Why Einstein cheated on his work
The scientist couldn't believe his original calculations.
A century ago, Einstein cheated on his work. His model of the universe wasn't working because the math didn't seem to add up. Everybody at that time believed the universe to be a fixed, steady thing with stars and galaxies hovering in place, but Einstein's math said it should be expanding. Einstein faced a problem, how to fit a round peg into the square hole of his theory.
Einstein cheated, but at least he was honest about it.
As with all cheaters, conscience is a nag and Einstein remained troubled by what he would later call his "greatest blunder." The good scientist corrected himself as soon as contradictory evidence came available. Luckily, he didn't have to work very hard.
Georges Lemaitre, a Catholic priest and professor, studied Einstein's work, then predicted the universe could be expanding and suggested with great accuracy just how fast that might be happening.
Subsequent observations by the preeminent astronomer, Edwin Hubble, proved Lemaitre correct.
Hubble's method was to observe the light coming from distant objects. Light, like any other energy travelling through the universe, moves in waves. As an object moves closer, the light becomes more intense, or specifically, blue. As it moves away, the light becomes less intense, and red.
You may experience a similar effect, known popularly as Doppler shift, when you listen to the sound of an oncoming vehicle. As it gets closer, the sound gets much louder, but the instant it passes you, the sound rapidly fades.
When Hubble observed a "red shift" in the light of distant objects, it became obvious that the universe was expanding. That meant Einstein's original calculations that predicted an expanding universe were right.
In the decades that followed, scientists have asked why the universe is expanding, but until recently they haven't had the technology to properly study the question. Fortunately, new technology and methods have made advanced observations possible and scientists now know, with over 99 percent certainty, that the universe is expanding because of a mysterious force known as "dark energy."
Scientists call it dark energy because they cannot (yet) directly observe it. So far, only its effects have been measured. Nobody can say precisely what it is, but it is very evident what it does. And what it does will also surprise you. Scientists now know that the universe is not only expanding, but that the rate of expansion is accelerating.
Scientists now also know that empty space isn't empty space. New observations demonstrate that particles in space literally pop into existence from nothing (that we can yet observe) and also disappear. There's no agreed explanation yet for this phenomenon, but some think this phenomenon could be strongly related to dark energy.
Ultimately, scientists now know with great certainty that dark energy is real and that Einstein was correct the first time around; despite the pressure to be right, he didn't have to cheat. Although scientists will continue to test his theories, few actually expect to see contradictory answers. The good news is that these new understandings bring us closer to understanding how the universe works, and thus helps us to appreciate the marvel of all creation.
© 2012, Distributed by NEWS CONSORTIUM.
- - -
Pope Benedict XVI's Prayer Intentions for January 2013
General Intention: The Faith of Christians. That in this Year of Faith Christians may deepen their knowledge of the mystery of Christ and witness joyfully to the gift of faith in him.
Missionary Intention: Middle Eastern Christians. That the Christian communities of the Middle East, often discriminated against, may receive from the Holy Spirit the strength of fidelity and perseverance.
Keywords: Einstein, cosmological constant, dark energy, cheated, universe, Hubble
NEWSLETTERS »
Rate This Article
1 - 3 of 3 Comments
Leave a Comment
More Technology News
- Navy dolphin discovers ancient naval torpedo
- Maybe climate change isn't so bad after all? Study shows prehistoric humans benefitted technologically from climate change
- California teenager invents device that can charge cell phone in 20 seconds - flat
- MULTIVERSE DISCOVERY - First solid proof of other universes besides ours
- Comet ISON may spark unprecedented meteor shower
- 'May God's love be with you' - First music video made in space!
- Online retail giant Amazon begins virtual coin collection
- Windows 8 goes sour as company announces U-turn
- Solar cataclysm! Sun threatens Earth with possible geomagnetic storm
Featured News
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?
Most Popular
There's the problem! Americans are out of touch with scientific consensus on climate change Read More
Editorial: Is the Scandal Ridden Obama Administration Becoming a House of Cards? Read More
Sex In Uniform: Why the Increase in Sexual Assaults in the Military? Read More
Bill Donohue, Catholic League, Disclose Fight with the IRS, Demonstrate Courage Read More
Culture of Corruption: Why Obama's misuse of Marines is wrong Read More
Daily Readings
Reading 1, Sirach 5:1-8
Do not put your confidence in your money or say, 'With this I ... Read More
Psalm, Psalms 1:1-2, 3-4, 6
How blessed is anyone who rejects the advice of the wicked and ... Read More
Gospel, Mark 9:41-50
'If anyone gives you a cup of water to drink because you belong ... Read More
Saint of the Day
St. John Baptist Rossi
May 23: This holy priest was born in 1698 at the village of Voltaggio in ... Read More
Latest Videos
BREAKING: British Soldier Beheaded On UK Street 2013 View Video
Mass singing in St. Peter, Vatican View Video
Miss Crosswhite, the Oklahoma teacher that dared to pray View Video
Marketplace
Intercession: Moving Mountains by Living Eucharistically Read More
Catholic Memorial / Funeral Cards
Custom Printed Full Color Memorial / Funeral Cards. SAME DAY RUSH ... Read More




Print















"Cheated" is a bit harsh. His field equations (which predicted the expanding universe) were of the form which allowed adding an extra term if necessary. He noticed that adding this term "halted" the expansion without otherwise upsetting the equations. This was no cheating, just making his model agree with what was then considered "obvious".
Yes, the question of "nothing" is an interesting one :-) What's interesting is how startlingly correct some of the old mystics were. For example, most self-respecting Christian mystics talk about "the void". Jakob Boehme describes it as something infinitely dense and without dimension and extent. That's a pretty good description of a black hole singularity. Giordano Bruno spoke of other planets inhabited by human-like beings long before scientists dreamed about this problem.
From both "mystic" and "scientific" point of view it's becoming more and more clear that the world of matter (elementary particles and the various fields) are a sort of "surface" of a very large "sea". Most likely we'll never be able to probe under this "surface" much because everything we can interact with (our tools, particle accelerators, etc.) ultimately can only bear witness to whatever particles they (the tools) can interact with. And we already know of particles with which we can just _barely_ interact (the neutrino) and it's practically certain there are tons of other particles which don't interact with "our" known particles at all. "Dark matter" is probably something like this except it still leaves a trace of influence on us by interacting _gravitationally only_. But there are quite likely other types of "matter" which don't interact with us at all.
Summing up: it would indeed be a truly _astonishing_ coincidence in physics, if the entire _being_ consisted of just that what we called "the physical universe". Much more can be told about this but unfortunately, the margin is too small to contain it :-)
There is a very readable book out for the layman right now (I don't think it's in paperback yet) called, "A Universe From Nothing." Basically, the word nothing has been updated by physicists. Philosophers and theologians mean one thing by nothing, but science now has reasons to say nothing isn't nothing anymore.
Robert Sungenis would have a field-day with this article.