Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Dr. Frederick Liewehr

3/25/2013 (1 year ago)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

The Lord commanded us to, 'Be fruitful and multiply'. To borrow the title from the 1960's television show, 'Father Knows Best'.

To hear what calls itself the Left these days, talk, one would think that children were a form of sexually transmitted disease, like AIDS, against which science and society must join together to fight. How in the world did we ever get to this point? The West is at a critical juncture due to its failure to procreate, and our Social Security System is failing for exactly this reason.Although wrong, dead, and gone, Malthus is not forgotten

Highlights

By Dr. Frederick Liewehr

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

3/25/2013 (1 year ago)

Published in Marriage & Family

Keywords: population, population control, culture of death, Thomas Malthus, Paul Ehrlich, anti-life, malthusian, family planning, Frederick Liewehr


RICHMOND, VA (Catholic Online) - To hear what calls itself the Left these days, talk, one would think that children were a form of sexually transmitted disease, like AIDS, against which science and society must join together to fight. How in the world did we ever get to this point?

It is hard to know when offspring stopped being a blessing and started being a burden, but it certainly was not in the early days of our country. We were an agrarian nation, and there was work to be done, so the more hands available, the better. Children performed chores around the farm and thus were economically productive members of the family. As long as and wherever these conditions persisted, children were and are considered a boon to the lucky parents.

In 1798, however, Thomas Malthus published his treatise An Essay on the Principle of Population. He wrote to reject the idea of some of the Enlightenment philosophes that society was improving, and instead said that in good times, such as they were experiencing, man would overpopulate beyond the capability of the earth to produce food to sustain the growing population, leading to misery and starvation. He explained, "We will suppose the means of subsistence in any country just equal to the easy support of its inhabitants. The constant effort towards population... increases the number of people before the means of subsistence are increased. The food, therefore, which before supported seven millions must now be divided among seven millions and a half or eight millions. The poor consequently must live much worse, and many of them be reduced to severe distress."

How would all of this come about? It wouldn't be pretty. "The power of population is so superior to the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man, that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race. The vices of mankind are active and able ministers of depopulation. They are the precursors in the great army of destruction, and often finish the dreadful work themselves. But should they fail in this war of extermination, sickly seasons, epidemics, pestilence, and plague advance in terrific array, and sweep off their thousands and tens of thousands. Should success be still incomplete, gigantic inevitable famine stalks in the rear, and with one mighty blow levels the population with the food of the world".

But never mind; he had some answers to this problem: positive checks, those that increase the death rate; and preventive ones, those that lower the birth rate. Positive checks include hunger, disease and war; preventive checks include abortion, birth control, prostitution, postponement of marriage and celibacy.

Since this treatise was written over 200 years ago, you may be wondering when we are going to experience this cataclysm. The answer of course it that we have not experienced it, and we do not have to experience it. Malthus was prey to zero-sum thinking, the same thinking that is prevalent in much of leftist thought today, "If you make more money than me, it is because you are taking it away from me", not because your economic activity created more wealth. In this case, if the population increases, why would the food supply remain the same? Why wouldn't more land be cultivated, more seed be planted, better seed be developed, more efficient farming methods be employed, and on and on? In 1800, the world population was about 1 billion people; today it stands at over 7 billion. Indeed, a major problem for us, and for much of the developed world, is obesity, not starvation.

"But," you say, "starvation DOES exist; we see starving people on the news all the time. Yes, it does, but it is not due to a large population. The USA population density is 28 people per square kilometer, Japan's is 340, the Netherlands' is 404, and Hong Kong's is 6396, and Singapore's is a whopping 7,301. These folks are not starving. Libya has a population density of 3.1, Somalia's is 12, the Sudan's is 15, and Ethiopia's is 60, not anywhere approaching  that of most of Europe or Asia, yet with a chronic and recurring problem of starvation. Clearly population density is not the problem.

The real problem is that famine is caused by governments - civil wars and corruption that interferes with the distribution of food. Absence of property rights, price controls and other socialist schemes starve millions unnecessarily every year. Some will claim that the problem is the environment of the country, that lack of arable land or too much or too little rainfall or some other natural limitations produce these recurrent problems. No country has a monopoly on good or bad climate or other natural resources; man has the ingenuity to overcome natural obstacles - the Dutch have been using dikes and windmills for hundreds of years. One has only to compare Haiti to the Dominican Republic, two halves of the same island, to see the effect of corrupt government.

But, although wrong, dead, and gone, Malthus is not forgotten. One of his more recent disciples was Paul Ehrlich, who wrote The Population Bomb in 1968, essentially parroting Malthus' mistakes. Ehrlich began his book with the statement, "The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now. At this late date nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate ... "  He thought it was too late to avoid Malthusian disasters such as severe famines, the spread of disease, social unrest, and other negative consequences of overpopulation, but for those who survived he advocated Malthus' preventive solutions, the easiest possible availability of birth control and abortions.

In his 1977 textbook, Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment, he said, "A far better choice, in our view, is to expand the use of milder methods of influencing family size preferences, while redoubling efforts to ensure that the means of birth control, including abortion and sterilization, are accessible to every human being on Earth within the shortest possible time." Clearly the United States was NOT involved in famine or any food shortages in the 1970's or thereafter, but amazingly this man is still at Stanford University and continues to perform policy research concerning population and resource issues, and promote his positive solutions of birth control and abortion. Bad ideas apparently die hard.

What is hard to understand is that both these men have been proven wrong, and should have become laughing stocks. But they didn't. Instead, their ideas, and the policies that stem from their positive solutions to a nonexistent problem have become part of the mantra of the left, and have sadly become part of our culture. Still, Malthus wrote his treatise in 1800, and you did not see a precipitous fall in family size until over 150 years later. Why was that the case?

Traditionally there were two reasons that people had children. One was that God instituted marriage to create families where parents could produce and raise children, thus sustaining and reproducing themselves and the human race. These families were the basic unit of society, which banded together to form tribes for mutual protection, and then developed governments. In our increasingly secular society today, the government feels free to dictate what is the basic unit of society, which apparently will be the "household", consisting of whatever combination of sexes the government decides is licit. The other reason people had children was because God endowed them with a strong sex drive that was to be coupled with marital vows in a sacramental union.

Therefore, what has happened is a decoupling of that marital union. In the 1960's convenient contraception for the first time pulled the rug from under God's plan for people to be fruitful and multiply. Soon, not having children was seen as a "right", which was actually a product of radical individualism, which is basically the drastic reduction of limits to personal gratification. Individualism was always a feature of classical liberalism, on which our country was founded, but it was kept in check and prevented from becoming pure hedonism by religion, morality, and law based on the first two. It is understandable in view of the general debasement of society that has taken place since the 1960's that we now have more cohabitation, more divorces, a huge number of fatherless children, millions murdered in abortion facilities creating a culture of death, and increased crime and general social malaise as a result. What is not clear, however, is why our married, stable families are often failing to reproduce themselves by having no children, or at most one or two.

There are many reasons for this phenomenon. People marry later than they used to, and wait until they feel financially secure and emotionally mature before having children, so that their reproductive years do not last long enough to have many children. There can be many other reasons why this occurs, but they have always been the case. The question is, why do so many people nowadays say, "I don't want to have any kids"?

Again, there can be many reasons why this may be the case, but in general they can be attributed to the same radical individualism that is everywhere seen in our society today. Children are simply not convenient. Abortion of course is the ultimate form of individualism, where a mother decides that her body is her own to do with as she pleases, and she has the right to snuff out the life that is temporarily sharing it with her. Not having children when there is not a compelling reason not to is the same in kind, though not in degree. Although the Church condones Natural Family Planning, it does so only providing there is a grave reason not to have children. Examples can be given, which include the mother's health, temporary economic crisis, etc., but these are generally assumed to be temporary. NFP with the goal of having no children is not morally acceptable. Marriage is a sacrament between a man and a woman, and their mutual commitment is required, but the fruit of that union needs to be children.

There is no question that society makes having children today expensive. Think what sort of a vehicle you would need to buy if you have many small children, each of whom must be belted into a bomb-proof car seat the size and weight of a floor safe. People assume that they must pay more than their house is worth to send each child to the college of his choice, after 18 years of electronic gadgets, clothes, cars, and luxury that would have made Louis XIV envious. But all that is not necessary. Recently, opera star Andrea Bocelli thanked his mother for not aborting him when she was medically advised to do so because he might be born with a deformity, despite the fact that he is blind. Similarly, would children regret being born because you could not afford to give them all iPhones and send them to Ivy League schools?

Young couples, talk to your parents about this. If you come from a large family, ask them about the decisions they made, and how things worked out, though you pretty much know the answer! If you come from a small family, ask your folks how they feel now, and if they would have done anything differently. It would be rare indeed to find older parents who wish they didn't have kids to come to visit them, while lonely old people are sadly everywhere. The West is at a critical juncture due to its failure to procreate, and our Social Security System is failing for exactly this reason. We no longer have enough young people to help support their aging parents who no longer can support themselves. This economic reality coupled with radical individualism and hedonism means that euthanasia and the famed "death panels" of obamacare are already being openly discussed. These "final solutions" were never even considered before, but then, neither was contraception prior to the Episcopalian Lambeth Conference in 1930.

The Lord commanded us to, "Be fruitful and multiply". To borrow the title from the 1960's television show, "Father Knows Best".

----------

Dr. Frederick Liewehr is an endodontist who teaches and works in private practice. He converted from Protestantism to Catholicism in 1983, having been drawn ineluctably to Christ's Church by the light of Truth. He is a member of St. Benedict parish in Richmond, a Fourth Degree Knight of Columbus and a Cooperator of Opus Dei.
 

---


Pope Francis: end world hunger through 'Prayer and Action'


2014 - Distributed by THE NEWS CONSORTIUM

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for January 2015
General Intention:
That those from diverse religious traditions and all people of good will may work together for peace.
Missionary Intention: That in this year dedicated to consecrated life, religious men and women may rediscover the joy of following Christ and strive to serve the poor with zeal.



Comments


More Marriage & Family

Heartwarming footage of selfless man risking his own life to save a stranded dog restores faith in humanity Watch

Image of Hearts stop as the fate of the dog and rescuer become unclear. Will they make it back up the bridge?

By Abigail James (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Stranded on a small island on a Nisava River in Serbia, a helpless dog hides in dead bushes accepting his fate. A group of caring friends notice the dog, and set up a mission to rescue the abandoned dog. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - "On my way home I met a few ... continue reading


Caught on tape: Hilarious standoff between father and toddler daughter goes viral Watch

Image of

By Abigail James (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Parenting a toddler can be quite a difficult task. They're stubborn, sassy and are developing a personality of their own. Gareth Roe, an Irish father, knows firsthand how complicated toddlers can be after experiencing a humorous argument with his 15-month-old daughter, ... continue reading


Undeniably cute rendition of classic children's song is sure to put a smile on your face Watch

Image of Josie sings an adorable song to her father.

By Abigail James (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

In the midst of war, terror and disease, it's important to take the time to smile and remember that some of the world is good. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - An adorable toddler melts hearts with her spunky rendition of classic children's song "Old McDonald." ... continue reading


Mother of quadruplets tragically dies without ever seeing her four miracles Watch

Image of Erica Morales, 36-years-old, tragically passed away hours after giving birth to quadruplets.

By Abigail James (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Just hours after giving birth to quadruplets, Arizona mother, Erica Morales, died. "She never got to hold them, she never got to see them," cried Morales' cousin, Nicole Todman to Fox10. "It is so hard to know she fought so hard for her children. She will never get to ... continue reading


Archbishop of San Francisco warns of coming war on marriage Watch

Image of The Archbishop of San Francisco, Salvatore Cordileone, warned of a growing war on the

By Matt Waterson (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

On January 16, the Archbishop of San Francisco, Salvatore Cordileone, warned of a growing war on the "essential meaning of marriage," as defining "a bond which unites a man and a woman to each other and to any children who come from their union." LOS ANGELES, CA ... continue reading


One... two... three babies?! New mother gets shocking surprise in ultrasound Watch

Image of Boe, Mika and Hope love to cuddle. (Magic Moments SWNS.com)

By Abigail James (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Imagine hoping for one child, and being told you're pregnant with triplets; this was the case for British mother of now four, Melanie Thornton. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Melanie had a happy life with just her 13-year-old daughter and husband. Her husband, ... continue reading


Do you know what your kids are putting online? Here are 30 text acronyms that your teen DOES NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW Watch

Image of Teens have an entire code for keeping parents clueless about their activities.

By Matt Waterson (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

In this new age of easy, fast and discrete communication the English language has rapidly evolved in a way that may leave many older people at a loss. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Acronyms rule the digital airwaves, being all important in the world of ... continue reading


14 years later: Extreme and horrific child abuse victim, Lauren Kavanaugh, thrives Watch

Image of Lauren Kavanaugh, now 21-years-old, attends college and plans on becoming a counselor to help those going through similar situations as hers.

By Abigail James (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Routinely raped and tortured, Lauren Kavanaugh was forced to live in a 4ft by 9ft closet for five years of her life until she was rescued in 2001. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Now 21-years-old, Lauren lives the "normal" life of a college student aspiring to make ... continue reading


Should marriage be defined by the legal system? The Supreme Court may aim to change the textbook definition of marriage Watch

Image of The U.S. Supreme Court may decide on same-sex marriage, as early as June of this year.

By Matt Waterson (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

What is the definitive definition of marriage? Is it only a union before God between men and women, or is it extended to same-sex couples as well? This is a question that may be legally decided by the Supreme Court, which is set to decide soon if it will take up ... continue reading


The Reality of Marriage: The Lifelong Union of One Man and One Woman Watch

Image of

By Deacon Frederick K. Bartels

Marriage is a unique reality. There is no possibility of redefining it, shaping it in a new and essentially different way, or altering its nature, since marriage is authored by God and woven into the fabric of human life. The reality of marriage is the permanent union ... continue reading


All Marriage & Family News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Daily Readings

Reading 1, Deuteronomy 18:15-20
15 Yahweh your God will raise up a prophet like me; ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 95:1-2, 6-7, 7-9
1 Come, let us cry out with joy to Yahweh, acclaim ... Read More

Gospel, Mark 1:21-28
21 They went as far as Capernaum, and at once on the ... Read More

Reading 2, First Corinthians 7:32-35
32 I should like you to have your minds free from all ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for February 1st, 2015 Image

St. Brigid of Ireland
February 1: Brigid was probably born at Faughart near Dundalk, Louth, ... Read More

Inform, Inspire & Ignite Logo

Find Catholic Online on Facebook and get updates right in your live feed.

Become a fan of Catholic Online on Facebook


Follow Catholic Online on Twitter and get News and Product updates.

Follow us on Twitter