Hudson and Fournier: Catholic Countdown to Election 2012, Day 38: Ryan, Biden and Selective Press Coverage
I am proud of his accomplishments as a native son, and a brother in the faith, and my prayers go with him and especially with his family as they endure the unbelievable demands of a presidential campaign here in the United States
When a politician's own ordinary is willing to make such a statement in support of a seated political representation from his own diocese that, in effect, more than offsets the criticism coming from any other bishop.
WASHINGTON,DC (Catholic Online) - From the moment Congressman Paul Ryan was announced as Mitt Romney's running mate, the Obama Catholic supporters have been flogging him for a letter sent by two individual bishops to members of Congress critical of his 2012 GOP budget. From the coverage, you would think that Ryan, a Catholic from Wisconsin, had been universally condemned by the bishops' conference.
Not only is that wrong - and a complete misrepresentation - the Ryan story was told without any mention of the problems his counterpart, Vice President Joe Biden, also a Catholic, has had with bishops over many years.
To provide one example stemming from the 2008 presidential campaign, Biden made some inaccurate comments on Meet the Press about Catholic doctrine on the beginning of life.
Cardinal Justin F. Rigali, chairman of the USCCB's Committee on Pro-Life Activities, and Bishop William E. Lori, chairman of the USCCB's Committee on Doctrine, issued a joint statement "to correct the misrepresentations" of Church teachings advanced by Biden. Indeed, they argued that "the senator's claim that the beginning of human life is a 'personal and private' matter of religious faith, one that cannot be 'imposed' on others, does not reflect the truth of the matter."
Archbishop Chaput, who was still in Denver at the time, considered it such a serious matter he stated, "I certainly presume his good will and integrity and I presume that his integrity will lead him to refrain from presenting himself for Communion."
It should be added that while Ryan was, in fact, criticized by two bishops, he also received a public letter from the president of the USCCB, Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York, praising him for his application of the Church's social teaching to the budgetary process. In fact,
Perhaps even more importantly, Ryan's own bishop, Bishop Robert Morlino of Madison, WS, published a column clearly intended to offset the growing chorus of criticism. Bishop Morlino could hardly have stated his support for Ryan more plainly, without, of course, endorsing him:
"It was no shock at all for me to learn that our diocesan native son, Paul Ryan, had been chosen to be a candidate for the Vice Presidency of the United States. I am proud of his accomplishments as a native son, and a brother in the faith, and my prayers go with him and especially with his family as they endure the unbelievable demands of a presidential campaign here in the United States. It is not for the bishop or priests to endorse particular candidates or political parties. Any efforts on the part of any bishop or priest to do so should be set aside. And you can be assured that no priest who promotes a partisan agenda is acting in union with me or with the Universal Church".
When a politician's own ordinary is willing to make such a statement in support of a seated political representation from his own diocese that, in effect, more than offsets the criticism coming from any other bishop. Case closed!
Speaking of our friend Bill Donohue, he has a huge fight brewing in his home city of New York which may quickly morph into a political hot potato for the Democratic party elites of that city. Donohue is well known for taking on needless, reckless, and deliberate attacks on the Church and the Catholic faith -- this time it's another "exhibition" by Andres Serrano, called "Piss Christ". (Friends, we have come a long, long way from the days when artists, even those who did not believe, used as their subjects the great characters and narrative of Sacred Scriptures and the stories of the saints.)
Donohue, believe it or not, was not allowed to enter the exhibit at the Edward Tyler Nahem gallery on W. 57th St. -- in direct violation of his First Amendment rights. Here is what happened in Donohue's words:
"When I entered the lobby, I was stopped by a man who works for the building. He asked for ID and requested that I sign in. I said okay, and then asked if I could go to the gallery. He said the gallery and the building are two different entities, and that I had to ask the men from the gallery; they were ...
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Politics & Policy News
- Attorney General approved warrant for Fox reporter's emails
- 'Journalism has been criminalized' Juan Williams declares
- Documents reveal US drone policy is scandalously indiscriminate
- Special Report from the Virginia Republican Nominating Convention: A Time To Choose - Life
- Lois Learner pleads the 5th. Was she the crook behind it or was she following orders from higher up?
- Sick of deception! Democrat threatens IRS with appointment of special prosecutor
- FOURTH OBAMA SCANDAL: Did HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius solicit funds for nonprofit group?
- Carney still insists nobody told Obama about IRS investigation
- State Department insider warns more whistle-blowers to come on Benghazi scandal
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?