Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Marshall Connolly, Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

6/25/2014 (2 years ago)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

I'm still a believer, but the experience was uncomfortable and enlightening.

I had a distressing Monday that I have not yet written about. A report in the Telegraph quoted a blogger who claimed to have evidence that NASA and NOAA falsified climate data to show the planet is warming when in reality it's actually cooling. It gave me an opportunity to think skeptically on the science of global warming.

It would be very upsetting to learn all this is a lie.

It would be very upsetting to learn all this is a lie.

Highlights

By Marshall Connolly, Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

6/25/2014 (2 years ago)

Published in Green

Keywords: NASA, NOAA, climate, data, faked, scandal, beliefs


LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Nobody likes cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance is the cause of the mental stress and anguish you feel when you are presented with evidence that conflicts with one of your core beliefs.

For example, one of my core beliefs is in God, and the Catholic Church. When people attempt to present me with evidence that I am wrong about my belief in God, or the truth of my Church, I don't like it. Fortunately, I am always able to refute their delusions, or their attacks are unsupported with evidence, but it can be a distinctly uncomfortable experience.

Likewise, I also believe in the power of science to describe the laws of nature and the set of circumstances that surround us. My trust -or faith in science is another one of my core beliefs. I believe that the method of doing science, over the long run, reveals the truth, or at least brings us closer to the truth. This doesn't mean scientists are always right, in fact, they're commonly wrong. But over time, they develop a consensus and that consensus should be trusted as long as it is always tested.

Anthropogenic climate change is one of those consensuses, always challenged by one courageous researcher or another, but always withstanding the contrarian.

A key conclusion of science is that the planet is warming due to man-made activity. Now I'm no climatologist and although I've done a lot of reading and several interviews, I have not done my own empirical research, for a myriad of practical reasons. However, I trust the consensus.

But what happens if that consensus, as well-intentioned as I believe it to be, is based on fudged data (lies)?

It's hard to imagine that every scientist on the planet has some evil agenda and is seeking to lie to the world about global warming to secure grant money and funding from world governments, or to engineer a brave new world in accord with their perverse desires. Indeed, this isn't how scientists make their reputation. Scientists don't get points for following the herd, but rather they win Nobels by forging their own path into the unknown and proving that the herd is wrong. But when no scientist can do this, then it suggests to me that the herd is probably right.

Now a question: how many of those scientists rely on NASA and NOAA data for their research? Probably a lot of them. And if someone at the top is fudging the data that so many others use, then they have a lot of power to abuse.

So, last week when a much respected news source like The Telegraph, was aggregated by Drudge, and several links appeared on Drudge, I made a point to read all of them. After reading the Telegraph report that suggested the NASA and NOAA data could be badly flawed, I was pretty upset. Here was evidence which challenged my core belief.

Like any good group-thinker, I immediately searched for additional sources to deny the claim. I found none, at least at first. It seems nobody wanted to confirm my bias so I was left with a pile of evidence in my lap and a spoon to eat it with.

It tasted a lot like crow.

But there was a problem. The conclusion came from only one source, Steven Goddard from "Real Science." In addition to this blog, only The Telegraph ran with the story. Even the sometimes fast-and-loose Daily Mail seemed to shy away from it.

(NOTE: Breitbart also ran the story, quoting The Telegraph.)

The other sources were all rewrites. Even a brazen report from yesterday's "New American" parroted Goddard's claim that the scientists were lying from the start, deliberately falsifying data by changing historical temperature records.

The flag for me was that only one blogger was making this claim and no major news outlet was picking up the story, Telegraph aside.

A day later, my eyebrows were raised by Anthony Watts who told Reason.com he was critical of Goddard's claim. Watts is known for his skeptical blog, "What's Up With That?" WUWT commonly "debunks" global warming claims.

Here was Goddard's claim via Christopher Brooker in The Telegraph:

"Goddard shows how, in recent years, NOAA's [National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's] US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been "adjusting" its record by replacing real temperatures with data "fabricated" by computer models. The effect of this has been to downgrade earlier temperatures and to exaggerate those from recent decades, to give the impression that the Earth has been warming up much more than is justified by the actual data. In several posts headed "Data tampering at USHCN/GISS", Goddard compares the currently published temperature graphs with those based only on temperatures measured at the time. These show that the US has actually been cooling since the Thirties, the hottest decade on record; whereas the latest graph, nearly half of it based on "fabricated" data, shows it to have been warming at a rate equivalent to more than 3 degrees centigrade per century."

Then Watts replied by saying that Goddard "made major errors in his analysis." Needless to say, I was shocked, although I was also secretly pleased to see Watt's response, which improves his integrity in my opinion. I can respect a person with whom I disagree, especially when I see them display intellectual honesty.

Since last week, mainstream sources have responded to Goddard, revealing that indeed, his methods were flawed and his conclusions wrong. Not everybody has got the word yet, but that's just how information propagates. We naturally listen to the information we like (confirmation bias) and we actively seek to dismiss the information that makes us uncomfortable.

My initial reactions to Goddard's claim were denial, then anger. I was angry at the possibility that the scientific establishment could be hoaxing us all based on falsified data. However, this is highly unlikely.

Despite the importance of NASA and NOAA data in current research, there are independent sources for the same data. Every nation has its own meteorologists, climatologists and researchers. They're doing their own science and not all of them are getting grants from leftist governments with an agenda to return humanity to the Stone Age. Furthermore, science is peer reviewed and any scientists that can get a contrary view published scores on the tenure track, so there's incentive to buck the consensus and debunk bad science.

Also, it's very hard to cover up massive conspiracies. One of the best arguments against the U.S. government staging the 9/11 attacks is the government's own inability to keep such a thing quiet. We know the government wasn't actively involved in any way because we would have learned otherwise, likely even before it happened. Now imagine how hard it would be to keep the secret of a global climate change hoax from the world when the keepers of the secret are spread across every nation, every political stripe and every philosophy and motivation.

In fact, scientists are so assured that they're right on this one thing that at least one of them has offered a $10,000 cash prize to anyone who can prove, scientifically, that global warming isn't happening. Well, there you go commenters, there's $10,000 free for the taking if you can prove your point is true.

It is rare that you can get scientists to agree with such consensus on most things. Science is filled with factions and their feuds. However they sometimes agree on basic facts. One of those facts is that AGW is happening and that it is a significant threat to our society as it is structured today. If we accept the word of a lone blogger over that of the scientific community as a whole, then we reveal our own biases for the world to see and we would do well to reconsider our conclusions, despite the discomfort doing so will bring.

---


'Help give every student and teacher Free resources for a world-class moral Catholic education'


Copyright 2017 - Distributed by THE CALIFORNIA NETWORK

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for DECEMBER 2016
Universal:
End to Child-Soldiers: That the scandal of child-soldiers may be eliminated the world over.
Evangelization: Europe: That the peoples of Europe may rediscover the beauty, goodness, and truth of the Gospel which gives joy and hope to life.



Comments


More Green

New priests to learn about global warming as part of formation Watch

Image of Sisters plant trees in a clear-cut forest.

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

In the United States, global climate change is a hot topic. Particularly among Catholics who tend to be politically conservative. American political conservatives don't usually accept the science on global warming. The problem? The Catholic Church does accept the ... continue reading


The Green Pope warned us but no one listened - Now the devastation of nations is upon us Watch

Image of What will happen to the world if the Great Barrier Reef dies?

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

The Green Pope, Pope Benedict XVI, is known for his conservation and call for carbon-neutral states - but too few have listened and the world may suffer deadly consequences. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Pope Benedict XVI warned the world of the dangers that come ... continue reading


A Catholic perspective on Standing Rock Watch

Image of It is important to remember there are Catholics on both sides of the lines.

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

What is happening at Standing Rock, and what is the Catholic Church's viewpoint on the protests? Americans appear to be taking sides on the issue, but where's the guidance for Catholics? Can we be neutral about it? LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) -- "Native ... continue reading


It's dark and cold at the North Pole, so why is it MELTING? Watch

Image of Ice is growing int he Arctic, but at a slower rate than normal. El Nino may be to blame, but the overall trend is worsening.

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Arctic sea ice has set a new record low for November. At a time when the ice should be growing, it appears to have plateaued for a moment, and is growing much less rapidly than normal. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) -- Arctic sea ice has set a new record low for ... continue reading


Months after Trump denies California drought, 102 million trees die from lack of water Watch

Image of Over 100 million trees have died (Lucy Nicholson/Reuters).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

California residents have been caught in a five-year drought, which has deeply impacted the nation's largest production of fruits, vegetables and nuts. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - During a <a ... continue reading


Secrets behind London's mysterious deadly fog revealed - Can it help save China? Watch

Image of Have the mysteries of London fog been revealed?

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

One of the deadliest disasters in British history occurred on December 5th, 1952, when a mysterious veil of fog settled over London. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - No one gave the fog much thought at first.Fog is a regular occurrence in London, after all.[media ... continue reading


Did Catholic Online predict the Supermoon Quake in New Zealand? Watch

Image of The supermoon has been hypothesized to influence quakes, but evidence remains sparse.

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Did Catholic Online predict the supermoon double quake in New Zealand? On Nov. 4, we reported that a major quake was possible on or around Nov. 14. To be fair, we were far from certain, but the eerily accurate prediction may cause some to take notice of the influence ... continue reading


This just has to be the saddest fossil in prehistory Watch

Image of 'Tongtianlong limosus' was stuck in the mud, 66 million years ago. Sadly, the creature was unable to free itself and died a miserable death.

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

It may be the saddest dinosaur fossil ever discovered, a birdlike creature that suffered a slow, agonizing death, stuck in mud. But it may also be one of the greatest fossil finds in recent history, giving scientists a glimpse into evolutionary history and the ... continue reading


Why giant snowballs in Siberia are bad news for Americans Watch

Image of Giant snowballs are piled on a Siberian beach, what does this mean for America?

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Giant snowballs have appeared on the beach in Siberia and they mean bad news for Americans. Do the Russians have a secret weapon in a possible war against the West? LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - A beach in Siberia is covered with massive snowballs and it is ... continue reading


Will the supermoon on Nov. 14 trigger a superquake? Watch

Image of The supermoon will rise on Nov. 14, but will it trigger earthquakes?

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

On the night of Nov. 14, you will have the chance to see an amazing sight. On that day, the Moon will pass closer to Earth than it has in nearly 70 years. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - The closest supermoon of the past 70 years is this November 14. On that ... continue reading


All Green News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Subscribe to Catholic OnlineYouTube Channel

Daily Readings

Reading 1, Sirach 48:1-4, 9-11
1 Then the prophet Elijah arose like a fire, his word flaring like a ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 80:2-3, 15-16, 18-19
2 over Ephraim, Benjamin and Manasseh; rouse your valour and come to our ... Read More

Gospel, Matthew 17:10-13
10 And the disciples put this question to him, 'Why then do the scribes ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for December 10th, 2016 Image

Pope Saint Gregory III
December 10: He was just standing there, not doing anything ... Read More