Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Douglas W. Kmiec

3/4/2008 (8 years ago)

Legal Times (www.legaltimes.com)

That "we can live with one another in a way that reconciles the beliefs of each with the good of all."

Highlights

By Douglas W. Kmiec

Legal Times (www.legaltimes.com)

3/4/2008 (8 years ago)

Published in Politics & Policy


LOS ANGELES (Catholic Online) - In the Feb. 26 Democratic debate, Tim Russert asked Sen. Barack Obama what he thought of minister Louis Farrakhan's endorsement of him.

Obama said he denounced it, which was good enough for everybody but Sen. Hillary Clinton, who demanded that Obama also reject it. Obama, with bemused annoyance, complied, but I thought, uh-oh, here we go, will Republicans dissatisfied with their default nominee be the next potential votes denounced and rejected?

Russert didn't ask, and Obama said he welcomed support from a wide range of people including Republicans and independents. What a relief!

In an essay for Slate magazine ("Reaganites for Obama?" Feb. 13), I suggested that two groups I know well -- Reaganites and Catholics -- might be happier with Barack Obama than Sen. John McCain.

The essay stirred up a ruckus among my former Reagan administration colleagues (who thought I was abusing some substance, like a few other Malibuites who succumbed to their "last temptations" in recent years) and in church communities across the country (which just said they would pray for me).

My reasons for writing so provocatively were a combination of skepticism toward McCain (full disclosure: I was a legal adviser to Mitt Romney, so skepticism came naturally) and a fascination with Obama. Unless you gave up TV for the duration of the writers' strike or something shorter, such as Lent, the Ronald Reagan comparison is obvious. Obama's eloquence and inspiration is inescapable.

The Catholic doubts about McCain are more subtle, but my point -- which actually has implications for many faiths -- is that signing on to the McCain campaign by default slights a large body of religious teaching in opposition to Iraq and strongly in favor of immigrants, the environment, and the family wage.

So with the innocence of someone who teaches Sunday school in a laid-back beach community, I suggested that believers had a moral obligation to inquire further.

SOMETHING DEEPER

The suggestion gathered some support, but also abundant amounts of personal vilification insinuating that I had sold my soul for a prospective Supreme Court appointment in an Obama administration (which has the entire People for the American Way in stitches) or damning me for eternity.

Ordinarily this would not prompt me to write more, but now that the epithets have temporarily subsided (Muqtada al-Sadr's cease-fire or perhaps the surge is working), herewith a few additional thoughts in mitigation (or aggravation as the case may be).

Well before Obama entered the national consciousness by means of presidential primary, he addressed what he called "the mutual suspicion that sometimes exists between religious America and secular America."

In a speech entitled "Call to Renewal," given in Washington in the summer of 2006 (at a poverty conference of the same name), Obama noted that during his Senate campaign, he was challenged on his abortion views. Obama gave the standard liberal response: It is impermissible to impose his religious views upon another. He was running for "U.S. senator of Illinois and not the minister of Illinois," he quipped.

Had Obama left it at that, he could easily be written off by conservatives as just another secular, anti-religious, and, likely, big-government liberal.

But the insufficiency of that answer nagged at him. He realized -- and this epiphany explains his successful campaign, I believe -- that the greatest division in America today is "not between men and women, or those who reside in so-called red states and those who reside in blue, but between those who attend church regularly and those who don't." He also recognized that some conservative leaders "exploit this gap" by reminding evangelical Christians how much Democrats disrespect their values and dislike their church.

Truth hurts, but, of course, pointing fingers at Pat Robertson or Karl Rove would still not have merited positive conservative or Catholic notice -- if Obama hadn't kept talking. He didn't just criticize those on the right who used religion as a wedge issue; he directed a healthy amount of criticism at his own party.

Democrats, he said, avoid engaging the substance of religious values by falsely claiming the Constitution bars the subject. Even worse, some far-left liberals paint religious Americans as "fanatical," rather than as people of faith. Now that got my attention.

Here was a Democrat who got it. Indeed, why say "Democrat"? Here was a public figure who actually understood that, for millions of Americans, faith "speaks to a hunger that's deeper than... any particular issue or cause" -- his words, lest Hillary and the copyright police get on my case.

Obama reflected on how neither of his parents were actively religious, and yet he found himself drawn to the church. He could engage in community organizing for the poor, but without faith he would always remain "apart and alone." Faith did not mean no doubt, said Obama, but it did mean hearing God's spirit beckoning.

After joining an African-American church, he found himself employing the language of faith--well, OK, maybe he did hear it first from Deval Patrick--and ever since his work has been electrified. Xeroxed or not, those references to Abra­ham Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address and "the judgments of the Lord" or Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s embrace of "all of God's children" inspire and call upon our better selves.

SINGING TO THE CHOIR

Obama is frequently chastised these days by Mrs. C for being all words and no substance (or something about hats and cattle that is funny only in Texas), but that criticism is falling flat. Much earlier, Obama himself noted that there is nothing more transparent than "inauthentic expressions of faith."

Showing that occasional dry wit, he likened it to politicians who "come and clap -- off rhythm -- to the choir." So while the number of recent primaries won by Clinton can be counted on one hand clapping, Obama receives thunderous applause whenever he challenges secularism and those who would urge that religion be banished from the public square.

Calling as his faith witnesses Lincoln, King, Frederick Douglass, and Dorothy Day, Obama tells his audiences that it is an "absurdity" to insist that morality be kept separate from public policy.

Having urged liberals to see how much of American life is grounded in the Judeo-Christian tradition, Obama does have a request for conservatives -- namely, try to fully understand the liberal perspective on the separation of church and state. Not the infamous "wall of separation" that bizarrely mandates affirmative secularity disguised as neutrality, but the perspective, according to Obama, that separation more readily protects church from state than the opposite.

This sentiment, unlike the exclusionary view invented by the late Justice Hugo Black in the late 1940s, is as old and wise as Alexis de Tocqueville, who cautioned churches against aligning too closely with the state for fear of sacrificing "the future for the present." "By gaining a power to which it has no claim," Tocqueville observed, "[the church] risks its legitimate authority."

There is nothing in that assessment of church-state separation objectionable to conservatives. Indeed, Obama's thoughts could have been seamlessly added to Romney's "Faith in America" speech without changing its meaning.

LIFE AND DIGNITY

Nevertheless, part of Obama's message remains difficult for conservatives, especially Catholics. Committed to the protection of human life in the womb, Catholics are urged (some of my critics say "mandated," but with respect, they are mistaken) to vote only for candidates who oppose abortion.

In truth -- and here let me quote the bishops directly so they can share in the mail -- "a Catholic cannot vote for a candidate who takes a position in favor of an intrinsic evil, such as abortion or racism, if the voter's intent is to support that position." But voters should not use a candidate's opposition to abortion "to justify indifference or inattentiveness to other important moral issues involving human life and dignity" -- such as, say, the invasion of a foreign nation leading to the sacrifice of the lives of our own troops and of thousands of others.

A digression? I don't think so, but here's the question: Does Obama's thoughtful appreciation of faith mean that he would work toward the protection of life in all contexts even if that protection cannot be achieved in a single step?

I'm inclined to think so, though it's at this juncture that large numbers of my Republican friends will say, "Kmiec, get real, just think who Obama will appoint to the Supreme Court?" That suggests at least two things: First, they really weren't at all serious about my prospects for the top bench, and second, isn't it time for both sides to stop treating the Court like a political sinecure?

Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. has done an able job of lowering the Court's profile. Even when the Roberts Court takes on big issues--such as "partial-birth" abortion and racial tie-breakers--it has knack of writing small, preferring the "as applied" to the "facial" challenge.

With that condo in Florida and his active tennis game, there's no reason to think Justice John Paul Stevens won't reach a Biblical age, and hey, if he hangs on long enough, maybe both sides will have decided so many jurisdictional, tax, and sentencing guideline cases that they won't remember the Court's previous, more activist history.

NOT EASY FOR ANYBODY

OK, that was a digression. Returning to religious conservatives, like me, who have faith-related, ethical concerns, Obama argues that there must be, in this life, a distinction between the uncompromising commitments that religion calls us to make and the public policy that we can realistically expect. This is a dose of political pragmatism, and reasonable on virtually any issue not involving a grave moral evil. It's not an easy answer. But frankly, that's a problem not just for Obama, but for all of us.

As he writes, "I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God's will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all."

To his credit, Obama neither offers up a glib, unsatisfying solution nor reverts to the standard liberal line that objective moral values have no place in the public discussion. Our problems are not mere technical dilemmas "in search of the perfect 10-point plan. They are rooted in both societal indifference and individual callousness -- in the imperfections of man."

If liberals and conservatives would stop shouting at each other (and most especially at me), more people might see abortion as a product of societal indifference and individual callousness: the former exemplified by economic conditions ranging from inadequate wages to evictions traceable to the subprime fraud; the latter typified by a self-centeredness that sees children as competitors or enemies to personal fulfillment.

A person who understands the significance of faith as well as Obama does is likely to have a better chance of understanding and addressing both causes. Why? Because when the seemingly insoluble intrudes upon life as it inevitably does, the religious person has the humility to pray. Obama concluded his own religious reflections a few years back with what he described as "a prayer I still say for America today." The prayer? That despite our profound disagreements, "we can live with one another in a way that reconciles the beliefs of each with the good of all."

This is as much a Catholic prayer as a Jewish or Protestant or Mormon or Muslim one, which is why barring the completely unexpected, Barack Obama will be the next president of the United States -- with or without my vote.


Douglas W. Kmiec holds the Caruso chair in constitutional law at Pepperdine University. He previously served as the dean and St. Thomas More professor of law at the Catholic University of America and as head of the Office of Legal Counsel under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush.



Comments


More Politics & Policy

How much did Goldman Sachs' CEO invest in hedge fund?: Hillary Clinton's bond with Goldman Sachs tightens Watch

Image of Clinton refuses to share investment numbers (Mother Jones).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Hillary Clinton continues to dodge questions concerning the family's relationship with Goldman Sachs. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - According to <a ... continue reading


'The threat of terrorism remains high': Senate uses fear to allow FBI free access to all passwords, internet history and email information Watch

Image of Senate bill attempts to allow FBI access to 'electronic communication transaction records' (Stock Photo).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Personal privacy is one of the greatest rights any citizen of the free world enjoys but soon the Federal Bureau of Investigation may have legal access to everything from passwords and personal emails to banking information and search history - all without your ... continue reading


States revolt, 11 sue to block disruptive Obama restroom edict, protect kids Watch

Image of Obama's policy opens restrooms to perverts who want access to victims in restrooms.

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Eleven states are challenging the Obama edict that schools should allow kids to use whatever bathroom they choose, regardless of their gender. Obama issued the edict last week as a means of joining the "transgender" bandwagon that is sweeping the nation. Unfortunately, ... continue reading


LOL! Clinton chief upset about what happens when a public servant breaks the law, begs judge to save her from criticism Watch

Image of Cheryl Mills is unhappy that her deposition might become the source of criticism.

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Hillary Clinton's former chief of staff from the State Department, Cheryl Mills, has asked a court to shield her from conservatives who are seeking the transcripts and recordings of her deposition scheduled for Friday. Mills is worried she will be taken out of context ... continue reading


REVEALED: China has an army of paid trolls, guess who else has one? Watch

Image of Don't feed the trolls.

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

The next time you encounter an internet troll, be warned, he could be getting paid to fan the flames, or to douse your conversation. A new study our of Harvard reveals that China is using an army of 448 million fake troll accounts to influence public opinion. And China ... continue reading


REPORT: Inspector General SLAMS Hillary Clinton for BREAKING LAW, was WARNED by staffer, whom she PUNISHED! Watch

Image of Audit: Hillary Clinton broke the law.

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

The State Department Inspector General has ruled that Hillary Clinton broke department rules for using a private email server and for deleting emails she sent and received during her tenure. The report was released on Capitol Hill today. LOS ANGELES, CA (California ... continue reading


You won't believe who buys the most weapons from the US! Watch

Image of The United States provides the most weapons to which country (NATO)?

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

The United States provides 33 percent of the world's arms such as fighter jet aircraft, tanks and more - so which countries are buying? LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - According to the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, the number one country purchasing ... continue reading


Obama risking national security to meet political obligation? Watch

Image of Is the Obama administration sacrificing national security in favor of meeting quotas (Reuters)?

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

With many Senate Democrats calling for a faster processing, the Obama Administration and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) have drastically increased the number of Syrian refugees admitted into the United States. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - ... continue reading


FBI investigating Gov. McAuliffe, Clinton Foundation for Chinese ties Watch

Image of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe is under FBI investigation for accepting illegal campaign contributions.

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

The FBI is investigating Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe on the grounds that he accepted illegal campaign contributions. There is overlap between his donors and donors to the Clinton campaign. Investigators have discovered that a Chinese politician made a particularly ... continue reading


American Steel v. China's Production - There is no such thing as free trade Watch

Image of American steel jobs have drastically fallen (iisssc).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

As American steel production falters, China has begun efforts to dump its excess steel at slashed prices. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - According to Thomas J. Gibson, president and CEO of the American Iron and Steel Institute, and Chuck Schmitt, president of SSAB ... continue reading


All Politics & Policy News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Subscribe to Catholic OnlineYouTube Channel

the FEED
by Catholic Online

  • Daily Reading for Wednesday, June 1st, 2016 HD Video
  • Advent Prayer HD Video
  • Daily Readings for Monday, May 30, 2016
  • St. Joan of Arc: Saint of the Day for Monday, May 30, 2016
  • First time in 400 years - 61 cloistered nuns go to prison
  • 'I felt that Jesus called me to this': Pope Francis uses drowned ...
  • How much did Goldman Sachs' CEO invest in hedge fund?: Hillary ...

Daily Readings

Reading 1, First Kings 8:41-43
41 'Even the foreigner, not belonging to your people Israel but coming ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 117:1, 2
1 Alleluia! Praise Yahweh, all nations, extol him, all ... Read More

Gospel, Luke 7:1-10
1 When he had come to the end of all he wanted the people to hear, he ... Read More

Reading 2, Galatians 1:1-2, 6-10
1 From Paul, an apostle appointed not by human beings nor through any ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for May 29th, 2016 Image

St. Maximinus of Trier
May 29: Bishop of Trier, Germany, from 332, and a miracle ... Read More