Guest Opinion: The Barbaric Vision of 'Progressive' Heroes

By Michael Coren
1/26/2011
The Interim (www.theinterim.com/)

The voices may be different but the song, as they say, remains the same

There is nothing right or left-wing about being pro-life, but pro-lifers are repeatedly and ridiculously condemned and dismissed as being on the right. Life, however, is more important than political labels. But while we know of the murderous fascists of the 1940s, we need to understand something of those assumed to be the good guys - the socialist thinkers and writers who allegedly wanted only to make the world a better place.

Journalist for Life

Facebook Delicous MySpace

Twitter Stumble Digg

More Destinations

TORONTO, ON (The Interim) - There is nothing right or left-wing about pro-life, but pro-lifers are repeatedly and ridiculously condemned and dismissed as being on the right. Life, however, is more important than political labels. But while we know of the murderous fascists of the 1940s, we need to understand something of those assumed to be the good guys - the socialist thinkers and writers who allegedly wanted only to make the world a better place.

Thinkers such as the famous science fiction writer H.G. Wells, who between 1905 and 1940, was one of the most admired and influential men in the world. In describing his fellow socialist and some-time friend, George Bernard Shaw wrote of Wells, "Multiply the total by ten; square the result. Raise it again to the millionth power and square it again; and you will still fall short of the truth about Wells - yet the worse he behaved the more he was indulged; and the more he was indulged the worse he behaved." Shaw, by the way, lied about what he had seen in Stalin's Russia and when questioned by a Western journalist about the forced starvations in Ukraine threw a can of Russian meat at him. Wells, though, was worse.

At heart he was a social engineer. In massively best-selling books such as Anticipations and A Modern Utopia Wells wrote that he believed the world would collapse; from this collapse a new order should and would emerge. "People throughout the world whose minds were adapted to the big-scale conditions of the new time," he wrote. "A naturally and informally organized educated class, an unprecedented sort of people." A strict social order would be formed. At the bottom of it was the base.

These were "people who had given evidence of a strong anti-social disposition," including "the black, the brown, the swarthy, the yellow." Christians would also "have to go," as well as the handicapped. Wells devoted entire pamphlets to the need of "preventing the birth, preventing the procreation or preventing the existence" of the mentally and physically handicapped. "This thing, this euthanasia of the weak and the sensual is possible. I have little or no doubt that in the future it will be planned and achieved."

The people of Africa and Asia, he said, simply could never find a place in a modern world controlled by science. Better to do away with the lot. "I take it they will have to go," he said of them. Marriage as it is known would have to end but couples could form mutually agreed unions. They would list their "desires, diseases, needs" on little cards and a central authority would decide who was fitted for whom.

Population would be rigidly controlled, with forced abortion for those who were not of the right class and race. Religion would be banned, children would be raised in communes. The old and the ill would, naturally, have to be done away with and doctors would be given the authority to decide who had a right to live, who had a duty to die. On the Jews: "I met a Jewish friend of mine the other day and he asked me what would come of his people," Wells wrote. "That is exactly what is the matter with them - my people." Writing of World War I, Well stated, "throughout those tragic and almost fruitless four years of war, the Jewish spokesmen were most elaborately and energetically demonstrating that they cared not a rap for the troubles and dangers of English, French, Germans, Russians, Americans or of any other people but their own. They kept their eyes steadfastly upon the restoration of the Jews."

Wells may have been the most prominent of these socialist slaughterers but he was not the only one. The American socialist Margaret Sanger was the founder of Planned Parenthood and is still a feminist and liberal icon. Black people and immigrants in general, were "human weeds" and "reckless breeders," "spawning human beings who never should have been born." She believed in the sterilization of the mentally ill, in "racial purification" and the elimination of those she labelled the "feeble-minded." She was aware, however, that her racism might cause a few problems and warned that, "we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population"because it might provoke "their more rebellious members."

Canada's own Tommy Douglas is widely considered one this nation's more significant heroes. He is celebrated as one of our greatest and purest voices because of his commitment to socialism and fight for socialized medicine. Yet on the subject eugenics and sterilizing the mentally handicapped he said, "some have objected to sterilization on the grounds that it is depriving human beings of an unalienable right. But medical science declares that it is possible to be sterilized and yet have sexual intercourse. In the main this is all the defective asks. Among them the parental instinct is not paramount, but is entirely subordinated to the sex urge. Thus sterilization would deprive them of nothing that they value very highly, and would make it impossible for them to reproduce those whose presence could contribute little to the general well-being of society."

The list goes on. George Bernard Shaw, Sydney and Beatrice Webb and the early founders of the socialist Fabian Society. Today, the vocabulary may be less harsh and severe, but calls for population control and international abortion availability are still common. Those leading the campaign are still very much on the political left and the actual and potential victims are still invariably the poor, the handicapped, the black and the brown. The voices may be different but the song, as they say, remains the same, and is one so terribly familiar to those of us who care about life.

� 2011, The Interim. Distributed by NEWS CONSORTIUM.

- - -

The Interim is Canada�s life and family issues newspaper. Since it was founded in 1983, The Interim has provided honest reporting and insightful commentary on abortion, euthanasia, bioethics, family values and marriage.

Keywords: socialism, liberalism, euthanasia, fabian-society, population, pro-life

NEWSLETTERS »

Rate This Article

Was this helpful to you? Very Helpful Somewhat Helpful Not Helpful at All

Would you be interested in more articles like this? Yes, I am Interested No, I am not Interested

Rate Article

1 - 10 of 22 Comments

Lulu
2 years ago
Excuse me Christy, but perhaps your very astute friend should notice his name is Mr Coren, rather than Mr. Cohen. We will all be more cautious when reading your postings.
Bulbajer
2 years ago
Vance, okay. I think we've reached an impasse. If I said that Nazis were simply far right, I was wrong and I apologize. I think we have different political spectra in mind, so I won't argue with you about "extreme constitutionalism" and such.
vance
2 years ago
Bulbajer, I'm an old 'Baby-Boomer' and I remember all the way back many, many, and yes, many years that Liberals and Democrats would call right-wingers 'Nazi's'. This all began with the Communist Party calling their political foes 'Nazi's' during World War II. It was effective because Nazi's and Fascists were our war emenies. After the war, Liberals and Communists continued with the name-calling. The reason it was so successful is that the average Baby-Boomer never knew that Nazi's and Fascists are Atheistic Socialists the same as Communists. All have their roots are from Marx, Darwin, and Neitzche. A 'Right-Winger', Conservative is one who is a God and Jesus Christ believer and one who embraces and "Conserves" the Constitution of the United States of America. I don't know how an 'Extreme Constitutionalist" would equate to 'Mass Murder' because there is NO Strong Man or Party. An extreme Constitutionalist believes in Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. The individual is Supeme not the Collective or the State. The Ten Commandments and The Gospel of Jesus Christ is Law of the Land. Today's TEA Party movement might be a good example of Constitutionalists by the fact that there is NO Leader, it is entirely grassroots and organic which is what the Constitution is.
Bulbajer
2 years ago
Vance, basically you have said that the Nazis and the Communists had many things in common. Which is true. I think when you get to the extremes of the political spectrum, seemingly opposite ideologies start to seem similar. When I said that the Nazis were not far left, I was picturing far left in terms of economic and political considerations rather than the size and nature of the government. I guess "far left" can also mean totalitarianism in a sense. But so would "far right" then... ah heck, I 've confused myself. Anyway, my point is that the Nazis and Communists had differences and similarities and that lumping them together isn't really all that accurate, at least from a political point of view. If you're talking about cruelty to humanity, then that's another story.
vance
2 years ago
Bulbajer, The National Socialist Party were totalitarians. They, like the Communists, did not allow any political opposition as you pointed out the murder of Greggor Strasser as well as the Communist Party. Hitler did not nationalize all industries because he realized he would exacerbate the economic depression Germany was in. Hitler and the National Socialists were Darwinists and Neitzcheites where their Super Race idea came from. They were atheists who renounced the existence of God as Charles Darwin and Fredrich Neitzche did. The National Socialists have all in common with Marxism and are complete antithesis with the Constitution of the United States of America.
Bulbajer
2 years ago
Vance, did you read my comment? Did you research the Nazis to see if my claim made any sense? I'm assuming not.
vance
2 years ago
Bulbajer, The National Socialist Party (NAZI) isn't socialist??? HUH??? That's like saying The Communist Party isn't communist. Polar Bears aren't polar bears. Chickens aren't chickens. OK, I guess.
Binoy
2 years ago
In their wisdom, they became foolish and what men viewed as wise, GOD viewed as foolishness and what GOD viewed as wisdom (true wisdom) was seen as foolishness in men's eyes!

How very true of these socialist thinkers - for in thinking and trying to make a better place, they've created hell!
vance
2 years ago
Michael Coren, I hope you do more of these articles because this is information that needs to be out there for all to learn. This is history that will never be taught in high school or college. Your info is truth that tells us how we got where we are today. God bless.
Bulbajer
2 years ago
Techwreck, the Democrats were indeed the party of racism in the 60s. They were for a long time before that, too. But the Democrats weren't always left-leaning, and the Republicans weren't always right-leaning. In the 60s, I'm pretty sure that supporting civil rights was considered left-leaning. The Nazis were not "socialists", even though "socialism" was in their name. Some of them came from socialist backgrounds, particularly in the early years, when the party was predominantly working-class. But Hitler himself cared little for socialism and the ideals it emboddied. In fact he apparently cared very little for economics and only interfered in private business for "more important" reasosn, like taking from non-Aryans and those who thought differently from him. One of the opponents he had murdered in the Night of the Long Knives was Gregor Strasser, a true "national socialist". He and his brother Otto, who escaped Hitler, had promoted Nazism with a socialist flavor; they fervently admired the USSR. Hitler didn't like that, so out they went. And believe me, I didn't get this from the same people who try to convince me that Republicans are simply moderate Nazis.

Prev12 3 Next

Comments submitted must be civil, remain on-topic and not violate any laws including copyright. We reserve the right to delete any comments which are abusive, inappropriate or not constructive to the discussion.

Though we invite robust discussion, we reserve the right to not publish any comment which denigrates the human person, undermines marriage and the family, or advocates for positions which openly oppose the teaching of the Catholic Church.

This is a supervised forum and the Editors of Catholic Online retain the right to direct it.

We also reserve the right to block any commenter for repeated violations. Your email address is required to post, but it will not be published on the site.

We ask that you NOT post your comment more than once. Catholic Online is growing and our ability to review all comments sometimes results in a delay in their publication.

Name *

Email *

Comment *

Send me important information from Catholic Online and it's partners. See Sample

Post Comment