Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Andrew M. Greenwell, Esq.

5/11/2013 (3 years ago)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

Infertile couples have the right to marriage because they have the capacity to perform the conjugal act that is naturally ordered to procreation, even if it can't lead to procreation for reasons unintended by them. 

Highlights

By Andrew M. Greenwell, Esq.

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

5/11/2013 (3 years ago)

Published in Marriage & Family

Keywords: same-sex marriage, right, duties, office of marriage, Andrew M. Greenwell, Esq.


CORPUS CHRISTI, TX (Catholic Online) - I recently wrote an article on the issue of why there can be no such thing as a "right" to same-sex "marriage."  The article focused on the notion of marriage as a natural "office" (in Latin officium), and argued that, viewed as an "office," marriage gave rise to certain duties (in Latin a "duty" is also called officium), and it is from both the office and its duties that a person can be said to have natural rights to marriage.

The "office of marriage" is a natural office which anticipates the sexual or conjugal union of a man and a woman for reasons of procreation.  Although there are other benefits to the "office of marriage," it is the sexual or conjugal union naturally ordered to the procreation of children which is at the heart of this institution, which distinguishes it from any other natural communion or friendship, and which informs it above all else. 

It is one of its sine qua nons. It is not, however, its only sine qua non.  For example, as part of the office of marriage, the sexual or conjugal act has to be performed within the auspices of a permanent and exclusive commitment.

No same-sex couple has the capacity to assume the "office of marriage" since, as much as they may try, it is impossible that their sexual union can be in any manner procreative.  It is not even ordered remotely to procreation.  It has no procreative meaning at all.  In fact, it has the exact opposite meaning: it is anti-procreative.  It is an act that frustrates the natural purpose of the act, in fact makes a mockery of it. 

Accordingly, same-sex couples have no right to the "office of marriage," because they lack the capacity to perform its underlying duties.  To claim a "right," a false right, is to impugn and caricature the reality of marriage.

In response to the article, I received an email that was complementary of the article, but which posed a question that, I thought, justified a supplemental article.  The question: "If the right to marry can only be claimed by those who can fulfill the duties and obligations of marriage, and if the primary duty of marriage is procreation, then it would seem the argument would follow that the infertile couples could not marry."

Simply put: Can couples who are infertile assume the "office of marriage"? 

(Here, I limit "infertility" to unintentional causes, i.e., to infertility due to physical impediments [e.g., low sperm count, ovarian problems], age, unintended consequences of medicines used to treat some malady, and so forth.  I do not address the issue of infertility caused by the intentional use of artificial contraception for the purpose of preventing procreation.  I will call conjugal acts involving the former situation (those not intentionally impeded) as "unimpeded conjugal acts."  This is to distinguish them from conjugal acts involving intentionally impeded conjugal acts, or sexual acts rendered sterile through artificial contraception, which are of an entirely different moral character, though these will not be addressed in this article.)

To answer the question, we have to focus more intently on the "office of marriage," and make an either/or distinction.  Here is the watershed question: Is the "office of marriage" fulfilled by the unimpeded conjugal act even if the parties know as a result of some physical, age-related, or other unintentional impediment procreation is impossible as a result?  Or, rather, is the "office of marriage" only fulfilled by the unimpeded conjugal act together with knowledge that procreation will, or will probably, or may possibly result?

We can therefore collapse the question to one framed in this manner.  Does the "office of marriage" involve the capacity to undertake a work or action: an unimpeded conjugal union that is naturally ordered to the procreation of children--or does it also involves the capacity of knowledge (whether certain, probable, or possible) of a result (conception) in addition to the action?

The clue to the answer is given, once again, in the meaning of the word "office."  As explained in the earlier article on this issue, "office" comes from Latin opificium, a combination of opus ("work") and facere ("to do" or "to perform").  What is involved in the "office of marriage" is the ability to do the "work," to perform the conjugal act that is naturally ordered toward the procreation of children.  The work or act of the "office of marriage" does not require us to have knowledge, whether certain, probable, or possible of a particular result from the conjugal act.

Therefore, the issue of knowledge as to whether an unimpeded conjugal act will, or will not, lead to conception is not relevant to the issue of the capacity to perform the duty, and hence is unrelated to the right.  This means that a man and woman capable of the conjugal act have the capacity to assume the "office of marriage," even though they may have knowledge of the fact that the act, for whatever unintended reason, is, may probably be, or may possibly be infertile. 

Infertile couples have the right to marriage because they have the capacity to perform the conjugal act that is naturally ordered to procreation, even if it can't lead to procreation for reasons unintended by them.  Again, same-sex couples do not have the capacity to perform a conjugal act naturally ordered to procreation.  Therefore, fertility--certain, probable, or possible--is irrelevant to the question of capacity of the ability to perform a conjugal act ordered to procreation (i.e., whose intrinsic meaning is procreative, though some accidental and unintended quality may in fact render procreation impossible).

There are also some practical reasons why this has to be the case.  If, in addition to the performance of the conjugal act that is naturally ordered to procreation, knowledge that conception will, or may probably, or may possibly result is demanded, then it is virtually impossible for anyone to assume the "office of marriage."  No one "knows" whether a woman's ovum will be penetrated by a sperm cell as a result of any one particular unimpeded conjugal act.  This is beyond normal human capacity.  It is crazy to require it.

Also, to require knowledge of a future result--whether that knowledge is certain, probable, or even possible--is to fall into a sort of utilitarian or consequentialist view of marriage.  It is well-known how impossible the utilitiarian or consequentialist moral "calculus" is.  Similarly, if the "office of marriage" required a "calculus" of conception, we would be importing an impossible standard into the mix.  There is every practical reason to avoid this view.

Imagine: if the office of marriage, like the conjugal act, were only justified by a conjugal act that resulted in procreation, then we would not know whether a particular conjugal act was good or evil until we learned that it resulted in conception.  Such a view is not reasonable.

More, the capacity to undertake an office, which involves moral, psychological, physical, and perhaps legal capability, cannot depend upon contingencies that are outside of the person's control, things that involve conditions or even involuntary processes that occur even hours after the conjugal act.  We do not hold people morally responsible for things outside their control. 

In addition, one ought not forget that there are goods associated with the conjugal act in addition to procreation, which exist regardless of procreation, so that the good of the unimpeded conjugal act--even where it does not lead to conception for reasons of happenstance--remains.  These also justify the "office of marriage."

While these honest goods (such as the expression of a permanent and exclusive love, remedy of concupiscence, etc.) are found in a conjugal act, these honest goods are not found in any sexual union outside of the conjugal act within marriage.  Sex outside marriage, homosexual sex, adultery, contraceptive sex, self-abuse, and other aberrant sexual expressions cannot be said to contain any honest goods.  It is simply wrong--intrinsically evil, in fact--to express love or unity or to ease concupiscence--by a sexual avenue other than the unimpeded conjugal act.

Finally, if procreation itself is viewed as the exclusive sine qua non of marriage and the conjugal act, then marriage and the conjugal act are reduced to instrumental goods.  Marriage and conjugal sex then become merely useful goods, means and not ends.  But marriage between a man and a woman, and any unimpeded conjugal act within such exclusive and permanent marriage, are goods in themselves, are ends in themselves, irrespective of whether they result in conception.  Marriage and the conjugal act within it are basic human goods, and need no further justification.  This is entirely untrue for same-sex marriage and sexual acts other than conjugal acts.

For these reasons, permanently or periodically infertile couples (so long as the couple is one man and one woman) are capable of assuming the honorable "office of marriage," are capable of making exclusive and permanent commitment, are capable of assuming its conjugal duties, and therefore have an authentic right to marriage and the conjugal act that is so essential to it.

-----

Andrew M. Greenwell is an attorney licensed to practice law in Texas, practicing in Corpus Christi, Texas.  He is married with three children.  He maintains a blog entirely devoted to the natural law called Lex Christianorum.  You can contact Andrew at agreenwell@harris-greenwell.com.

---


Pope Francis: end world hunger through 'Prayer and Action'


Copyright 2016 - Distributed by THE CALIFORNIA NETWORK

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for May 2016
Universal:
Respect for Women: That in every country of the world, women may be honored and respected and that their essential contribution to society may be highly esteemed.
Evangelization: Holy Rosary: That families, communities, and groups may pray the Holy Rosary for evangelization and peace.



Comments


More Marriage & Family

Will South Carolina be able to banish abortions forever? Watch

Image of South Carolina bans abortions after 19 weeks (photosesh).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

South Carolina legislature passed a bill on Tuesday that puts an end to abortions after 19 weeks. Dare we hope the bill is the beginning of the end of abortion? LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - With South Carolina on board, there are seventeen U.S. states banning ... continue reading


How far would YOU go to find happiness? Watch

Image of Indian couple has first child in their 70s (YouTube).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

A 70-year-old woman overcame an infertility with the help of several dead babies and one test tube baby. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Daljinder Kaur and her husband Mohinder Singh Gill spent nearly fifty years of marriage unable to conceive.Finally, at roughly ... continue reading


Abortion: Science beats death with ... death? Watch

Image of Which is worse - murdering your unborn child or murdering them before they can get a fighting chance (pregnancyandbaby)?

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Abortion rates have hit a historic low in wealthy countries - but at what cost? LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - To put it bluntly, abortion rates have dropped due to a rise in the use of contraceptives, not because more women have decided that murdering their ... continue reading


First-grader boasts National handwriting award despite having NO HANDS Watch

Image of Anaya Ellick won an award for having the best handwriting despite not having hands (Facebook).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

A 7-year-old girl who was born without hands beat fifty other first-graders in a national handwriting competition, proving anyone can do anything they put their mind to. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Rather than accepting prosthetic hands, little Anaya Ellick ... continue reading


Man seeks bizarre RESTRAINING ORDER against God Watch

Image of

By Abigail James (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

In a strange request, an Israeli man has petitioned for a restraining order against God.     LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Representing himself in court, the unnamed man entered the Haifa Magistrate's Court in Israel and claimed God had been ... continue reading


'The doctors were shocked': Conjoined twins share unusual bond Watch

Image of The girls may be closer than most but they display very different personalities (Caters News Agency).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

A beautiful set of newborn triplets were delivered via C-section at the Tanjungpinang Regional Genearal Hospital in Indonesia. The girls were strong and healthy with ten little toes and ten little fingers each - but there was one little problem: Two of the girls were ... continue reading


The gruesome way scientists are killing unborn babies in school labratories, with the consent of law Watch

Image of A human baby belongs in its mother's womb, not a petri dish or a garbage can.

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Scientists have been conducting horrifying experiments on unborn babies, fertilizing eggs and seeing how long before they die in a test tube, outside of the womb. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - It's sounds like a horrifying lab experiment out of a prequel to ... continue reading


Top 10 Mother's Day gifts to surprise your mom Watch

Image of How will you surprise your mom this Mother's Day?

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Are you tired of giving your mother the same old Mother's Day gifts? How many more pictures does mom really need? Perhaps it's time to stop ordering the same old flowers and move on to something a little more exciting. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Moms are not ... continue reading


Top 10 mothers from the Bible Watch

Image of Top 10 Biblical moms (Pinterest).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Mothers are God's gift to us all. It is mothers who tend to love us with an unbridled passion and who can kiss all our boo-boos away - but what about the mothers of the Bible? LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - The Bible mentions several mothers and each of them teach ... continue reading


Top 12 Bible Verses for Mom Watch

Image of

By Abigail James (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

The dictionary definition of a mother reads, "Mother: noun. A woman in relation to a child or children to whom she has given birth." However, a mom is so much more than the person who has given birth to the child. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Your mom is the one ... continue reading


All Marriage & Family News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Subscribe to Catholic OnlineYouTube Channel

the FEED
by Catholic Online

  • Daily Reading for Thursday, May 26th, 2016 HD Video
  • Daily Readings for Wednesday, May 25, 2016
  • Nun fatally attacked in South Sudan
  • Benedict XVI to make public appearance?
  • Prayer to Holy Michael the Archangel HD Video
  • Goodbye El Nino! Hello La Nina! What does this mean for the Atlantic ...
  • St. Mary Magdalene de Pazzi: Saint of the Day for Wednesday, May 25, 2016

Daily Readings

Reading 1, First Peter 1:18-25
18 For you know that the price of your ransom from the futile way of life ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 147:12-13, 14-15, 19-20
12 Praise Yahweh, Jerusalem, Zion, praise your God.13 For he ... Read More

Gospel, Mark 10:32-45
32 They were on the road, going up to Jerusalem; Jesus was walking on ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for May 25th, 2016 Image

St. Mary Magdalene de Pazzi
May 25: It would be easy to concentrate on the mystical ... Read More