Man-Woman Relationship Is Not a Rivalry
Archbishop Amato on New Document of Doctrinal Congregation
VATICAN CITY, AUG. 20, 2004 (Zenit) - The differences between men and women are not to be reasons for rivalry, but rather are the foundation of a collaborative relationship, says a recent Church document.
This is the central proposal of the "Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Collaboration Between Man and Woman in the Church and the World," published July 31 by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
In an interview with Vatican Radio, Archbishop Angelo Amato, secretary of the doctrinal congregation, explains the reasons for the document.
Q: After John Paul II's "Mulieris Dignitatem," 1988, and the "Letter to Women," 1995, what is new about woman in this intervention of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith?
Archbishop Amato: The novelty is in the response to two tendencies that are well delineated in contemporary culture.
The first tendency strongly underlines woman's condition of subordination, who, in order to be herself, should present herself as antagonistic to man. What is envisioned, therefore, is a radical rivalry between the sexes, according to which, the identity and role of one party constitutes a disadvantage for the other.
To avoid this opposition, a second current tends to eliminate the differences between the two sexes. The physical difference, called "sex," is minimized and considered as a simple effect of sociocultural conditionings. What is emphasized to the maximum, therefore, is the strictly cultural dimension, called "gender."
This is the origin of the controversy over the natural character of the family, made up of a father and mother, of equating homosexuality and heterosexuality, of proposing a multiform sexuality.
Q: What is the origin of this last tendency?
Archbishop Amato: This point of view stems from the presupposition that human nature does not have in itself characteristics that determine it in an absolute way as man or woman. Because of this, every person, free from all biological predetermination, could become whatever he or she pleases.
In the face of these erroneous conceptions, the Church confirms some essential aspects of Christian anthropology based on revelation in sacred Scripture.
Q: And what does the Bible say about this?
Archbishop Amato: The lengthiest part of the document is dedicated precisely to offering a biblical mediation on texts regarding the creation of man and woman.
The first text, Genesis 1:1-2:4, describes the creative power of God who fashions the distinctions in the original chaos -- light, darkness, sea, earth, plants, animals -- finally creating the human being "in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them."
Also the second account of creation, Genesis 2:4-25, confirms the essential importance of the sexual difference. God puts woman by the side of Adam, the first man, created from his very flesh and enveloped in the same mystery.
Q: What does this mean?
Archbishop Amato: The biblical text gives important indications. The human being is a person, in the same measure man and woman. They are in a reciprocal relationship.
In the second place, the human body, marked by the stamp of masculinity and of femininity, is called to exist in communion and in reciprocal gift. Because of this, marriage is the first and fundamental dimension of this vocation.
In the third place, although changed and obscured by sin, these original dispositions of the Creator can never be annulled.
Biblical anthropology suggests, therefore, that one must address with an attitude of relationship and not of competition, the problems that at the public or private level affect the differences of sex.
Q: Does the document give other indications?
Archbishop Amato: The letter also offers theological considerations on the spousal dimension of salvation.
In the Old Testament, for example, a history of salvation is configured that brings into play the participation of the masculine and the feminine, through the metaphors of bridegroom-bride and of covenant. It is a nuptial vocabulary that orients the reader both to the masculine figure of the suffering servant and the feminine figure of Zion.
In the New Testament these representations find their fulfillment: on one hand, in Mary, chosen daughter of Zion, who recapitulates the condition of Israel-bride in expectation of the day of salvation; on the other hand, in Jesus, who recapitulates in his person the love of God for his people, as the love of a bridegroom for his bride.
St. Paul develops this nuptial sense of redemption, conceiving Christian life as a nuptial mystery between ...
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Featured Today
- Monaco & The Vatican: Monaco's Grace Kelly Exhibit to Rome--A Review of Monegasque-Holy See Diplomatic History
- My Dad
- A Royal Betrayal: Catholic Monaco Liberalizes Abortion
- John Paul II as an Apostle of Mercy
- Embrace every moment as sacred time
- A Recession Antidote
- The Why of Jesus' Death: A Pauline Perspective
- Father Lombardi's Address on Catholic Media
- Pope's Words to Pontifical Latin American College
- Prelate: Genetics Needs a Conscience