We ask you, humbly: don't scroll away.
Hi readers, it seems you use Catholic Online a lot; that's great! It's a little awkward to ask, but we need your help. If you have already donated, we sincerely thank you. We're not salespeople, but we depend on donations averaging $14.76 and fewer than 1% of readers give. If you donate just $5.00, the price of your coffee, Catholic Online School could keep thriving. Thank you.Help Now >
Supreme Court rules your DNA is like a fingerprint, can be collected upon arrest
FREE Catholic Classes
In a 5 to 4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday that police may obtain DNA samples from people arrested for serious crimes.
Highlights
Catholic Online (https://www.catholic.org)
6/3/2013 (1 decade ago)
Published in Politics & Policy
Keywords: DNA, supreme court, collection, privacy
WASHINGTON DC (Catholic Online) - Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote for the majority, "When officers make an arrest supported by probable cause to hold for a serious offense and they bring the suspect to the station to be detained in custody... Taking and analyzing a cheek swab of the arrestee's D.N.A. is, like fingerprinting and photographing, a legitimate police booking procedure that is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment."
Kennedy was joined by Justices Roberts, Thomas, Breyer, and Alito. Justice Scalia joined Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan in dissent. Scalia said, "Make no mistake about it: because of today's decision, your D.N.A. can be taken and entered into a national database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason."
The case came following the collection of DNA in 2009 from Alonzo Jay king Jr. after his arrest on assault charges in Maryland. After analysis, investigators learned that his DNA profile matched an unsolved 2003 rape case, and he was subsequently convicted for that crime.
His lawyers appealed the conviction saying that a state law authorizing this collection violated the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable search and seizure. The Maryland Court of Appeals agreed with the defense, but the state appealed to the Supreme Court.
Now the Supreme Court has ruled that taking DNA swabs is akin to taking fingerprints and photographs during the booking process and may be done.
Naturally, there are privacy concerns associated with this very intimate form of data collection. In the near future, it is expected that as more DNA is collected from suspects, authorities will begin running these profiles against evidence in cold cases.
This could result in solving many more criminal cases in the future since criminals who remain un-caught and unrehabilitated often reoffend.
---
'Help Give every Student and Teacher FREE resources for a world-class Moral Catholic Education'
Copyright 2021 - Distributed by Catholic Online