Pfeiffer apologizes to Charles Krauthammer of the Washington Post over removal of Churchill bust

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)
8/2/2012
Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

'I take your criticism seriously and you are correct that you are owed an apology,' Pfeiffer writes

Washington Post columnist and Fox News contributor Charles Krauthammer wrote an opinion piece denouncing the Obama administration for removing a bust of Sir Winston Churchill from the Oval Office when it came to power. White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer issued a stinging rebuke saying the allegations were "100 percent false." Proven wrong, Pfeiffer offered a formal apology on the White House blog.

Dan Pfeiffer's apology is seen as a welcome sign, but many others say they are not mollified by the gesture.

Facebook Delicous MySpace

Twitter Stumble Digg

More Destinations

LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - "I take your criticism seriously and you are correct that you are owed an apology," Pfeiffer's message reads.

"There was clearly an internal confusion about the two busts and there was no intention to deceive. I clearly overshot the runway in my post. The point I was trying to make - under the belief that the Bust in the residence was the one previously in the Oval Office - was that this oft repeated talking point about the bust being a symbol of President Obama's failure to appreciate the special relationship is false.

"The bust that was returned was returned as a matter of course with all the other artwork that had been loaned to President Bush for display in his Oval Office and not something that President Obama or his Administration chose to do. I still think this is an important point and one I wish I had communicated better," Pfeiffer writes.

"A better understanding of the facts on my part and a couple of deep breaths at the outset would have prevented this situation. Having said all that, barring a miracle comeback from the Phillies I would like to see the Nats win a world series even if it comes after my apology," Pfeiffer then ends with his signature.

Pfeiffer's apology is seen as a welcome sign, but many others say they are not mollified by the gesture. Some say that the apology will not end the controversy over the decision by the White House to return the Churchill bust. Pfeiffer's words still have a defiant tone about them, and he categorically claims that the bust was sent back "as a matter of course." The bust's return to the British government was "not something that President Obama or his Administration chose to do."

The British newspapers The Sunday Telegraph and The Times of London ran major articles back in early 2009 revealing that British officials had made it clear to the White House that President Obama could keep the Churchill bust in the Oval Office. Some pundits feel the gesture is a deliberate snub of America's closest friend and ally, and it would be good for the White House to acknowledge the truth, rather than continue to spin a blatantly false and misleading line.

� 2012, Catholic Online. Distributed by NEWS CONSORTIUM.

- - -

Pope Benedict XVI's Prayer Intentions for January 2013
General Intention: The Faith of Christians. That in this Year of Faith Christians may deepen their knowledge of the mystery of Christ and witness joyfully to the gift of faith in him.
Missionary Intention: Middle Eastern Christians. That the Christian communities of the Middle East, often discriminated against, may receive from the Holy Spirit the strength of fidelity and perseverance.

Keywords: Dan Pfeiffer, Churchill bust, snub, Charles Krauthammer

NEWSLETTERS »

Rate This Article

Was this helpful to you? Very Helpful Somewhat Helpful Not Helpful at All

Would you be interested in more articles like this? Yes, I am Interested No, I am not Interested

Rate Article

1 - 1 of 1 Comments

abey
9 months ago
If so much can be told about a bust removal, that what needs to be told of Obama & his gangs, trying to erase the country's name & faith in God, to its very survival itself.

Comments submitted must be civil, remain on-topic and not violate any laws including copyright. We reserve the right to delete any comments which are abusive, inappropriate or not constructive to the discussion.

Though we invite robust discussion, we reserve the right to not publish any comment which denigrates the human person, undermines marriage and the family, or advocates for positions which openly oppose the teaching of the Catholic Church.

This is a supervised forum and the Editors of Catholic Online retain the right to direct it.

We also reserve the right to block any commenter for repeated violations. Your email address is required to post, but it will not be published on the site.

We ask that you NOT post your comment more than once. Catholic Online is growing and our ability to review all comments sometimes results in a delay in their publication.

Name *

Email *

Comment *

Send me important information from Catholic Online and it's partners. See Sample

Post Comment