Why the Difference of Sexes, Part 2
Interview With German Theologian Jutta Burggraf
PAMPLONA, Spain, SEPT. 28, 2004 (Zenit) - Being a woman or being a man is not exhausted by being a mother or father, says German theologian Jutta Burggraf.
A professor of dogmatic theology and ecumenical theology at the University of Navarre, Burggraf offers, in Part 2 of this interview with us, some guidelines to interpret the "Letter to Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Collaboration of Man and Woman in the Church and in the World," published by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
Part 1 of this interview appeared Monday.
Q: Can you explain why to be woman and to be man is not exhausted by being mother or father?
Burggraf: Man and woman are distinguished, obviously, in the possibility of being father or mother. Procreation is ennobled in them by the love in which it develops and, precisely, because of its connection with love, it has been put by God at the center of the human person as a joint task of the two sexes.
However, if we say that the possibility of begetting cannot be the only reason for the difference between the sexes, we must not focus exclusively on the ordinary paternity, although the latter, undoubtedly, demonstrates a special initiative and immense confidence in God.
But to be woman, to be man, is not exhausted by being, respectively, mother or father. Considering the specific qualities of woman, the recent letter speaks opportunely of the "genius of woman." It constitutes a specific basic attitude which corresponds to the physical structure of woman and is fomented by her.
In fact, it does not seem preposterous that the intense relationship that woman has with life can generate in her some particular dispositions. Just as during pregnancy a woman experiences a unique closeness toward a new human being, so also her nature favors the interpersonal meeting with those around her.
The "genius of woman" can be translated in a delicate sensibility given the needs and requirements of others, in the ability to be aware of and to understand possible inner conflicts. She can be identified, cautiously, with a special capacity to show love in a concrete way, to receive the other.
But, obviously, not all women are gentle and unselfish. Not all of them show their talent toward solidarity.
It is not rare that, in specific cases, a man has more sensibility to receive, to take care of, than the majority of women. And he might be more serene than his wife.
In this connection, it is real progress that the recent letter not only reminds us that feminine values are human values, but it distinguishes finely between "woman" and the values that are more proper to her, and "man" and the values more proper to him.
That is, every person must and can develop also the talents of the opposite sex although, generally, it can be a little bit more difficult for him or her.
Q: So there is also masculine genius?
Burggraf: Where there is a "feminine genius" there must be a "masculine genius." What is the specific talent of man? He has by nature a greater distance in respect to concrete life. He is always "outside" the process of gestation and birth, and can only have a part in them through his wife.
Precisely that greater distance can facilitate for him a more serene action to protect life, and ensure its future. It can lead him to be a real father, not only in the physical dimension, but also in the spiritual sense.
It can lead him to be an imperturbable friend, sure and trustworthy. But it can lead him also, in another direction, to a certain disinterest in concrete and daily things, which, unfortunately, has been favored in the past by a unilateral education.
Q: Why is there this opposition between sex and gender?
Burggraf: The letter emphasizes extremist ideologies of gender which deny sexual identity, because the influence of these theories has increased markedly over the past decade.
While the term "sex" refers to nature and implies two possibilities, the term "gender" arises from the field of linguistics where three variations are recognized: masculine, feminine and neuter.
In this case the differences between man and woman do not correspond -- with the exception of the obvious morphological differences -- to a nature "given" by the Creator, but are mere cultural constructions, "made" according to the role and stereotypes that are assigned to the sexes in each society.
According to these premises it is emphasized, and rightfully so, that in the past the differences were excessively accentuated, which led to situations of discrimination toward women.
In fact, for many centuries, it corresponded to woman's destiny to be "modeled" as an inferior being, ...
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Featured Today
- Monaco & The Vatican: Monaco's Grace Kelly Exhibit to Rome--A Review of Monegasque-Holy See Diplomatic History
- My Dad
- A Royal Betrayal: Catholic Monaco Liberalizes Abortion
- John Paul II as an Apostle of Mercy
- Embrace every moment as sacred time
- A Recession Antidote
- The Why of Jesus' Death: A Pauline Perspective
- Father Lombardi's Address on Catholic Media
- Pope's Words to Pontifical Latin American College
- Prelate: Genetics Needs a Conscience