Skip to main content


Removing the Stain of Blaine

12/2/2003 - 6:00 AM PST

Advertisment

By:Keith A Fournier, Esq
(c) Third Millennium, LLC.

Court watchers, advocates of religious freedom, and proponents of parental choice in education are closely watching an important case currently pending before the United States Supreme Court. That case, Locke v. Davey, concerns the State of Washington’s denial of funding to a College student. Because Joshua Davey graduated in the top ten percent of his high school class and came from a low-income family, he was awarded a scholarship. Joshua chose a double major in religious studies and business administration. Because of that choice, his scholarship award was revoked by the State of Washington.

The denial of scholarship monies to Joshua Davey has far reaching consequences for all religious parents who desire to have their values reinforced in the educational experience that takes place outside of the first schoolhouse of the home.

However, this case concerns much, much more. The denial was predicated upon the use of a so-called “Blaine Amendment.” The constitutionality of these discriminatory laws will now be decided by the High Court. They are an antiquated vestige of anti-Catholic bigotry in our nation’s founding and are now being used by opponents of parental choice in education.

In Zelman v. Simmons-Harris in June 2002, the U. S Supreme Court ruled vouchers for parental choice in education are constitutional. If the Blaine Amendments, which are found in the constitutions of 38 states, are declared unconstitutional, it will remove one of the last legal impediments to parental choice in education across the country.

The provisions of the so-called “Blaine Amendments” have been interpreted in a manner that is even more restrictive than the Establishment Clause (“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”) in the Federal Constitution has recently been interpreted. These amendments gained their name because they were championed by a notoriously anti-Catholic Senator from Maine named James Blaine.

When the first wave of Catholic immigrants came to America, they came in an array of ethnic diversity and cultural variety. They also practiced a different form of Christianity than the majority of the American Christian population. As this Catholic minority grew, the Protestant majority responded with isolationism and nativism. Some sought to homogenize this growing minority into their idea of American civil piety. One of the socio-political structures employed was the common (public) school system.

The predominately Protestant culture bore seeds of anti-Catholicism and failed to respect the legitimate desires of Catholic parents to keep their children Catholic. Catholics responded by forming their own schools to ensure that their children could live and practice their Catholic Christian faith. This set Catholic schools in competition with the “common school” system.

The Protestant majority tried to deny state aid in any form to institutions they labeled as “sectarian.” They failed to accomplish this task at the Federal level, but were successful in their attempts in many State Constitutions such as Washington’s. These so-called “Blaine Amendments” effectively blocked any local or state initiatives that might allow such aid to Catholic schools or parents.

America is now experiencing the consequences of the injustice and errors of past discrimination. Many of the old prejudices are now rightly displaced. However, issues such as the right of parents to choose where to send their children to school or what majors to study reach far beyond the climate of hostility toward one religious group that fostered the Blaine Amendments. Ironically, some religious people whose very ancestors may have supported such efforts are now themselves the subject of their discriminatory impact.

The discriminatory shadow cast by these Amendments now affects Catholics, Orthodox Jews, Evangelical Protestants, Muslims, and others that form the religious tapestry that is the American experience. Parents of every race, creed and color seek to extend their educational mission as the first teachers of their children through choice from among a wide array of schooling options.

Most Americans support the accommodation and tolerance of religion, recognizing that religious persons and institutions play a vital role in society and promote the common good. As Professor John Jeffries Jr. has written concerning the Blaine amendments, “the right response is not refinement but repudiation.” The time has come to put Blaine—and a century of discrimination—wholly behind us once and for all. The treatment of Mr. Davey is repugnant to the legacy of authentic freedom protected by the United States Constitution. It is time to remove the stain of Blaine.

_____________________________

Fournier, a constitutional lawyer and policy activist, is a co-founder of the Your Catholic Voice movement serves as the President of Your Catholic Voice Foundation which has filed an Amicus Brief with the United States Supreme Court in Locke v. Davey asking that the Court find Blaine Amendments unconstitutional.

For more information contact:
info@yourcatholicvoice.org
www.yourcatholicvoice.org
www.ycvf.org

Contact

Your Catholic Voice Foundation
http://www.ycvf.org  VA, US
Deacon Keith Fournier - President, 757 546-9580

Email

keithfournier@cox.net

Keywords

Discrimination

Rate This Article

Very Helpful Somewhat Helpful Not Helpful at All

Yes, I am Interested No, I am not Interested

Rate Article

0 Comments

Leave a Comment

Comments submitted must be civil, remain on-topic and not violate any laws including copyright. We reserve the right to delete any comments which are abusive, inappropriate or not constructive to the discussion.

Though we invite robust discussion, we reserve the right to not publish any comment which denigrates the human person, undermines marriage and the family, or advocates for positions which openly oppose the teaching of the Catholic Church.

This is a supervised forum and the Editors of Catholic Online retain the right to direct it.

We also reserve the right to block any commenter for repeated violations. Your email address is required to post, but it will not be published on the site.

We ask that you NOT post your comment more than once. Catholic Online is growing and our ability to review all comments sometimes results in a delay in their publication.

Send me important information from Catholic Online and it's partners. See Sample

Post Comment

Newsletter Sign Up

Daily Readings

Reading 1, Philippians 1:1-11
Paul and Timothy, servants of Christ Jesus, to all God's holy ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 111:1-2, 3-4, 5-6
Alleluia! I give thanks to Yahweh with all my heart, in the ... Read More

Gospel, Luke 14:1-6
Now it happened that on a Sabbath day he had gone to share a ... Read More

Saint of the Day

October 31 Saint of the Day

St. Wolfgang
October 31: Wolfgang (d. 994) + Bishop and reformer. Born in Swabia, ... Read More