Skip to main content


Man bites dog

5/30/2004 - 6:30 AM PST

Advertisment

By Fr. William Maestri
Director of Communications
Archdiocese of New Orleans

In the genre of “man bites dog” we have been informed by the Washington Post that “Forty-eight Roman Catholic members of Congress have warned… that U.S. bishops will revive anti-Catholic bigotry and severely harm the church…” And what might the bishops have to do to bring this about? Simple: act like bishops.

What have made these “48” so concerned for the future of the Catholic Church are the words and actions of some bishops. To be specific: some bishops have dared to instruct Catholic politicians on their moral obligations to respect human life and work for the common good. Those Catholic politicians who support anti-life legislation are committing a grave moral wrong. These politicians should not present themselves for Holy Communion so as not to further endanger their salvation and cause scandal. Some bishops have indicated they would withhold Holy Communion. Other bishops have placed the responsibility on the politicians.

The “48” sent a letter to Cardinal Theodore McCarrick of Washington, D.C., basically telling the bishops how to be bishops, and secondly, demanding that they stop trying to influence votes. What has escaped the “48” is that an essential part of Episcopal ministry is teaching. Such teaching includes life issues which often involve the political. It is not that the bishops are telling politicians how to vote, rather, bishops are instructing Catholics (who happen to be politicians) on grave moral issues.

The “48” believe that they are immune from Catholic teaching. They are subject to a higher calling, namely, the Constitution of the United States. The hierarchy of our judicial church—the Supreme Court—has replace the hierarchy of the Catholic Church. The “48” have informed McCarrick that the Supreme Court gave women the right to an abortion. In light of this ruling, legislators “who vote for legislation consistent with that mandate are not acting contrary to our positions as faithful members of the Catholic Church.”

Really! The “48” believe that their obligation to a court ruling and the Constitution trumps natural moral law, Revelation and Catholic teaching on the life issues. How can one be a faithful Catholic while supporting those rulings, “laws”, and policies which are anti-life? One cannot be.

The mandate of a court ruling that is in direct conflict with the teachings of the Church should never claim our allegiance. In fact, Catholic politicians have a grave duty to undo anti-life legislation and court rulings. The natural moral law must be that which guides the enacting of positive law.

Unfortunately, the reigning legal philosophy at work in our country is a positivism (or judicialism) which recognizes only the will of the legislator or judge. Our legal culture (comprised of professionals and citizens) has forgotten that tradition which viewed human laws and constitutions in light of first principles of universal justice and natural rights. The “48” have bought into a legal positivism which recognizes no higher law. In this view, if the court, a constitution, or legislature rules or enacts law, they are valid by the sheer fact they have been enacted.

The bishops are clearly appealing to a higher source and truth. The bishops are challenging Catholic politicians to welcome this truth in their work for justice and the common good. Rather than seeing what the bishops are doing as an unwelcome intrusion, Catholic politicians should welcome this Episcopal ministry as a blessing. Talk about “man biting dog.”

Contact

Archdiocese of New Orleans
http://www.truth-way.org/Catholicism&Culture5.28.htm  LA, US
Fr. William Maestri - Director of Communications, 504 596-3023

Email

communications@archdiocese-no.org

Keywords

Bishops and politicians

Rate This Article

Very Helpful Somewhat Helpful Not Helpful at All

Yes, I am Interested No, I am not Interested

Rate Article

1 - 1 of 1 Comments

  1. Mike Petrik
    4 years ago

    I think the juxtaposition of natural law and constitutional law is unnecessary. There is no need to examine a representative's duty in the event his constitutional obligations should conflict with natural law, because neither public funding of abortion nor ObamaCare is constitutionally required, even under lawless Roe.

Leave a Comment

Comments submitted must be civil, remain on-topic and not violate any laws including copyright. We reserve the right to delete any comments which are abusive, inappropriate or not constructive to the discussion.

Though we invite robust discussion, we reserve the right to not publish any comment which denigrates the human person, undermines marriage and the family, or advocates for positions which openly oppose the teaching of the Catholic Church.

This is a supervised forum and the Editors of Catholic Online retain the right to direct it.

We also reserve the right to block any commenter for repeated violations. Your email address is required to post, but it will not be published on the site.

We ask that you NOT post your comment more than once. Catholic Online is growing and our ability to review all comments sometimes results in a delay in their publication.

Send me important information from Catholic Online and it's partners. See Sample

Post Comment


Newsletter Sign Up

Daily Readings

Reading 1, Jeremiah 26:1-9
At the beginning of the reign of Jehoiakim son of Josiah, king ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 69:6, 8-10, 14
Those who hope in you must not be made fools of, Yahweh ... Read More

Gospel, Matthew 13:54-58
and, coming to his home town, he taught the people in their ... Read More

Saint of the Day

August 1 Saint of the Day

St. Alphonsus Marie Liguori
August 1: Bishop, Doctor of the Church, and the founder of the ... Read More