Gender and Education
Boys and Girls Have Different Needs
By Father John Flynn
ROME, JAN. 19, 2007 (Zenit) - Advocates of separate education for boys and girls received support from a report published recently in England. In December, Ofsted, the government's inspectorate for children and learners in England, published a report titled, "2020 Vision." The document looked ahead to see what personalized teaching and learning might look like in schools 20 years into the new millennium.
The report supported the idea that boys should be taught separately to stop them falling further behind girls, reported the London-based Telegraph on Jan. 4.
The report itself contained a section commenting on the "gender gap" in the educational performance of boys and girls. This difference in performance has been shown to exist in many countries. A study published by the Program for International Student Assessment in 2000 showed that girls performed significantly better than boys on the reading test in all but one country. Mathematics also showed a gender gap -- in favor of boys -- although this was much smaller.
The reasons for the gap are complex, the Ofsted report observed. Research shows that even from a very early age boys place a greater value on believing themselves to be better at mathematics and science, and girls at reading and art. The differences in performance, however, can be countered by teaching methods that are specifically designed to help boys overcome their difficulties.
Moulsham High, for example, in Chelmsford, a town in southeast England, has been separating boys and girls in the first few years of school since the 1970s. And it has resulted in success for both boys and girls, reported the Telegraph in a separate article Jan. 4, as part of a series on single-sex schools.
"You only need to look at an 11-year-old boy to see that he is radically different to a girl of the same age and deserves to be treated so," Chris Nicholls, the head teacher, commented to the Telegraph.
Moulsham divides the sexes when pupils join the school at 11. Once they reach 14, they are mixed for some lessons, but for math, English and science, single-sex lessons are maintained.
Chelmsford County High School for Girls is a school with consistent success in single-sex education, reported the Telegraph on Jan. 11.
The school for girls aged 11-18, located in Essex county, outperformed every other school in England, according to results published last summer.
Glynis Howland, the school's acting head, told the newspaper that single-sex education was vital to girls to give them the best chance to develop.
Her argument about development was supported by an earlier report showing that it's not only a question of test results. Girls who attended single-sex schools go on to earn more in the world of work than those in mixed education, although they do no better in exams, reported the London-based Times newspaper Sept. 22.
Researchers at the Institute of Education's Center for Longitudinal Studies studied 13,000 people born in 1958. They found that by the age 16, girls educated in single-sex schools were more likely to study subjects that they enjoyed and were good at, rather than allowing gender stereotypes to influence their choice of subject.
This pattern continued at university and work, thus enabling the young women from girls' schools to enter areas of employment typically dominated by men, and in which salaries tended to be higher.
"Single-sex schools seemed more likely to encourage students to pursue academic paths according to their talents rather than their gender, whereas more gender-stereotyped choices were made in coeducational schools," said Alice Sullivan, co-author of the report.
Limits eased in U.S.
Positive results from separate education spurred changes in federal laws in the United States late last year. The Department of Education issued rules, taking effect Nov. 24, giving government schools more freedom to separate boys from girls in the classroom, the Associated Press reported Oct. 24.
"Some students may learn better in single-sex education environments," said Education Secretary Margaret Spellings. "These final regulations permit communities to establish single-sex schools and classes as another means of meeting the needs of students."
Previously, under rules in force since 1975, single-sex classes were only allowed in limited cases, such as sex education courses or gym classes. Now schools are able to offer separate classes if they believe it will offer educational benefits. Enrollment in a single-sex class will be voluntary.
The changes will also make it easier to institute single-sex schools, as long as local authorities can demonstrate that it also provides coed schools with ...
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Featured Today
- Monaco & The Vatican: Monaco's Grace Kelly Exhibit to Rome--A Review of Monegasque-Holy See Diplomatic History
- My Dad
- A Royal Betrayal: Catholic Monaco Liberalizes Abortion
- John Paul II as an Apostle of Mercy
- Embrace every moment as sacred time
- A Recession Antidote
- The Why of Jesus' Death: A Pauline Perspective
- Father Lombardi's Address on Catholic Media
- Pope's Words to Pontifical Latin American College
- Prelate: Genetics Needs a Conscience