Calling the Media's Bluff
Questioning Coverage of Religious Topics
By Father John Flynn
ROME, APRIL 9, 2007 (Zenit) - Media and religion often have an uneasy relationship. It's not that journalists ignore religious topics, it's just that quality coverage is frequently lacking. Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Vatican secretary of state, recently called certain discrepancies to the media's attention.
During an interview with a French magazine, the cardinal criticized how the press covers the Catholic Church, Reuters reported March 31. Often, he stated, the media concentrate on controversial subjects such as sex and abortion, while ignoring charitable work carried out by thousands of Catholic groups around the world.
"The Church's messages are subject to a type of manipulation and falsification by some Western media," said Cardinal Bertone.
The cardinal also said that Benedict XVI's Regensburg address last September was falsely reported, with undue attention given to a quote by the Pope of what a Byzantine emperor said about Muslims. The speech was really a discussion of the role God plays in society.
"Commentators who take phrases out of context in a misleading extrapolation are exercising their trade dishonestly," Cardinal Bertone said.
The cardinal also found fault with all the attention given to the Discover Channel documentary "The Lost Tomb of Jesus." He said that the publicity given to such specious arguments weakens the faith of people.
The documentary, which aired March 4, is a case in point of how media reports can give a false impression of the facts. James Cameron, the film's director, said there was solid statistical evidence that the ossuary found in a Jerusalem suburb in 1980 may have contained the bones of Jesus and other family members, the Associated Press reported Feb. 26.
The extensive attention given by the media to the documentary was soon scrutinized. The Washington Post reported Feb. 28 that Biblical archaeologist William Dever said of the hype surrounding the documentary: "I just think it's a shame the way this story is being hyped and manipulated."
"It's a publicity stunt, and it will make these guys very rich, and it will upset millions of innocent people because they don't know enough to separate fact from fiction."
The allegedly solid statistical evidence behind the documentary came under scrutiny by Carl Bialik, who writes a column on statistics for the Wall Street Journal. In an article dated March 9, Bialik looked at the claim that finding a tomb with the names of Jesus and other family members was so statistically unlikely that it was proof that it was really the tomb of Jesus.
The documentary's statistical claims were based on work by a University of Toronto statistician, Andrey Feuerverger. His work supposedly showed that there is just a one-in-600 chance that the names on the tomb would have come together in a family that didn't belong to Jesus of Nazareth.
But, Bialik pointed out, this calculation is based upon many assumptions. There are differences of opinion on how the inscriptions on the tomb should be interpreted. Choosing interpretations different from those of the documentary severely weakens the statistical proof that it was the tomb of Jesus, he said.
In addition to problems with the interpretation of the names, there is also only partial evidence regarding the frequency of these names in the population at the time. Ivo Dinov, assistant professor of statistics at the University of California, Los Angeles, told Bialik: "I wouldn't be comfortable coming up with a number like this, because the general audience will not understand that it is very, very subjective."
The documentary's alleged revelations form part of a pattern about media coverage leading up to Easter, explained Charlotte Allen, an editor at Beliefnet, in an opinion article the Los Angeles Times published March 4.
"All these 'revelations' are part of a continuing cottage industry of constructing alternative versions of Christianity to the one we already have," commented Allen. Often the newly discovered "gospels" or other documents respond to a need by persons or groups to find an alternative doctrinal form that fits in with their personal ideas of how Christianity should be, she added.
"People who find notions of sin, salvation, atonement and an afterlife incredible or distasteful can banish them from their personal cosmologies by finding an ancient document where they are absent," noted Allen.
As if on cue, a headline in the the London-based Times newspaper reported March 21 that "Jesus was no miracle worker."
The article reported on the content of the book written by Benjamin Iscariot, with Jeffery Archer and Francis Molony, entitled "The Gospel ...
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Featured Today
- Monaco & The Vatican: Monaco's Grace Kelly Exhibit to Rome--A Review of Monegasque-Holy See Diplomatic History
- My Dad
- A Royal Betrayal: Catholic Monaco Liberalizes Abortion
- John Paul II as an Apostle of Mercy
- Embrace every moment as sacred time
- A Recession Antidote
- The Why of Jesus' Death: A Pauline Perspective
- Father Lombardi's Address on Catholic Media
- Pope's Words to Pontifical Latin American College
- Prelate: Genetics Needs a Conscience