious, seeking to sustain traditional marriage--since by definition it infringes upon same-sex "marriage"--is ipso facto a legal, political, or social evil. 

Worse, in the view of the self-righteous majority, such a view is necessarily motivated by spite, by hatred, by bigots and moral ignoramuses.  The intent is necessarily evil.

In the view of the majority of the Supreme Court, to borrow from the dissent of Justice Scalia, "any resistance to" the majority's holding is "beyond the pale of reasoned disagreement."  It follows that only a fool or, what's worse, a bigot would hold against the enlightened majority.

In effect, by "adjudging those who oppose" same-sex "marriage" equivalent to "hostes humani generis, enemies of the human race," the majority has declared war against advocates of traditional marriage. 

In short, the majority on the United States Supreme Court see us as outlaws.  To defend traditional marriage is tantamount to "hate your neighbor."  We are persona non grata, moral undesirables.

We are dealing here with two clashing visions, and only one side has the power: the majority of liberal justices on the Court.  The majority of the Court clearly has no compunction in voiding any legislative or executive effort at buttressing traditional understanding of marriage. 

The five ennobled ones are the only majority that counts.  What the majority in Congress or any State legislature or the people may think is irrelevant, unless such majority sides with the enlightened majority on the Supreme Court, in which case it's all well-and-fine.

The precious five that constitute the majority feel no compunction on overruling a law passed by Congress and signed into law by the President.  Is there any doubt how eagerly it will dispose of a law passed by a State legislature and signed by a measly State governor?

And how naturally shall the majority's view lead to sanctions against the Church?  Or to political groups who seek to advance traditional marriage?  How, for example, can tax exempt status be justified?  How can contributions to such groups be considered tax deductible?  In the view of the five justices that make up the majority, these groups are morally diseased: they advocate, and are indeed built upon, invidious discrimination.

The Catholic Church, basing herself on the natural moral law and reason, insists that giving legal recognition to same-sex unions is against the common good. 

But the majority on the Supreme Court--the five Spartan ephors with not-so-Spartan surnames of Kennedy, Gingsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan--hold exactly the opposite. 

In the words of Justice Scalia, the federal shoe against same-sex "marriage," has dropped. 

One can easily look beyond the "argle bargle" of the majority opinion and see that it is only a matter of time before the "second, state-law shoe" drops.  And it won't stop there.

If DOMA violates the equal protection and due process clause of the Fifth Amendment, it follows invariably that any state law that seeks to define marriage as a union between one man and one woman only violates the equal protection and due process rights of the Fourteenth Amendment.
 
The arguments in Windsor, Scalia observes, are conveniently, even "deliberately," "transposable" to a future challenged to a State law defining marriage as between one man and one woman.  He's already written a draft of a future opinion in his dissent.

After the State laws go, the proponents of same-sex "marriage" will turn their full attention to the Church.  The Church and a few others that align themselves with her will be the only ones insisting that, based upon reason and revelation both, marriage is, and can only be, a life-long commitment between a man and a woman and that any sort of normalization of same-sex unions is a moral, legal, political, and social evil. 

Don't expect much of a hearing: in the eyes of these secular liberal idealogues, the Church has as much moral standing as the Ku Klux Klan.

-----

Andrew M. Greenwell is an attorney licensed to practice law in Texas, practicing in Corpus Christi, Texas.  He is married with three children.  He maintains a blog entirely devoted to the natural law called Lex Christianorum.  You can contact Andrew at agreenwell@harris-greenwell.com.

---


Pope Francis: end world hunger through 'Prayer and Action'


Copywriter 2015 - Distributed by THE NEWS CONSORTIUM

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for July 2015
Universal:
That political responsibility may be lived at all levels as a high form of charity.
Evangelization: That, amid social inequalities, Latin American Christians may bear witness to love for the poor and contribute to a more fraternal society.



Comments


More Politics & Policy

'The whole Bible is incredible': Donald trump ridiculed for not naming favorite Bible verse Watch

Image of Donald Trump claims the Bible is his favorite book.

By Kenya Sinclair (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

During an interview with Bloomberg's Mark Halerin and John Heilemann, presidential candidate, Donald Trump was asked to name his favorite Bible verse but refused to name one. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Seven minutes into the interview, Halerin told Trump, "You ... continue reading


EVERY 93 SECONDS: Foreign children born on U.S. soil Watch

Image of Children of immigrants born on United States soil appear to be wearing out their welcome, according to recent polls.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Children of immigrants born on United States soil appear to be wearing out their welcome, according to recent polls. It is estimated that a child of illegal immigrants is born every 93 seconds in the U.S. According to a 2011 Rasmussen Poll, only 28 percent of likely ... continue reading


Univision anchor Jorge Ramos EJECTED from Donald Trump press conference Watch

Image of

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

"Go back to Univision," GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump told Univision news anchor Jorge Ramos at an Iowa press conference. Well regarded by his peers, there was no gravitas afforded Ramos at the event, as a security guard escorted him away. The occasion ... continue reading


The do-nothing Boehner is not only stupid, he's pro-Planned Parenthood - revealed by his incestuous political relationship with an abortion-affiliated adviser Watch

Image of Boehner makes a lot of money off Obamacare and other investments in the medical industry, thanks to his privileged position in Congress.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Charlotte Ivancic, Health Policy Advisor to Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), is leaving his office to work for a lobbying firm. Ivancic is the older sister of Cate Dyer, the CEO of StemExpress. Dyer was caught discussing the sale of aborted children on video by the ... continue reading


When it comes to illegal immigration, EVERYBODY WINS! Except you, of course you lose Watch

Image of Attitude is everything.

By David Drudge, Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Americans tend to agree we need some kind of immigration reform, but they can't agree on how bad the problem is, or even what that reform should look like. Here is a story that will shock you into thinking harder about the problem. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - ... continue reading


It has happened before: President Bill Clinton PARDONED former CIA Director for home computer Classified Document mess Watch

Image of In truth, Hillary Clinton's current controversy over keeping sensitive, classified information on home computers had its basis in which her husband, former president Bill Clinton pardoned former CIA director John Deutch . who likewise kept classified material on unsecured, private computers.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

In truth, Hillary Clinton's current controversy over keeping sensitive, classified information on home computers had its basis in which her husband, former president Bill Clinton pardoned former CIA director John Deutch who likewise kept classified material on ... continue reading


Federal judge states Hillary Clinton's private emails violated policy Watch

Image of

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

"We wouldn't be here today if this employee had followed government policy," U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan, in reference to Hillary Clinton's recent email fracas, said. Controversy continues to swell over Clinton's email. Some argue that she violated government ... continue reading


POLL: Majority of Republican voters think Donald Trump is a likely presidential candidate Watch

Image of According to a recent Rasmussen Reports poll, 57 percent of all registered Republican voters say Donald Trump will likely be on the presidential ticket next year.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said many outrageous things that have deftly expressed the American public's dissatisfaction with domestic policy. There are still many people who think it is all grandstanding on Trump's part, but according to a ... continue reading


'I'd say 'ISIS wants to get you'': Presidential candidate Donald Trump says he will warn Pope Francis that ISIS is out to get him Watch

Image of Donald Trump says

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in his typical style made quite a few jaws drop in an interview on CNN this week. Reporter Chris Cuomo asked the billionaire what he would say to Pope Francis come his visit to the U.S. in September. In a roundabout way, ... continue reading


NEW EMAIL SCANDAL: Thousands of emails State Department said didn't exist 'magically' appear Watch

Image of The State Department has turned up a massive cache of Reines' emails. Philippe Reines rose to the rank of Deputy Assistant Secretary of State while Clinton was at the helm.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has yet another email scandal in the wings. Gossip Web site Gawker requested emails from Clinton's previous media handler Philippe Reines under the Freedom of Information Act in 2013. The State Department said that they ... continue reading


All Politics & Policy News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Daily Readings

Reading 1, First Thessalonians 4:13-18
13 We want you to be quite certain, brothers, about ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 96:1, 3, 4-5, 11-12, 13
1 Sing a new song to Yahweh! Sing to Yahweh, all the ... Read More

Gospel, Luke 4:16-30
16 He came to Nazara, where he had been brought up, ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for August 31st, 2015 Image

St. Raymond Nonnatus
August 31: Raymond was born at Portella, Catalonia, Spain. He was delivered ... Read More

Inform, Inspire & Ignite Logo

Find Catholic Online on Facebook and get updates right in your live feed.

Become a fan of Catholic Online on Facebook


Follow Catholic Online on Twitter and get News and Product updates.

Follow us on Twitter