Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Marshall Connolly, Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

6/25/2014 (2 years ago)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

I'm still a believer, but the experience was uncomfortable and enlightening.

I had a distressing Monday that I have not yet written about. A report in the Telegraph quoted a blogger who claimed to have evidence that NASA and NOAA falsified climate data to show the planet is warming when in reality it's actually cooling. It gave me an opportunity to think skeptically on the science of global warming.

It would be very upsetting to learn all this is a lie.

It would be very upsetting to learn all this is a lie.

Highlights

By Marshall Connolly, Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

6/25/2014 (2 years ago)

Published in Green

Keywords: NASA, NOAA, climate, data, faked, scandal, beliefs


LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Nobody likes cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance is the cause of the mental stress and anguish you feel when you are presented with evidence that conflicts with one of your core beliefs.

For example, one of my core beliefs is in God, and the Catholic Church. When people attempt to present me with evidence that I am wrong about my belief in God, or the truth of my Church, I don't like it. Fortunately, I am always able to refute their delusions, or their attacks are unsupported with evidence, but it can be a distinctly uncomfortable experience.

Likewise, I also believe in the power of science to describe the laws of nature and the set of circumstances that surround us. My trust -or faith in science is another one of my core beliefs. I believe that the method of doing science, over the long run, reveals the truth, or at least brings us closer to the truth. This doesn't mean scientists are always right, in fact, they're commonly wrong. But over time, they develop a consensus and that consensus should be trusted as long as it is always tested.

Anthropogenic climate change is one of those consensuses, always challenged by one courageous researcher or another, but always withstanding the contrarian.

A key conclusion of science is that the planet is warming due to man-made activity. Now I'm no climatologist and although I've done a lot of reading and several interviews, I have not done my own empirical research, for a myriad of practical reasons. However, I trust the consensus.

But what happens if that consensus, as well-intentioned as I believe it to be, is based on fudged data (lies)?

It's hard to imagine that every scientist on the planet has some evil agenda and is seeking to lie to the world about global warming to secure grant money and funding from world governments, or to engineer a brave new world in accord with their perverse desires. Indeed, this isn't how scientists make their reputation. Scientists don't get points for following the herd, but rather they win Nobels by forging their own path into the unknown and proving that the herd is wrong. But when no scientist can do this, then it suggests to me that the herd is probably right.

Now a question: how many of those scientists rely on NASA and NOAA data for their research? Probably a lot of them. And if someone at the top is fudging the data that so many others use, then they have a lot of power to abuse.

So, last week when a much respected news source like The Telegraph, was aggregated by Drudge, and several links appeared on Drudge, I made a point to read all of them. After reading the Telegraph report that suggested the NASA and NOAA data could be badly flawed, I was pretty upset. Here was evidence which challenged my core belief.

Like any good group-thinker, I immediately searched for additional sources to deny the claim. I found none, at least at first. It seems nobody wanted to confirm my bias so I was left with a pile of evidence in my lap and a spoon to eat it with.

It tasted a lot like crow.

But there was a problem. The conclusion came from only one source, Steven Goddard from "Real Science." In addition to this blog, only The Telegraph ran with the story. Even the sometimes fast-and-loose Daily Mail seemed to shy away from it.

(NOTE: Breitbart also ran the story, quoting The Telegraph.)

The other sources were all rewrites. Even a brazen report from yesterday's "New American" parroted Goddard's claim that the scientists were lying from the start, deliberately falsifying data by changing historical temperature records.

The flag for me was that only one blogger was making this claim and no major news outlet was picking up the story, Telegraph aside.

A day later, my eyebrows were raised by Anthony Watts who told Reason.com he was critical of Goddard's claim. Watts is known for his skeptical blog, "What's Up With That?" WUWT commonly "debunks" global warming claims.

Here was Goddard's claim via Christopher Brooker in The Telegraph:

"Goddard shows how, in recent years, NOAA's [National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's] US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been "adjusting" its record by replacing real temperatures with data "fabricated" by computer models. The effect of this has been to downgrade earlier temperatures and to exaggerate those from recent decades, to give the impression that the Earth has been warming up much more than is justified by the actual data. In several posts headed "Data tampering at USHCN/GISS", Goddard compares the currently published temperature graphs with those based only on temperatures measured at the time. These show that the US has actually been cooling since the Thirties, the hottest decade on record; whereas the latest graph, nearly half of it based on "fabricated" data, shows it to have been warming at a rate equivalent to more than 3 degrees centigrade per century."

Then Watts replied by saying that Goddard "made major errors in his analysis." Needless to say, I was shocked, although I was also secretly pleased to see Watt's response, which improves his integrity in my opinion. I can respect a person with whom I disagree, especially when I see them display intellectual honesty.

Since last week, mainstream sources have responded to Goddard, revealing that indeed, his methods were flawed and his conclusions wrong. Not everybody has got the word yet, but that's just how information propagates. We naturally listen to the information we like (confirmation bias) and we actively seek to dismiss the information that makes us uncomfortable.

My initial reactions to Goddard's claim were denial, then anger. I was angry at the possibility that the scientific establishment could be hoaxing us all based on falsified data. However, this is highly unlikely.

Despite the importance of NASA and NOAA data in current research, there are independent sources for the same data. Every nation has its own meteorologists, climatologists and researchers. They're doing their own science and not all of them are getting grants from leftist governments with an agenda to return humanity to the Stone Age. Furthermore, science is peer reviewed and any scientists that can get a contrary view published scores on the tenure track, so there's incentive to buck the consensus and debunk bad science.

Also, it's very hard to cover up massive conspiracies. One of the best arguments against the U.S. government staging the 9/11 attacks is the government's own inability to keep such a thing quiet. We know the government wasn't actively involved in any way because we would have learned otherwise, likely even before it happened. Now imagine how hard it would be to keep the secret of a global climate change hoax from the world when the keepers of the secret are spread across every nation, every political stripe and every philosophy and motivation.

In fact, scientists are so assured that they're right on this one thing that at least one of them has offered a $10,000 cash prize to anyone who can prove, scientifically, that global warming isn't happening. Well, there you go commenters, there's $10,000 free for the taking if you can prove your point is true.

It is rare that you can get scientists to agree with such consensus on most things. Science is filled with factions and their feuds. However they sometimes agree on basic facts. One of those facts is that AGW is happening and that it is a significant threat to our society as it is structured today. If we accept the word of a lone blogger over that of the scientific community as a whole, then we reveal our own biases for the world to see and we would do well to reconsider our conclusions, despite the discomfort doing so will bring.

---


Pope Francis: end world hunger through 'Prayer and Action'


Copyright 2016 - Distributed by THE CALIFORNIA NETWORK

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for June 2016
Universal:
Human Solidarity: That the aged, marginalized, and those who have no one may find-even within the huge cities of the world-opportunities for encounter and solidarity.
Evangelization: Seminarians and Novices: That seminarians and men and women entering religious life may have mentors who live the joy of the Gospel and prepare them wisely for their mission.



Comments


More Green

Greenland just lost ONE TRILLION tonnes of ice Watch

Image of Researchers survey melting on Greenland.

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Greenland is melting faster than expected, as new data reveals. The ESA's Cryosat satellite has revealed Greenland lost over a trillion tonnes of ice between 2011 and 2014. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - Greenland has lost over a trillion metric tons (tonnes) ... continue reading


Why does ExxonMobil continue to spend millions on climate denial? Watch

Image of Exxon has been caught funding climate denial think tanks. That's not how science is supposed to work.

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

ExxonMobil spent more than $2 million on climate science denial in 2015, records reveal. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - ExxonMobil says it believes in climate change. Its executives probably believe it too, after all, they're smart people. But their profits ... continue reading


WE CAN FEED THE WORLD but choose to throw it away: Shocking truth behind U.S. waste Watch

Image of Food waste in the United States is estimated to be between 30-40 percent (sustainablog).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

The United States faces accusations of wasting enough food to put an end to hunger and increasing methane-producing landfill waste. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) website, the United States' food ... continue reading


Can you hear 'The Hum?' Only 2 percent of people can hear this mysterious sound (AUDIO) Watch

Image of Only 4 percent of the matter in the universe is directly observable.

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Two people out of every hundred can hear it. It's a strange, low grade humming noise coming from the Earth itself. They can't get away from it, they can't make it stop. And nobody knows why it's there. The call it "the hum" and it is one of the planet's most enigmatic ... continue reading


Scientists found a 1,700 mile crack across the USA. Here's what you need to know Watch

Image of Quakes can happen almost anywhere.

By Tony Johnson (California Network)

Is America at risk for Great earthquakes spanning across the full United States?  "Cracks Across America", in Rift zones, may conceal large fracture type faults where scientists may not be able to identify where these hidden fractures may unleash catastrophic ... continue reading


Is The Big One going to strike California TOMORROW? Watch

Image of Is The Big One about to hit California?

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

With the latest data on the San Andreas fault, it feels certain that California is about to experience The Big One. (Like tomorrow!) But is that what the data really shows? LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - The world's most famous fault is the San Andreas. The ... continue reading


Potentially lethal heatwave grips Southwest as temperatures sizzle 25 degrees above summer normal Watch

Image of The extended heatwave is expected to shatter records, and could claim lives as the region withers.

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

A massive heat wave will envelop the American southwest this week, and into the foreseeable future, as California is warned to expect blackouts. The danger from this record breaking heatwave is extreme and people are urged to take precautions. LOS ANGELES, CA ... continue reading


Have hackers disrupted volcano data for Pacific Northwest? Watch

Image of Why did the public lose access to critical public safety data?

By Tony Johnson (California Network)

Unexpectedly, on June 17, 2016, hundreds of seismographs that cover the State of Oregon and Washington, including the PNW volcanoes, became inaccessible[2] with no explanation.  All of these seismograph stations are under the management of the Pacific Northwest ... continue reading


SORRY DUDE! Great white sharks appear in massive numbers off California coast, beaches closed Watch

Image of Look Ma! No cavities!

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Californians love their beaches, and few things can keep them out of the water, especially in the summer. Unfortunately, one of those things is appearing in greater numbers -sharks. And not just any sharks, but great whites. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - The ... continue reading


Is the public being put in dark about Mt. St. Helens and other volcanoes as danger grows? Public now cut off from critical data Watch

Image of Why is information being kept from the public?

By Tony Johnson (California Network)

Just as spectrograph activity of volcanoes Rainier, Baker, Newberry, Three Sisters, and Crater Lake in the Pacific Northwest began to increase on June 13, 2016, the website HTML display code was changed to blank any public viewing of the data.  This raises a ... continue reading


All Green News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Subscribe to Catholic OnlineYouTube Channel

the FEED
by Catholic Online

  • Daily Reading for Tuesday, July 26th, 2016 HD Video
  • Daily Reading for Monday, July 25th, 2016 HD Video
  • 'Contemplative communities are not immune': Pope Francis on prayer
  • St. James the Greater: Saint of the Day for Monday, July 25, 2016
  • Christ apparition in Mexico
  • 'She is the witness to the risen Christ': Mary Magdalene honored
  • Daily Readings for Monday, July 25, 2016

Daily Readings

Reading 1, Second Corinthians 4:7-15
7 But we hold this treasure in pots of earthenware, so that the immensity ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 126:1-2, 2-3, 4-5, 6
1 [Song of Ascents] When Yahweh brought back Zion's captives we lived in ... Read More

Gospel, Matthew 20:20-28
20 Then the mother of Zebedee's sons came with her sons to make a request ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for July 25th, 2016 Image

St. James the Greater
July 25: Nothing is known of St. James the Greater's early ... Read More