Worth the Effort: Eliminating Child Labor
Reports Points to Long-term Economic Benefits
GENEVA, FEB. 28, 2004 (Zenit) - A recent International Labor Office report says the benefits of eliminating child labor outweigh the costs involved. The study, "Investing in Every Child, An Economic Study of the Costs and Benefits of Eliminating Child Labor," calculates that around 246 million children are currently involved in labor worldwide. Of these, 179 million are exposed to what the ILO terms the worst forms of work endangering their physical, mental or moral well-being.
Taking these children away from labor and educating them, in a gradual effort through 2020, would cost an estimated $760 billion. This would be far outweighed by the long-term benefits, which ILO reckons at $5.1 trillion.
The report defined child labor as all economically active children below the age of 12, all children ages 12 to 14 working more than 14 hours per week, and all children below age 18 in the worst forms of child labor.
"What's good social policy is also good economic policy," said ILO Director-General Juan Somavia in a Feb. 6 press release accompanying the report's release. "Eliminating child labor will yield an enormous return on investment -- and a priceless impact on the lives of children and families."
The report sets goals of universal primary education by 2015 and universal lower secondary education by 2020. The ILO said additional action would be needed to remove and rehabilitate children in the worst forms of labor, such as bonded labor and prostitution, as well as refugees and those from lower castes.
The report considers a number of factors in totaling the costs of taking children away from labor. Families would be helped by a program of income transfers designed to defray the cost to households of transferring children from work to school. These programs would target all families with school-age children now living in poverty. They would provide benefits according to a formula taking into account the average value of children's work, the number of children per household, and the degree of the household's poverty.
The report did not, however, take into account the value of this income transfer, only allowing for costs associated with the administration of the program. But, even with the income transfer, the study notes additional costs borne by households due to the value of child labor forgone, which researchers put at $246.8 billion.
The study also estimated both the capital and recurrent costs of making education available to a greater number of children, as well as the need to reduce class sizes and improve standards. This accounts for a hefty $493.4 billion out of the total costs of $760 billion.
On the benefits side of the equation the ILO affirmed that the added productive capacity of a future generation of workers due to their increased education would be substantial, accounting for almost all the $5.1 trillion. As well, there would be economic gains anticipated from improved health due to the elimination of the worst forms of child labor.
The study does warn that the figures on costs and benefits are approximate and that there are "very large uncertainties in measurement that surround most aspects of this study. Another qualification to be taken into account is that reaping the economic value of expanded education depends on countries being able to create new jobs that take advantage of higher levels of human capital and can develop appropriate economic policies."
Nevertheless, the report backs up its claims by noting that other institutions, such as the World Bank, agree that increasing education levels of children will have a positive economic effect.
Funding the program will not be easy in the short-term, however. The report admits that until 2016, costs will outweigh benefits, which will not be reaped until the first generation of children completes the extra years of education.
But the report puts this cost into the wider context of public spending. Insofar as the cost to the state is concerned, "[t]he average annual amount during the first decade pales in comparison with the burdens currently borne to finance debt service or the military," argues the ILO.
The ILO calculates that the child labor elimination program would represent "a noticeable but not exorbitant increase in current social expenditures." The study calculates that the average fiscal burden for governments in the first decade represents 11.1% of year 2000 military spending, with costs in the second decade rising to an equivalent of 27.5%. But "this is primarily a political rather than economic question" which can be dealt with in the wider context of discussions over development assistance and debt relief, the report states.
U.S. Labor report ...
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Featured Today
- Monaco & The Vatican: Monaco's Grace Kelly Exhibit to Rome--A Review of Monegasque-Holy See Diplomatic History
- My Dad
- A Royal Betrayal: Catholic Monaco Liberalizes Abortion
- John Paul II as an Apostle of Mercy
- Embrace every moment as sacred time
- A Recession Antidote
- The Why of Jesus' Death: A Pauline Perspective
- Father Lombardi's Address on Catholic Media
- Pope's Words to Pontifical Latin American College
- Prelate: Genetics Needs a Conscience