Supreme Court allows corporate, labor union interests to spend freely in campaigns

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)
6/25/2012
Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

Justices strike down state of Montana law limiting corporate campaign spending

By a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court's conservative justices have reaffirmed its 2-year-old decision allowing corporations to spend freely to influence elections. The decision as rendered in the Citizens United case in 2010 applies to state campaign finance laws and guarantees corporate and labor union interests the right to spend whatever they decide to advocate for, or against candidates for state and local offices. The decision strikes down a state of Montana law limiting corporate campaign spending.

Both Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer had already challenged Kennedy's view that the independent campaign spending could not be corrupting by virtue of the absence of links to a campaign.

Facebook Delicous MySpace

Twitter Stumble Digg

More Destinations

LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - The same five justices said in 2010 that corporations have a constitutional right to be heard in election campaigns. The previous decision set into motion unlimited spending by corporations and labor unions in elections for Congress and the president, on provision that the dollars are independent of the campaigns they are intended to help.

Montana has aggressively defended its 1912 law against a challenge from corporations seeking to be free of spending limits. The state Supreme Court sided with the state. A history of corruption showed the need for the limits the court decided; even as Justice Anthony Kennedy declared in his Citizens United opinion that independent expenditures by corporations "do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption."

Twenty-two states and the U.S. capital area, as well as Sen. John McCain and other congressional champions of stricter regulations on campaign money, joined with Montana.

Both Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer had already challenged Kennedy's view that the independent campaign spending could not be corrupting by virtue of the absence of links to a campaign.

Ginsburg in a brief statement for herself and Breyer said that campaign spending since the decision makes "it exceedingly difficult to maintain that independent expenditures by corporations 'do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption.'"

Ginsburg appeared to be referring to the rise of unregulated super political action committees that have injected millions of dollars into the presidential and other campaigns, saying the case "will give the court an opportunity to consider whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates' allegiance, Citizens United should continue to hold sway."

The corporations that sued over the law said it could not remain on the books after the Citizens United decision.

The State of Montana urged the high court to reject the appeal, or hold arguments and not issue what the court calls a summary reversal. Montana and its supporters had previously thought that a thorough debate over the Citizens United decision would lead to its reconsideration or at least limits on its reach.

� 2012, Catholic Online. Distributed by NEWS CONSORTIUM.

- - -

Pope Benedict XVI's Prayer Intentions for January 2013
General Intention: The Faith of Christians. That in this Year of Faith Christians may deepen their knowledge of the mystery of Christ and witness joyfully to the gift of faith in him.
Missionary Intention: Middle Eastern Christians. That the Christian communities of the Middle East, often discriminated against, may receive from the Holy Spirit the strength of fidelity and perseverance.

Keywords: Montana, corporations, campaign spending, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer

NEWSLETTERS »

Rate This Article

Was this helpful to you? Very Helpful Somewhat Helpful Not Helpful at All

Would you be interested in more articles like this? Yes, I am Interested No, I am not Interested

Rate Article

0 Comments

Comments submitted must be civil, remain on-topic and not violate any laws including copyright. We reserve the right to delete any comments which are abusive, inappropriate or not constructive to the discussion.

Though we invite robust discussion, we reserve the right to not publish any comment which denigrates the human person, undermines marriage and the family, or advocates for positions which openly oppose the teaching of the Catholic Church.

This is a supervised forum and the Editors of Catholic Online retain the right to direct it.

We also reserve the right to block any commenter for repeated violations. Your email address is required to post, but it will not be published on the site.

We ask that you NOT post your comment more than once. Catholic Online is growing and our ability to review all comments sometimes results in a delay in their publication.

Name *

Email *

Comment *

Send me important information from Catholic Online and it's partners. See Sample

Post Comment