The Cultural Revolution changed what constitutes the good by suppressing the established social constructs. This breakdown of the natural boundaries of civilized society allowed the implementation of a wholesale redesign of the culture. This new thinking supplanted time-honored behaviors and discarded any moral or spiritual perspective—now thought to be excess baggage. It was time to collapse the walls of propriety and dispense with the rules.
The perpetrators quickly and quietly amassed their powers to effect this change confident in success. They correctly surmised the average individual would not stand up for what is right if it meant being exposed to ridicule or taking direct action. Besides, most were simply convinced it was time to change antiquated mores to free appetites from any attending guilt. However, Fulton Sheen warned, “There has been no single influence which…has done more to lower the moral tone of society than the denial of personal guilt.”
Regrettably, the proliferation of lifestyle experimentation sent a message of a less rigid life and promoted a reason to dismantle traditional attitudes towards work, family, morality and civility. This was done at the cost of subordinating the pursuit of excellence and focusing on mediocrity as a standard sufficient to all tasks. Coupled with lowered standards was the willingness to endorse deviance as an acceptable form of behavior.
Turning hearts and minds away from those ingrained habits of faith, reason and common sense undermined the cohesiveness of societal thought. The major change was the disassembling the sanctity of life and personal responsibility. The moral consensus towards sex, substance abuse, hard work and honesty were consigned to the past altering our view of each other and the world in which we live.
To attract the masses necessary to effect such a change, the gospel of group rights was directed to minorities. The Civil Rights Movement impacted civil society by providing a blueprint for every group with a cause who wanted to impose their agenda or supposed victim hood on the public’s collective conscience.
Emotion, hormones or political agendas do not determine proper behavior. Right reason and common sense promote the common good. This process is indispensable to sustain cultural values and moral ties that bind a nation. Yet the most important determinant of appropriate behavior is the moral courage to accept only rational standards as social norms.
When a culture abandons its duty of transferring its collective wisdom and moral heritage to the next generation it finds itself poised on the brink of decay—a decay created by placing group rights over those of the individual. Anglican convert and priest, Ronald Knox, understood, “Disobedience to conscience on the part of a large multitude is apt to produce an erroneous conscience in society at large.”
Sadly, society by its lack of condemnation provides the balm for those who are fugitives from the demands of conscience. The acceptance of license is fatal to liberty. Deviance for the Hell of it, may indeed, be a self-fulfilling prophecy.
The point wasn't that the civil rights movement in itself needs to take responsibility for our moral woes. The fact is that people who pushed immoral lifestyles piggybacked the movement to the extent that people who support the rights of the ostracized (which is right) are called hypocrites if they don't support other agendas even if the people involved don't necessarily support those lifestyles. We all know that Susan B Anthony was a defender of life and I'm sure MLK was as well but if someone who tries to uphold their legacy mentions that defending life is important, then they are looked upon as bigots. That's where the problem lies. What is right doesn't change because of the times. The truth sets free as it did in Jesus' time.
AI | 4/24/2009
I agree that blaming the civil rights movement thing needs to be better explained. You make it sound like racism was okay and those who stood up against it were wrong. Don't make your articles so short if you can't complete your thoughts.
ZEE | 3/30/2009
i do agree that today we have moved away from good things.But then can we bring morals by showing people down(while they might be guilt or otherwise) or build up enthusiasm by sharing goodwill and sacrifice.Plz lets remember St.Paul's warning to Timothy,:dont get into things which will lead to quarells & fights,dont follow that which for some is "knowledge".
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, antisocial behavior such as "spamming" and "trolling," or other inappropriate comments or material will not be posted on Catholic Online. Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of service. While Catholic Online invites robust discussion, we maintain the right to not print material that is patently false in its claims concerning the teaching of the Magisterium of the Catholic Church, overtly anti-Catholic or which, in the opinion of the moderator, are intended to mislead readers as to what the Catholic Church teaches. Comments DO NOT necessarily reflect the opinion or views of Catholic Online.
RSS | Make Catholic Online Your Homepage
