Should we cut spending or raise taxes? Yes.
Solution to crisis is much more complicated than both sides say.
The federal government is set to take in a record amount of cash this year, 2.7 trillion in revenues. It seems the Democrats have the extra revenues they want. Yet, they say they need more to make the budget work. Republicans say spending is the problem and are calling for cuts. So who's right, Republicans or Democrats? The answer is yes.
Should we cut, or raise taxes? The answer may be yes.
Democrats say they need new revenues, a.k.a. taxes, to ensure there's enough money in the budget. They're right. Despite the record amount of revenue projected by the IRS, around $2.7 trillion, it's still not enough.
There are three basic reasons why the Democrats are right. First, the $2.7 trillion is just a prediction, and does not accurately reflect what the government will actually collect. Not all of the money gets paid. Second, inflation has reduced the purchasing power of the money, which means that while $2.7 trillion is a lot, it does not buy what it used to in 2007, when the government collected $2.6 trillion. Essentially, the government still has less purchasing power than in 2007.
Finally, programs such as Socials Security and Medicare, as well as massive expenditures by the government in other areas, continues to grow. Health care costs are out of control to the point that health care executives simply appear greedy, while the government continues to spend billions on pet projects and entitlements.
Meanwhile, Republicans want to see cuts in spending. Using the simple analogy of a household budget, Republicans say the government is maxing out its credit to support a lifestyle that is well beyond its means.
Cuts sound like an easy solution, however the programs targeted for cuts are dear to many people. Few want to see cuts to health care, and in fact they want to see more spending, not less. This is feeding a cycle of upward spiraling health care costs. With Obamacare ready to take full effect in just 10 months, it is likely that higher costs will be passed on to consumers via higher premiums and higher taxes.
Of course, the quality of care will not increase. It is a sad fact that the United States pays more for its healthcare than any other industrialized nation in the world, yet remains well behind even socialized countries in quality of care. Only for a select few, with premium plans, does care remain better.
So what needs to happen?
The only way the budget will be sustainable in future years will be to cut programs that the middle-class finds popular. That means Socials Security and Medicare, among others. Likely means testing will have to be introduced and at some point the spiraling costs will need to be addressed.
Insurance companies, which are growing ever fatter on the largesse of government money and approaching employer mandates, not to mention public necessity, are the only winners in a crisis that is approaching scandal.
Welfare spending is an issue as well, as it has been revealed that large segments of the population are now chronically unemployed or under-employed. The purchasing power of minimum wage has eroded so far that those earning the lowest wages require government assistance to support families.
Of course, the largest quantity of welfare is paid out to private contractors
Yet, cuts to these programs are unpopular. Politicians who support them will soon see themselves ushered out the door, especially those who hail from blue districts. Naturally, this goes against every fiber of being for a political creature, whose chief interest is clinging to power. It is a side-effect of a broken political system which rewards clever manipulation and doublespeak rather than wise governance.
Of course, one way to close the gap quickly is to blend spending cuts with new taxes. These would not the supposedly "new" taxes that came about as a result of the expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts, but rather genuinely new taxes. Nor does this include the massive new, backbreaking tax that is Obamacare.
In addition to these new revenues, the government should look closely at those agencies which provide services at growing costs to the people. While price controls are always a bad idea, there may need to be carefully considered reforms in healthcare and other industries that promote affordable services, such as healthcare. For example, healthcare itself (not research) should be a non-profit exercise. Instead, the entire apparatus is shifting into overdrive as insurers and providers cash in.
Fundamental to this is a reform in the political system itself. Bought-and-paid-for politicians will not solve the problems they were paid to create. For that, it falls to us, the citizens, to replace them with ethical actors who will govern wisely, rather than profitably.
Of course, given the average level of political interest in learning how to understand doublespeak and stay informed on the byzantine politics of the time, that's even more unlikely than the coming crash.
© 2013, Distributed by NEWS CONSORTIUM.
- - -
Pope Benedict XVI's Prayer Intentions for January 2013
General Intention: The Faith of Christians. That in this Year of Faith Christians may deepen their knowledge of the mystery of Christ and witness joyfully to the gift of faith in him.
Missionary Intention: Middle Eastern Christians. That the Christian communities of the Middle East, often discriminated against, may receive from the Holy Spirit the strength of fidelity and perseverance.
Keywords: Republicans, Democrats, PR, economy, fiscal cliff, sequester, revenues, budget, cuts
NEWSLETTERS »
Rate This Article
1 - 3 of 3 Comments
Leave a Comment
More Politics & Policy News
- Special Report from the Virginia Republican Nominating Convention: A Time To Choose - Life
- Lois Learner pleads the 5th. Was she the crook behind it or was she following orders from higher up?
- Carney still insists nobody told Obama about IRS investigation
- State Department insider warns more whistle-blowers to come on Benghazi scandal
- Hillary better be prepared, House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa says
- E.W. Jackson Wins Nomination as Republican Candidate for Lieutenant Governor of Virginia
- 'Planned Parenthood has been far more lethal to black lives than the KKK ever was!' Virginia GOP nominee says
- Food stamps hang in the balance as lawmakers debate cost
- News to ruin your morning: IRS official who targeted conservatives for audit now oversees your Obamacare compliance
Featured News
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?
Most Popular
There's the problem! Americans are out of touch with scientific consensus on climate change Read More
Editorial: Is the Scandal Ridden Obama Administration Becoming a House of Cards? Read More
Sex In Uniform: Why the Increase in Sexual Assaults in the Military? Read More
Bill Donohue, Catholic League, Disclose Fight with the IRS, Demonstrate Courage Read More
Culture of Corruption: Why Obama's misuse of Marines is wrong Read More
Daily Readings
Reading 1, Sirach 4:11-19
Wisdom brings up her own children and cares for those who seek ... Read More
Psalm, Psalms 119:165, 168, 171, 172, 174, 175
Great peace for those who love your Law; no stumbling-blocks ... Read More
Gospel, Mark 9:38-40
John said to him, 'Master, we saw someone who is not one of us ... Read More
Saint of the Day
St. Rita
May 22: St. Rita was born at Spoleto, Italy in 1381. At an early age, ... Read More
Latest Videos
Miss Crosswhite, the Oklahoma teacher that dared to pray View Video
May 22 - Homily: Pray and Sacrifice for Sinners View Video
May 22 - Homily: St. Rita, Mother and Nun View Video
Superior General of Jesuits, is now the new president of the Union of Superiors General View Video
Marketplace
The Power of the Rosary
The Power of the Rosary is a collection of miraculous personal ... Read More
St. Joseph & St. Jude Home Sale Kit
Added at the request of many of our customers, this home sale kit ... Read More




Print















The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.
Hmmm. Secularism also meant the voluntary relinquishment of organized religion in many socialist countries.
Jesus said, "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's but, Give to God what belongs to God."
He never said, to give to God what is God's and Caesar you need to go get more and more and more. Saul Alinksy got the Bishops to buy into his social justice plans to help the poor and the next thing you know the government has its hands involved in the charities of the Church. The Bishops want the money from the government and now can't raise their voice against government intrusion for fear of losing the funding. They fear losing funding as this administration forces us to support abortion, takes away religious freedom, spends our grandchildren's future, rewrites right and wrong, forces us to accept gay marriage and sodomy, steals more and more from the private citizen and tells us all it is the Christian thing to do!
Stop the Madness!
"They're right. Despite the record amount of revenue projected by the IRS, around $2.7 trillion, it's still not enough. "
This is nonsensical socialist propaganda. $2.7 trillion is more than enough to pay for all of the legitimate, i.e. constitutional, functions that the federal government needs to perform, with much left over to spare.
The author of this propaganda then states some "reasons" why $2.7 trillion is "not enough". One of these is "...inflation has reduced the purchasing power of the money." I learned in Econ 101 that the root cause of inflation is government deficit spending funded by the printing of more money, thereby diluting the value of the currency. Thus, this "reason" the government needs more money is because the government is creating this "reason" it needs more money.
Another "reason" given is "...massive expenditures by the government in other areas, continues to grow." So, again, the government needs more money because it wants to keep increasing its need for more money.
The truth is that the only reason that the government "needs" more money is because it wants to "need" more money, and it is content to risk the total financial collapse of the country, if not the entire world, to try to get what it "needs".
Stating that "the government needs more money" is just a euphemism for stating that the government wants to steal more individual freedom and exert ever more tyrannical control over individual lives.
Trying to get the revenue right always misses the needed conversation of what should we be spending our money on. I fully support raising the taxes needed to pay for the government we all agree is needed. The problem is that no one agrees. So whoever wins controls the purse strings.
Not to draw cries of socialism, but at some point we really need to look at the for-profit model of healthcare delivery in this country. I think if we merely follow the money, we will learn very clearly what is really happening with healthcare in our country. Because it's surely not working for everyone, let alone making the vast majority of people healthier.