Government to snoop into more emails, web history
Obama issued executive order to expand information net.
Amid growing fears of a crippling cyber-attack, government officials have ordered the expansion of a security program that automatically scans internet traffic and will now net more private and personal communications.
The order has already been given, issued as an executive order by the Obama administration.
Classified information will be submitted that will direct what will be searched and how. Special emphasis will be placed on what security agencies such as the National Security Agency, and the Central Intelligence Agency, believe are the most relevant threats.
Data will be gathered by the Department of Homeland Security and sent to private third parties who will process the data and provide aggregate information to the government.
Of particular interest will be communications involving contractors and other firms that are providing services to the government, especially on classified projects.
Workers for these firms can expect to have their email and browsing data collected and reviewed by third parties.
Defense contractors and government networks are already subject to such scrutiny, now the net will include, among others, those who work at big banks, utilities, and transportation companies.
Although officials remain deliberately vague on just what will happen and how, they have been clear on the threat that a cyber attack poses.
For example, a cyber attack could cripple or destroy critical infrastructure such as electrical production, without which nothing else could operate. Even your toilet could stop flushing if pumps that operate wells were shut down because of a cyber attack.
While a toilet that won't flush is scary in its own right, there are boarder implications that many Americans could find much more frightening, such as an expansion of the government's ability to snoop and read through your emails and private data.
In itself, should hackers or cyber-terrorists obtain this data, they could also compromise national security through the very entities entrusted to defend it. Of course, the most alarming scenario involves the government using the data for some unforeseen end other than what is presently stated.
There are clear implications to civil liberties. Unfortunately, the price we may be asked to pay to keep the lights on could be our privacy, and in turn our freedom. At some point, it simply isn't worth it.
© 2014 - Distributed by THE NEWS CONSORTIUM
Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for March 2014
Respect for Women: That all cultures may respect the rights and dignity of women.
Vocations: That many young people may accept the Lordís invitation to consecrate their lives to proclaiming the Gospel.
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Politics & Policy News
- Russia seeks access to new facilities for navy: Is a new Cold War ahead?
- Bill that would allow surprise inspections at abortion clinics close to approval in Arizona
- UN: Almost 10,000 incidents of school violence from 2009-2013
- Syria, Venezuela, North Korea and Uganda called out by U.S. State Department for human rights abuses
- Citing 'negative consequences,' Arizona Governor vetoes anti-gay bill
- 'Shared responsibility payment' in Obamacare tax hides veiled threat
- California Senator faces 400 years in prison on corruption charges
- Leaked document shows NSA spied on trade talks, U.S. lawyers
- First medical doctor in Texas suspended under new abortion law
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?