Interview With David Quinn of the Iona Institute
DUBLIN, Ireland, MARCH 8, 2007 (Zenit) - A new think tank in Ireland is making the case that marriage and religious practice are vital contributors to a healthy, well-functioning civil society.
The Iona Institute for Religion and Society, directed by religious and social affairs commentator David Quinn, was launched last month to disseminate evidence-based research in favor of the importance of strong families and religious values in Irish society.
Quinn, one of the best-known religious affairs correspondents for the Irish Independent, comments in this interview with us on the situation of the family and religious practice in Ireland.
Q: Why did you decide to found the Iona Institute?
Quinn: The chief reason is that there was no organization in Ireland making known the evidence that both marriage and religious practice have numerous social and personal benefits. Nor was there any organization dedicated to devising policies that might promote and strengthen marriage.
Marriage is under severe pressure from individualistic social norms and what might be called "the family diversity" view which maintains that all families are basically the same and there is no reason for the state to favor one over the other.
Q: Can you tell us something about the current state of Ireland from a religious and social point of view?
Quinn: From being a country noted for a strong Catholic faith, Ireland has become far more secular. Admittedly, the Church could be authoritarian, but the old Catholic morality has been replaced with an increasingly virulent morality based on political correctness, which can be equally intolerant of dissenting opinions.
A good example of this is the resistance there is to any suggestion that all family forms are not the same in terms of their effect on their members.
For its part, Mass attendance, which only 20 years ago was as high as 80% of the population, is now as low as 50%, much less among the young. The Archdiocese of Dublin estimates that in some parts of the capital city, it has dipped below 10%.
The heavily individualistic morality now prevalent in Ireland is leading to serious social ills. For example, crime has risen dramatically in the past number of years, as have rates of suicide and drug and alcohol abuse.
Q: Family has always been a major part of Irish culture. Has this been similarly affected by recent changes?
Quinn: The family in Ireland is in increasing trouble. In 1986, for example, 37,000 people had separated from their spouses. By 2002, this had surged to 134,000, or 10% of all married persons. One-third of all children are now born outside of wedlock each year.
Q: How have politicians responded to this growing problem?
Quinn: Irish politicians and commentators are largely burying their heads in the sand on this issue. Marital breakdown is the problem they are incredibly reluctant to talk about. Meanwhile, policies which actively harm family life are in plentiful supply.
Q: Name some of these policies.
Quinn: One is called tax individualization. It treats couples as quite separate individuals, instead of jointly. It pretends they have little or no relationship with one another, and no condition of financial dependence.
This tax policy is supposed to encourage both spouses to go out into the workplace, but it penalizes stay-at-home parents in favor of double-income families. A second example are proposed new laws to give gay couples and cohabiting couples "marriagelike" rights. These are currently being considered by Ireland's lower house of Parliament.
Q: How does the Iona Institute propose to address these issues?
Quinn: By using the evidence. There is a growing consensus in the social sciences that traditional marriage works. Nearly all studies on this issue show that children fare markedly better when both their parents are married to each other, and worse in single-parent families and stepfamilies, although obviously there are plenty of exceptions. So the evidence is on our side.
This doesn't mean penalizing single parents, however. It just means recognizing what the research, and common sense, tell us, and following that through to its logical conclusion.
Q: So why haven't policy-makers already acted on this evidence?
Quinn: One reason, as I mentioned earlier, is that the family diversity view has no shortage of advocates. On the other hand, while there are still plenty of people who support marriage, no one is devising workable, politically realistic, pro-marriage policies.
The family diversity view has also succeeded in frightening many politicians away from pro-marriage positions. They are terrified of giving offense to people in non-marital ...
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Featured Today
- Monaco & The Vatican: Monaco's Grace Kelly Exhibit to Rome--A Review of Monegasque-Holy See Diplomatic History
- My Dad
- A Royal Betrayal: Catholic Monaco Liberalizes Abortion
- John Paul II as an Apostle of Mercy
- Embrace every moment as sacred time
- A Recession Antidote
- The Why of Jesus' Death: A Pauline Perspective
- Father Lombardi's Address on Catholic Media
- Pope's Words to Pontifical Latin American College
- Prelate: Genetics Needs a Conscience