It's not easy being Antonin Scalia, Supreme Court Justice
Scalia responds to a critical review of his new book.
US Supreme Court justice, Antonin Scalia is sparring with a lower-court judge over comments made about a book Scalia co-authored. Judge Richard Posner of the 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals says Scalia lied in his book about how he interprets law in his review published in The New Republic.
Justice Antonin Scalia.
In other words, laws do not change with time, even if the zeitgeist is different. This is an ultra-conservative viewpoint, although not all decisions reflect a modern conservative philosophy.
Posner argued that Scalia deviated from this philosophy when he struck down a 2008 Washington D.C. handgun ban. Posner also accused Scalia and his co-author, legal scholar Bryan Garner, of doing "sloppy research."
Scalia fired back, saying that Posner could only get away with such arguments because he was writing for a lay audience, and a legal one.
"You can get away with it in The New Republic, I suppose, but not to a legal audience," Scalia said.
Scalia defended his position. He gave an example of the death penalty and how a textual originalism approach would conclude that it is not cruel and unusual. He explained that at the time the cruel and unusual clause was added to the Constitution, capital punishment was standard, therefore it could never be cruel and unusual in itself, because the people at the time the clause was written apparently had no issue with the death penalty.
Scalia says his approach is principled and argued that it is not always an inherently conservative thing. "I should be the pinup of the criminal defense bar," he said. Scalia was referring to this record of guaranteeing the rights of the accused to a trial by jury and to confront witnesses against them.
Scalia also explained that most of the courts time is not spent arguing over the attention-grabbing issues often reported in the headlines, but often over mundane points of law and the fine details of things like the Internal Revenue Code.
In other words, it's not easy being Antonin Scalia so, critics should take that into consideration before scribbling.
© 2012, Distributed by NEWS CONSORTIUM.
- - -
Pope Benedict XVI's Prayer Intentions for January 2013
General Intention: The Faith of Christians. That in this Year of Faith Christians may deepen their knowledge of the mystery of Christ and witness joyfully to the gift of faith in him.
Missionary Intention: Middle Eastern Christians. That the Christian communities of the Middle East, often discriminated against, may receive from the Holy Spirit the strength of fidelity and perseverance.
Keywords: Antonin Scalia, Supreme Court, textual originalism
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Politics & Policy News
- 'Journalism has been criminalized' Juan Williams declares
- Documents reveal US drone policy is scandalously indiscriminate
- Special Report from the Virginia Republican Nominating Convention: A Time To Choose - Life
- Lois Learner pleads the 5th. Was she the crook behind it or was she following orders from higher up?
- Sick of deception! Democrat threatens IRS with appointment of special prosecutor
- FOURTH OBAMA SCANDAL: Did HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius solicit funds for nonprofit group?
- Carney still insists nobody told Obama about IRS investigation
- State Department insider warns more whistle-blowers to come on Benghazi scandal
- Hillary better be prepared, House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa says
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?