Michael Novak on the Hunger for Liberty (Part 3 of 3)
On Europe's Lost Desire for Freedom
WASHINGTON, D.C., MAY 15, 2005 (Zenit) - As many Europeans have ceased to be faithful to Judaism and Christianity, they also have lost their taste both for liberty and for the God of liberty.
So says Michael Novak, author of "The Universal Hunger for Liberty: Why the Clash of Civilizations Is Not Inevitable" (Basic Books) and holder of the George Frederick Jewett Chair in Religion and Public Policy at the American Enterprise Institute.
He shared with us how Judaism and Christianity contributed the sharp taste of liberty and true human dignity to European identity.
Part 2 of this interview appeared Friday on Catholic Online.
Q: It can be persuasively argued that the nations of the West have lost their desire for liberty -- at least the European nations have. In Europe, government expansion and new forms of cultural and social despotism are on the rise. What is the source of this trend?
Novak: One answer is the welfare state, which displaces personal responsibility from the center of the political universe and replaces it with the "caring" state -- the "new soft despotism" predicted by Alexis de Tocqueville in "Democracy in America."
A deeper answer, perhaps, is the drama of atheistic humanism. If there is no God, what human beings do with their lives does not matter in the end. Nothing eternal is at stake -- nothing true or just or significant.
In a world of nihilism, or even relativism, comfort and convenience are as significant as liberty. To most people, they may be even more attractive. In Europe, it seems as if they are.
What Christianity and Judaism once contributed to European identity was a taste for the importance of how women and men use their personal liberty, either to be faithful to their God or to turn away from him. People could be unfaithful to God directly to his face, or indirectly through their betrayal of their duties to others.
At bottom, what Judaism and Christianity contributed to European identity, then, was the sharp taste of liberty -- the taste of true human dignity, trembling in the delicate balance of how humans decide to use their liberty.
As Europeans ceased to be faithful to Judaism and Christianity -- in the primacy of liberty, the Torah is at one with the New Testament -- they have lost their taste both for liberty and for the God of liberty. They have erected other, false gods.
More than we used to think, the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Jesus seems indispensable to the Western hunger for liberty. It seems empirically evident that secularism has precipitated the death of the hunger for liberty.
That is one reason why I argue that Muslims should not be pressed to pursue the path of secularism. On the contrary, we can see by the experience of the West -- and also the experience of Arab secular states -- that secularism withers liberty as winter withers the formerly green forests and fields. Secularism has no resources to arrest moral decadence, or the raw will-to-power.
The God of Abraham made women and men free. The God who created us created us free at the same time. That is the root of our hunger, our thirst, to be what we are meant to be. Liberty is a hunger and a thirst in all human creatures, even in those who have sought to still it, and kill it, in their own hearts.
Political history provides many proofs of the proposition that the hunger for liberty has a persistent historical power. The history of our own time is the most vivid lesson imaginable in the truth of this proposition.
Consider first the evidence since January 30 of this year. The courageous, ink-fingered election in Iraq followed upon the "Orange revolution" in Ukraine, which was followed in turn by the dynamic election in Palestine, the brave open demonstrations in Lebanon and yet other public demands in other nations.
Then think backward to the world of the year 1905. In many ways, the history of the 20th century was an attempt to impose tyranny in various forms upon the whole human race.
And yet, from a small handful of relatively free polities in 1905, the world has grown to well over 120 today -- not without world wars, not without immense struggle and not without continuing problems, but with undeniable effort, willingness to sacrifice and modest success.
Now the hunger for liberty is slowly sweeping through the Muslim world -- not least in the Arab countries -- as well as the Muslim nations of the "soft underbelly" of the former Soviet Union, the countries whose names end in "-stan."
In this sense, my book, written in 2003, has already begun to be vindicated by events. Its hypothesis -- and the reasons given for it -- seems far more in touch with reality today than they did when they were ...
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Featured Today
- Monaco & The Vatican: Monaco's Grace Kelly Exhibit to Rome--A Review of Monegasque-Holy See Diplomatic History
- My Dad
- A Royal Betrayal: Catholic Monaco Liberalizes Abortion
- John Paul II as an Apostle of Mercy
- Embrace every moment as sacred time
- A Recession Antidote
- The Why of Jesus' Death: A Pauline Perspective
- Father Lombardi's Address on Catholic Media
- Pope's Words to Pontifical Latin American College
- Prelate: Genetics Needs a Conscience