Catholic Social Doctrine: Politics is Grounded in Personhood, Affirms the Natural Law
A Catholic vision of political participation begins with the human person
We must not forget the truth about man
First, a personalist political philosophy rejects any materialistic--that is, non-spiritual, non-Transcendental--vision of the world. Second, it rejects any political theory that does not acknowledge the human as a person, with a particular nature (a nature which he does not make for himself, but one which is "given" him), with a particular final end, and with an ultimate destiny (not one which he fashions himself, but again one which is "given").
(As an aside, the natural law is "given," it is therefore a grace. That is why it has been called the "first grace," the gratia prima, of God. It does us good to recognize that the natural moral law is a gift, not a burden.)
The political community originates in the nature of persons. It is the nature of a person to have a conscience that "reveals to [him or her] and enjoins [him or her] to obey" the order which God has imprinted in all his creatures. This imprint is not just a physical order that is measured by science and its tools: it is most especially "a moral and religious order." And "it is this order--and not considerations of a purely extraneous, material order--which has the greatest validity in the solution of problems relating to their lives as individuals and as members of society, and problems concerning individual States and their interrelations." (Compendium, No. 384)
The Church's political vision clearly is founded on the natural law, on an order that is part of reality, of what is, an order which is given and is part of our creaturehood and createdness, an order which we do not make for ourselves, but an order to which conscience prompts us to conform. This natural order, which is a moral one and is to be distinguished from a mere physical order, is part and parcel of God's creation, of which we are part. And it reflects the divine order.
Drawing on the philosophical insights of Plato, Platonists, and Stoics, theologians such as St. Augustine or St. Thomas Aquinas put it this way: the natural law is nothing but an expression of, a participation in, the Eternal Order, the Eternal Law insofar as it relates to the human person.
This natural law is, in its most fundamental expression, found in the two-fold commandment to love God and to love one's neighbor as one's self. The Golden Rule is at the heart of politics.
As the Compendium expresses it: "Being open to both the Transcendent [that is the God who is "beyond" him, "outside" of him, "above" him] and to others is [man's] distinguishing trait. Only in relation to the Transcendent and to others does the human person reach the total and complete fulfillment of himself. This means that for the human person, a naturally social and political being, "social life is not something added one" but is part of an essential and indelible dimension. (Compendium, No. 384)
Because this order is found all about us and within us, and is part of the natural order of things, it is something that we "discover," not something we "invent." Since it is principally founded upon the use of practical reason (which of course is a limited, created faculty), it should not surprise us that there may be some development in our understanding of the natural law. It also should not surprise us that we may--from time to time, as individuals or even as cultures--get it wrong.
(In fact, that is one reason we need the Church, as the Church has been given the authority to teach, in the name of Christ himself and infallibly. And this teaching authority includes matters relating to the moral order, the natural moral law, which binds all men. With respect to morals, the Church is therefore the teacher of all mankind.)
Though the order in which the natural law inheres and which it reflects is a priori, that is, it exists prior to, and independent of, our existence, the natural moral law is not something which we know a priori. It is something which we learn a posteriori. Reality exists before we exist. We learn the facts after they exist. We come upon them. This is why the natural law is a form of ...
Rate This Article
1 - 3 of 3 Comments
Leave a Comment
More Politics & Policy News
- News to ruin your morning: IRS official who targeted conservatives for audit now oversees your Obamacare compliance
- Culture of Corruption, Obama pays Sarah Ingram extra for her harassment of conservatives
- Culture of Corruption: Why Obama's misuse of Marines is wrong
- Rubio: Obama's intimidation of tea party groups 'not in isolation'
- Editorial: Is the Scandal Ridden Obama Administration Becoming a House of Cards?
- Obama asks for more money, Marines to protect embassies
- President stands ground against Republican critics
- Eric Holder says he will investigate the IRS for Obama
- Read this most OUTRAGEOUS list of questions asked by IRS officials
Featured News
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?
Most Popular
Editorial: Is the Scandal Ridden Obama Administration Becoming a House of Cards? Read More
Did God make junk? Scientists say 98 percent of human genome is junk Read More
There's the problem! Americans are out of touch with scientific consensus on climate change Read More
Courageous Cardinal Sen Patrick O'Malley Will Not Attend Boston College Commencement Read More
Sex In Uniform: Why the Increase in Sexual Assaults in the Military? Read More
Daily Readings
Reading 1, Acts 28:16-20, 30-31
On our arrival in Rome Paul was allowed to stay in lodgings of ... Read More
Psalm, Psalms 11:4, 5, 7
Yahweh in his holy temple! Yahweh, his throne is in heaven; his ... Read More
Gospel, John 21:20-25
Peter turned and saw the disciple whom Jesus loved following ... Read More
Saint of the Day
St. Pope John I
May 18: St. John I, Pope and Martyr (Feast day - May 18) A native of ... Read More
Latest Videos
Pope to Pontifical Missionary Works: Your work is still relevant View Video
Pope rails against dictatorship of the economy View Video
May Crowning of the Virgin Mary - St Philip The Apostle Catholic Church View Video
St Thomas Aquinas Catholic School Visit to Ogwen Cottage May 2013 View Video
May 17 - Homily: St. Paschal, Profound Love For The Eucharist View Video
Marketplace
Renewing the Priestly Heart
Reflection and renewal for priests. Based on insights of Cardinal ... Read More
St Dymphna Saint Dymphna. Catholic Jewelry. Addiction. Recovery Necklace Read More




Print















This word Personhood does relate to the Biblical words "GOD is not a respecter of persons". As in the case of King David who is said to have had a heart like that of God, but when he sinned out of human weakness, got judged in the righteousness of GOD, in other words he ceased to be a person before the righteousness of God which does not change 'cause it is in the fulness. It is on this righteousness that Jesus was risen from the dead, not because he was His son, but because no fault was found in him, a perfect Son. Until GOD sees as to what He wants(which is His will) in any person, will only then that person be recognized as a person worthy of Him, thus becoming His Personhood. By ourselves it is impossible to come into this worthiness & It is for this reason that He send his Son, so that we may become In Christ through & in the worthiness of the Son, to GOD in all Holiness, to the words of Jesus Christ "I am the way, truth & the life" to the Father, for GOD in His wisdom chose each one in His Christ before the foundations were laid. In Christ there is no male or female, white or black, caste or creed, Jew or Gentile etc(no person) but to His words, My Mother, brother or sister are who do the Will of My Father, which is in Him.
The truth about the human person is grounded in scientific facts coupled with the Catholic teaching that the intrinsic human rights of every human being begins at his biological beginning and ends with his death. This principle can be known by reason alone, though devoid of faith, reason can run amuck as we have witnessed again and again in America.
The natural law is written on the heart of every man, including those who profess to be agnostic or otherwise distant from God. Not a single person is really distant from God as he loves each of us equally.
Thus we can know that when natural law is denied or ignored there is nothing but chaos be it political, sociological or otherwise. This is why it is so important to emphasize, as Pope Benedict XVI and Pope John Paul II have done, that faith and reason combine to exemplify in life itself the continuity of the natural law which is the basis for a civil, not to mention civilized society.
Judie Brown
American Life League www.all.org.
Excellent article on the natural law. Just to “push the logic” a bit, two things. First, while man comes to know the natural law a posteriori (starting point is outside the mind in the thing experienced), that experience is “known” first of all by the senses (phantasms). So it helps to clarify that the term “practical reason” (reason being an intellectual faculty) derives its concepts of the real world first through the senses, and that the concept so derived must be checked back to the thing outside the mind to make sure there is a “match” or “correspondence” with that thing. Otherwise, there is no role for the senses of man in coming to know the natural law, nor a means by which to determine the truth or falsity of his concepts. They would be a priori (starting point in the mind), instead of a posteriori. Indeed, the natural law is grounded in an empirically derived concept of “human nature”. Second, the “’common good” is misunderstood these days as meaning “the greatest good for the greatest number in society”, i.e., the majority – a very utilitarian ethics which contradicts the natural law. So it would help readers to understand that in natural law the “common good” refers instead to those goods that all human beings must have in common by virtue of the human nature that they share in common in order to “flourish” here and reach their ultimate end. So what comes first, the utilitarian “common good” of the majority, or the individual “good” of each individual in society? As Maritain once explained it, the “common good” identified empirically by natural law must “fall back upon the shoulders of each and every human being in that society” – not just to the majority.