Skip to main content


Immigration Schizophrenia - Interview With Archbishop Chaput

3/1/2007 - 6:00 AM PST

Advertisment

DENVER, Colorado, MAR. 01, 2007 (Zenit) - A get-tough attitude is not enough to stay the growing influx of undocumented workers in the United States, according to Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver.

The archbishop has witnessed the large growth of the Latino population in his see and insists that for an immigration policy to work, it must address the root, economic issues.

In this interview with us, Archbishop Chaput discusses the immigration situation in the United States, which he says Americans live "with a curious kind of schizophrenia."

Q: You have recently criticized the raid of undocumented workers that took place in three meatpacking plants in the Midwest in December, saying that these "dramatic, get-tough arrests" will not solve the immigration problem. Why not?

Archbishop Chaput: The U.S. immigration problem is systemic. Attacking the symptoms -- in this case, undocumented workers in a meatpacking plant -- does nothing to address the root cause, which is economic.

Some 40 million abortions and billions of contraceptives later, Americans have a work-force shortfall. Why is anyone surprised?

We want a strong economy and a good standard of living, but we also don't want to do a lot of the unpleasant jobs that help sustain that standard. So we live with a curious kind of schizophrenia. We need the "illegals," but we also want to complain about them.

Q: You also said that the immigration system in the United States has failed. In what sense? Are there any laws on the table with the new Congress that would effectively address these issues?

Archbishop Chaput: San Antonio's Archbishop José Gómez and others have pointed out that today's Latino immigrants are different in some important ways from the Irish, Italian and Polish immigrants of a century ago.

Many Latino immigrants neither want nor plan to settle here. They want to work for a while and then return home, and unlike previous generations of immigrants, they could actually do that if our system let them, because they don't need to cross an ocean.

The U.S. immigration machinery has no effective way of welcoming, licensing and tracking guest workers, and yet we need enormous numbers of them. I'd call that a failure.

As to the politics of the issue, I've been equally dissatisfied by both major political parties. Colorado's Democratic senator, Ken Salazar, and Arizona's Republican senator, John McCain, and others, have pushed some good legislation at the federal level, but overall, both the Democrats and the Republicans have played to the uglier qualities in America's mood when it comes to immigration issues.

Q: The United States gives out about 1 million "green cards" a year, yet more than 800,000 undocumented workers arrive illegally each year. Would it be fair to assume that part of the problem also lies with the economic and political situation in the immigrants' home countries? What responsibility should these countries assume for the large numbers of citizens leaving their borders?

Archbishop Chaput: That's an important point. Some people enjoy blaming the United States for nearly every problem, and, unfortunately, American policy has had a very mixed history in Latin America.

But until Latin American nations seriously reform their own legal and economic systems, they are co-responsible for the current crisis. Just pointing fingers at the United States isn't going to work. One of the implications of a hemispheric economy is that both sides of the border need to cooperate. Both sides of the border have duties.

Q: The federal government is insisting on the need to control immigration for security reasons. The Church, among others, has criticized some of the measures taken, such as the wall on the U.S.-Mexico border, because of the human toll it takes. How can we reconcile the need for security with a more humane treatment for those trying to enter?

Archbishop Chaput: The Church is most effective when she reminds people that punitive force alone can't work. For me, the debate over the border wall is really a debate over blunt-edged solutions.

The border wall is an icon for all sorts of other American contradictions. For example, we're trying to fight a war in Iraq with an obviously inadequate manpower pool, but Americans have no intention of making the sacrifices that would enlarge that pool in an equitable way.

Have you heard anyone seriously calling for conscription or mandatory national service, or vastly increasing military pay to encourage volunteers? I haven't. In a similar way, we want to "get tough" at the border, but are we really willing to militarize American life and spend the money it would take to shut down the immigrant flow? And what if we were? Have we really thought through the consequences for our economy?

At the same ...

1 | 2  Next Page

Rate This Article

Very Helpful Somewhat Helpful Not Helpful at All

Yes, I am Interested No, I am not Interested

Rate Article

1 - 3 of 3 Comments

  1. Irish Italian Throws
    8 months ago

    Nicely presented information in this post, I prefer to read this kind of stuff. The quality of content is fine and the conclusion is good. Thanks for the post.Irish Italian Throws

  2. Sara
    5 years ago

    This artical helped me wright a artical( which was published in the NewYork Times on Sunday May 12 or Mothrs Day) I would recomend this article to anyone who is interested in Americas immigratio policy. Thanks

  3. Sara
    5 years ago

    This interview helped me wright a satirical paper for Birmingham University (BYU) school paper, it helped alot Thanks!!!!!!!

Leave a Comment

Comments submitted must be civil, remain on-topic and not violate any laws including copyright. We reserve the right to delete any comments which are abusive, inappropriate or not constructive to the discussion.

Though we invite robust discussion, we reserve the right to not publish any comment which denigrates the human person, undermines marriage and the family, or advocates for positions which openly oppose the teaching of the Catholic Church.

This is a supervised forum and the Editors of Catholic Online retain the right to direct it.

We also reserve the right to block any commenter for repeated violations. Your email address is required to post, but it will not be published on the site.

We ask that you NOT post your comment more than once. Catholic Online is growing and our ability to review all comments sometimes results in a delay in their publication.

Send me important information from Catholic Online and it's partners. See Sample

Post Comment

Newsletter Sign Up

Daily Readings

Reading 1, Ephesians 2:12-22
do not forget, I say, that you were at that time separate from ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 85:9-10, 11-12, 13-14
His saving help is near for those who fear him, his glory will ... Read More

Gospel, Luke 12:35-38
'See that you have your belts done up and your lamps lit. Be ... Read More

Saint of the Day

October 21 Saint of the Day

St. Hilarion
October 21: Abbot and disciple of St. Anthony the Great, companion of St. ... Read More