Supreme Court deciding if you need to prove citizenship to vote
Arizona case before the court today.
A law intended to prevent voter fraud in a state where illegal immigrants make a substantial portion of the population goes before the Supreme Court today as activists claim the law is intended to intimidate and discourage naturalized citizens from voting.
Federal law already requires voters to demonstrate or declare citizenship when voting, however Arizona's law goes further and requires such proof at the time of registration. It is possible that someone can register to vote by mail, and then by absentee ballot and avoid any test of citizenship beyond signing a declaration on their forms and ballots. Although the oath on those forms is signed under the penalty of perjury, such cases are rarely prosecuted since voter fraud appears to be rare in the U.S.
However, it is uncertain just how rare voter fraud is because authorities have rarely investigated it as a phenomenon in the U.S.
While across the country, voters can sign up and vote without ever showing up in person, anywhere, Arizona's Proposition 200 changes that and requires a registering voter to show up in person and provide proof of citizenship. This, opponents argue, is intimidating to naturalized citizens.
Is it really, and why should it be?
These are questions that the Supreme Court may consider when evaluating the case.
Another important argument has to do with the Constitutional right of states to determine how they manage elections. The Constitution allows states to set their own rules and guidelines for elections, however Congress passed a law, a decade ago, requiring all states to treat an application for a driver's license as a registration to vote.
Ultimately, the Arizona law requires naturalized citizens to show up in person to register, which opponents of the law say is an unjust burden.
Supporters of the law say it is necessary to ensure that all the votes they count are legal votes. Since Arizona has a substantial population of illegal immigrants, it is possible for them to sway the outcome of an election by voting en masse, illegally.
Other states with similar laws, including Alabama, Georgia, and Kansas have joined Arizona in promoting the law.
The final ruling will come before July.
© 2013, Distributed by NEWS CONSORTIUM.
Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for December 2013
General Intention: Victimized Children. That children who are victims of abandonment or violence may find the love and protection they need.
Missionary Intention: Prepare the Savior's Coming. That Christians, enlightened by the Word incarnate, may prepare humanity for the Savior's coming.
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Politics & Policy News
- Fiercely democratic Oregon only signs up 44 people for Obamacare
- Colin Powell, Republican, comes out in favor of single-payer healthcare system
- Francis, Human Dignity and Culture: Time for a Radical Christian Action Movement
- Obamacare is a success! But not the kind you'll want to celebrate
- New 'Obamacare' health plans may exclude major hospitals
- Marriage Liberation Movement: Global Defense of Marriage in France, China and Around the World
- Principles are expensive: Republican governors missing out on billions in Medicaid funds
- Rush Limbaugh is Wrong, Karen Finney of MSNBC is Nuts: Pope Francis and Capitalism
- NSA REVELATIONS: Ways that would have been previously unimaginable
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?