Dignity, not utility, must govern bioethics, says Catholic speaker in Stanford talk
PALO ALTO, CA (Catholic San Francisco) - Human dignity rises above all other considerations in biomedical research and health care and must govern ethical decisions in the lab and at the bedside, Dr. Edmund Pellegrino, the chairman of the President’s Council on Bioethics, told Stanford law students April 9.
Addressing students in a classroom at Stanford Law School, Dr. Pellegrino made a forceful claim for the inescapability of dignity - the lived experience of being human — for anyone making ethical choices in research, in the clinic and in general biology.
“Wherever you start, wherever you go, you’ll have to come back to either accepting the notion or denying it utterly, and then we can weigh out for you the implications of denying that to a human being,” Dr. Pellegrino said.
“There are too many examples in the world’s history of the denigration of the special nature of being human,” he said. “I can only mention the Holocaust. It’s a reality then — a value you must deal with.”
State-funded embryo destruction
Dr. Pellegrino did not address human embryonic stem cell research directly, but his appearance came just four days after an advisory group to the state-funded California Institute for Regenerative Medicine recommended issuing $262 million in Proposition 71 funds for stem-cell research facilities. Stanford is in line to receive $47.5 million, which would be the largest grant among the 12 the panel is proposing.
In January, the institute, the world’s largest funder of human embryonic stem-cell research, criticized President Bush for what it called a misleading assessment of stem cell research in his state of the union address. The institute said human embryonic stem cells are the “gold standard” for research and that safe alternatives for human studies will not be ready in the foreseeable future because of safety concerns.
“Therefore it is critical that all avenues of stem-cell research be aggressively advanced,” the institute said.
The Catholic Church condemns human embryonic stem cell research because the work involves the destruction of days-old embryos to obtain the cells. Surplus embryos from in-vitro fertilization clinics are one source of the embryos used in research. The Church supports other avenues of stem cell research that do not destroy life.
Henry T. Greeley, a Stanford law professor who chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, addressed the Stanford class after Dr. Pellegrino. He said he has some sympathy for an ethical theory that goes beyond individual autonomy but argued that proponents of dignity have not made a suitably rigorous case.
“I don’t see why the human species as a whole is inherently entitled to dignity,” he said. “If it turns out we encounter non-human persons, either biological, mechanical or computational, earthly or alien, I think dignity should apply to them as well. Furthermore, the idea that the species as a whole has some essence that shouldn’t be violated strikes me as way too abstract.”
A third panelist, David Magnus, an associate professor of pediatrics at Stanford Medical School, said the council’s new book constitutes a rejection of academic bioethics in favor of more attention to religion and efforts to probe deeper questions of human dignity and human nature. He said the book brings out a fundamental tension between those who are theologically inclined and those who are less so.
Magnus wondered whether two types of dignity could be articulated, one arising from human nature and another governing threats to dignity in the lived experience. He cited what he said was the factual example of a gravely ill infant who was being maintained on life support at the request of the family but whose plight was deeply troubling to the caregivers. Nurses and social workers felt the treatment was unethical.
“It was hard to see what they were saying except in the sense that the human dignity of the child was being violated, the sense that even though the patient doesn’t feel pain, the patient’s dignity is being violated. Its spirit is being injured.”
In questions posed to the panelists after the discussion, a student said the principle of autonomy tends to be worked out in a “very thin way.”
“I see human dignity as trying to fill out something we all yearn for,” the student said, addressing Greeley.
In response, Greeley said, “If we’re going to use it we better have a very good idea of what it means. Otherwise I’m reluctant to sign on to it.”
This story was made available to Catholic Online by permission of Catholic San Francisco (www.catholic-sf.org),official newspaper of the Archdiocese of San Francisco, Calif.
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Diocese News
- Newman Centers are anchor of faith at public colleges
- A Pinprick to Revive Devotion
- Family celebration: Utah women travel to India to meet with sponsored children
- Deportation of Wis. eighth-grader reveals immigration policy's painful side to class
- Mandatory drug testing to be implemented in Oklahoma City Catholic high schools
- Catechesis of the Good Shepherd ‘hands-on’ religious education gets a look in Texas
- Food versus fuel: Is biofuel production to blame for our present food shortage?
- Spirituality key to the dying patient’s ‘quality of life,’ says Catholic doctor
- Bioethics battle is between contrary visions of the human person, says Rome professor
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?