Skip to main content


Senator Rick Santorum: Charge to Revive the Role of Faith in the Public Square

9/14/2010

(Page 5 of 5)

It should not make us uncomfortable to call something evil if that's what it is. Having convictions doesn't mean that we don't understand the complexity of the world -- it means that we are able to prioritize the pursuit of truth and justice and call evil what it is.

Our American civilization has reflected a most healthy union of faith and reason. From long experience, we know that faith for its own sake, apart from love of truth is only a sentiment, and that reason for its own sake withers into rationalism. Neither is autonomous. If I have faith only in myself, I belong to a very small religion. And as for the right use of reason, let's remember what G. K. Chesterton said: "A madman is not the man who has lost his reason. The madman is the man who has lost everything except his reason."

In his Regensburg address, Pope Benedict XVI contrasted the Judeo-Christian revelation with the concept of God held by some outside of the Judeo-Christian world as aloof from reason. He also discussed those societies which would attempt to live without God, as in secular Europe or Communist China. In the secular West, he said, "... the subjective "conscience" becomes the sole arbiter of what is ethical. In this way, though, ethics and religion lose their power to create a community and become a completely personal matter. This is a dangerous state of affairs for humanity, as we see from the disturbing pathologies of religion and reason which necessarily erupt when reason is so reduced that questions of religion and ethics no longer concern it."

The movement in our country to fly on "one wing," reason alone, will ultimately undermine the very foundation of our country -- freedom. America is rooted in the founders' belief that free people, whose God-given rights are protected by a government that allows the individual to pursue their dreams and reap the fruits of their labor, would build the most just and prosperous society in the history of man. They were right; freedom was the key ingredient in the American experiment. Our founders understood it was relatively easy to establish freedom in our Constitution, the harder task was to create a system that would maintain it against the corrosive force of time. The author Os Guinness describes how they accomplished this as the Golden Triangle of Freedom: "Freedom requires virtue, virtue requires faith and faith requires freedom and around again."

That freedom requires virtue was explained by the political philosopher Edmund Burke, who wrote: "Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites ... Society cannot exist, unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere; and the less of it there is within, the more there must be without. It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things, that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters."

Virtue requires faith because faith is the primary teacher of morality. That is not to say that one cannot be virtuous without faith, but for society as a whole faith is the indispensable agent of virtue. Faith requires freedom. Why has America remained a deeply religious country averting the road to secularism traveled by our European brothers and sisters? Again Madison's "true remedy," the combination of "free exercise" and no religious state supported monopoly, has created a vibrant marketplace of religions extolling everywhere the word of God to inspire people to fulfill His special plan for each of us. Our founders' inspired brilliance created a paradigm that has given America the best chance of any civilization in the history of man to endure the test of time. Time, this time now in American history is putting that to the test.

I will conclude with a final consequence of what started here 50 years ago by bringing in one of the Catholic Church's foremost American advocates for religious freedom, John Courtney Murray. He advised us that the first two articles of the First Amendment are "not articles of faith, but articles of peace." What was Murray getting at? E Pluribus Unum -- out of many one. Our founders believed that if they fostered religion and the Judeo-Christian moral code we would achieve something that was never before seen in a country with so many competing faiths -- a truly tolerant, democratic and harmonious public square.

On June 12, 1775, Congress' first act was to urge a national day of "public humiliation, fasting and prayer" for which it commissioned "ministers of the gospel of all denominations" to participate. On the assigned day, Congress attended services at an Anglican Church in the morning and a Presbyterian meetinghouse in the afternoon. The following year they convened at Philadelphia's "Roman Chapel" and later a Dutch Lutheran Church. This is the vision. A vibrant, fully clothed public square; a marketplace of believers and non-believers where truth could be proffered and reasoned, and differences civilly tolerated.

One of my favorite sayings is: "We don't appreciate what we have until it's gone". For over 200 years we have been blessed with a country often described as a melting pot. The fire that helped to gently melt us together into a country where people of different faiths and cultures come together in our dynamic democracy to peaceably find common ground -- is that first freedom -- the true remedy.

What the movement spawned here 50 years ago seems to disregard is that repressing or banishing people of faith from having a say in government creates alienation which could lead to disaffection and conflict as we have seen in other countries around the world. Think about all of the people in this country from different cultures who if they lived in their native country would be sworn enemies. Yet when they come to America they are inoculated with something that enables them to work together on the school board and neighborhood associations.A key ingredient in that inoculation is the freedom of conscience that ameliorates the fear, frustration and mistrust that comes from repression.

Kennedy's speech was historic because it did offer a teachable moment. In the short term it accomplished a great good by helping to put an end to Catholic bigotry. Unfortunately, its lasting impact not only undermined the essential role that faith has successfully played in America, but it reduced religion to mere personal "belief" and helped launch a cultural revolution, proclaiming loudly that on matters of moral consequence, reason has no truths it can discern, nothing of moral significance it can claim to know, much less contribute to the public debate.

That's the "faith" that is being offered by those who want to change the time tested Golden Triangle of Freedom. You'll see it in the public square today, and it's popular because it pretends to impose nobody's values on anybody. Yet it's an illusion because it uses a cloak of "neutrality," "objectivity" and "rationality" that results in the imposition of secular values on everybody while marginalizing faith and those who believe as "moralizing theocrats".

Kennedy concluded his Houston speech by saying he did not "intend to disavow either my views or my church in order to win this election." The sad fact is he could have stood by his beliefs and won; he chose not to. Instead he charted a course that has won many elections, but has put American civilization at risk. I have always felt comfortable to be on the path our founders took, the one that is now less traveled and invites the most criticism. I do so because I believe we all have an obligation to be good stewards of this great inheritance that generations of Americans created with their last full measure of devotion.

That's why we should feel so blessed to be here at a time when the land that God has so richly blessed is being put to the test. Many generations are never called to do great things, make great sacrifices to maintain liberty. We are the fortunate ones who have the opportunity not only preserve but build on the founders' vision of freedom supported by virtue which in turn is supported by a vibrant faith -- a mutually strengthening interface of church and state that with our collective effort will keep America that beacon of hope that shining city on the hill.
Bless you and may God continue to bless America.

-----


Rick Santorum is a senior fellow at the Ethics & Public Policy Center and former U.S. Senator (R-PA).


- - -

Pope Benedict XVI's Prayer Intentions for January 2013
General Intention:
The Faith of Christians. That in this Year of Faith Christians may deepen their knowledge of the mystery of Christ and witness joyfully to the gift of faith in him.
Missionary Intention: Middle Eastern Christians. That the Christian communities of the Middle East, often discriminated against, may receive from the Holy Spirit the strength of fidelity and perseverance.

Keywords:

NEWSLETTERS »

E-mail:       Zip Code: (ex. 90001)
Today's Headlines

Sign up for a roundup of the day's top stories. 5 days / week. See Sample

Previous Page  1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Rate This Article

Very Helpful Somewhat Helpful Not Helpful at All

Yes, I am Interested No, I am not Interested

Rate Article

1 - 10 of 10 Comments

  1. John Flaherty
    2 years ago

    Mr. Carlton:
    I wish I could say that your comments ring true with me. Unfortunately, I cannot. While I understand Kennedy's need to assuage the fears of Protestant voters, I think he went about it VERY poorly.

    I once thought JFK a great man. War hero, President, Catholic, maybe even a martyr? Regrettably,as I've learned more of him, his family, and my faith, the more my awe and wonder has turned to horror and disgust. One of our own? Uh huh.
    When a man hears about the vice of a sin in Church, then sits in his President's chair and encodes that same sin or others into law, what value does his faith truly have?

    Kennedy could've used the platform of candidacy to better explain how the Church truthfully works. He could've articulated the ideas that Sen Santorum offered. Certainly he had the intelligence and gumption for it. Instead, he rendered his faith to be a mantel showpiece, a trinket to be hauled out on Sunday and provide some cultural references that many would understand.
    I'm glad to see comments like Sen Santorum's. He may be able to undo some part of the ill that Kennedy inflicted.

  2. Peter Carlton
    2 years ago

    Why would Rick Santorum be so negative about the only Catholic president, and may I say, a mighty good one, that this nation has ever had enough courage to elect.
    He very lightly touches on the anti-Catholic sentiment in this country at this time 50 years ago, with very many protestant ministers and lay people actually believing that, if elected, he would be taking his dictates, orders, or whatever you might like to call them, from Rome and the Holy Father. And I might add they would not have referred to him as the Holy Father.
    President Kennedy said, and you quoted him," I do not intend to disavow my views or "my" church in order to win this election."
    How much stronger or clearer, do you believe he could have made this statement about" his " church and the fact that he intended to wear his Catholic faith in public.
    The important decisions he had to make for this country and it's people were outstanding, and this holier than thou stuff you and some of the other supposedly "learned" Catholic scholars are writing about is mostly fodder for those who have always believed that us Catholics are going to hell in a hand basket anyway.
    To blame this Catholic president for the moral decay in this country is quite a stretch. If you take a deep look at what this family has done, and continues to do, as well as asking the rest of us to do for our less fortunate brethern. I find your comments very narrow sighted. He was not elected to be our spiritual leader. Heaven forbid if that would have ever been as much as uttered out loud.
    We have only had one, for crying out loud why would you continue to bash him.
    I wonder if your mother has, or would have enjoyed, reading this article about the president she evidently voted for and loved.
    Shame on you and the other Catholics who write this about our own. Leave this to the others who don't drink from the same cup at mass.

  3. Bruce
    2 years ago

    Very educational article. I, too, was under the impression that the constitution allowed for the separation between church and state. At a time that I have very little respect for politicians, this comes as a breath of fresh air. The government is not by the people and for the people in this age--it is now a separate entity. It has evolved into a few rich people controlling the masses, clearly what our forefathers sought freedom from over 200 years ago. Our constitution does not advocate freedom from religion, but freedom of religion. Our religious beliefs and moral compass should always be part of of the civil law equation.

  4. John Grimes
    2 years ago

    Jack Kennedy was cynical when he made this proposition 50 years ago. He wanted to be president and he would let nothing stand in his way. But to think that RIck Santorum has the charisma of Kennedy or that he will ever have even a quarter of that man's chance to be president is laughable. Santorum can deliver all the speeches he wants on any subject he wants and with whatever lucidity he can command, but I will bet everything I have that he will never give a speech from the Oval Office. Catholics and others cheering him on and urging him to run for president are simply wasting his and everyone else's time.

  5. Pam
    2 years ago

    I would vote for Rick Santorum, in a heartbeat, too! However, I would not say that JFK accomplished a "good" in the short term because it helped to put an end to Catholic bigotry because Catholic bigotry is still alive and well. Moreover, JFK expressed a half-truth (at best--or rather, at worst) regarding the role of politics--a corrupt version that's growing in intensity more and more today and is expressed by most of the 161 Catholics in Washington (only about 46 of them voted 100% pro-life and 5-6 more of them 86% of the time). Such heinous moral corruption is literally killing us in matters of "health-care" (?); it's no wonder everything else is collapsing, as well! Mr. Santorum, himself, said: "Unfortunately, its lasting impact not only undermined the essential role that faith has successfully played in America, but it reduced religion to mere personal belief and helped launch a cultural revolution, proclaiming loudly that on matters of moral consequence, reason has no truths it can discern, nothing of moral significance it can claim to know, much less contribute to the public debate....That's the 'faith' that is being offered by those who want to change the time tested Golden Triangle of Freedom. You'll see it in the public square today, and it's popular because it pretends to impose nobody's values on anybody. Yet it's an illusion because it uses a cloak of "neutrality," "objectivity" and "rationality" that results in the imposition of secular values on everybody while marginalizing faith." Sorry for repeating this quote from Mr. Santorum's speech here, but Mr. Santorum "hits the nail on the head," on the reason for the dissolution of the "Beautiful America[n]" dream of our Founders in the new form of government in vogue today--Nevertheless, "we the people," who believe in "religion and virtue" (according to John Adams, et al) can vote to bring it back into the public square this November and in 2012--if only we will!

  6. K.C.Thomas
    2 years ago

    As an Indian, I feel that in every country catholic leaders should uphold his religious teachings without a feeling of shame or inferiority complex. He has rightly said that having convictions does not mean that we dont understand the complexity of the world .... we should be able to prioritize the pursuit of truth and justice and call evil what it is . We need more dedicated and faithful catholic politicians in every country.

  7. Tom
    2 years ago

    Such an inspiration. I was going to quickly scan through his speech and then print it out, but I carefully read every word until the last period. If he runs for President I'll vote for him too. Can't get over that speech!!! God Bless Rick Santorum!!!

  8. Diane
    2 years ago

    If he ever runs for president I'll vote for him!

  9. JeanCatherine
    2 years ago

    Amen brothers and sisters.

  10. Jennifer
    2 years ago

    SANTORUM FOR PRESIDENT 2012


Leave a Comment

Comments submitted must be civil, remain on-topic and not violate any laws including copyright. We reserve the right to delete any comments which are abusive, inappropriate or not constructive to the discussion.

Though we invite robust discussion, we reserve the right to not publish any comment which denigrates the human person, undermines marriage and the family, or advocates for positions which openly oppose the teaching of the Catholic Church.

This is a supervised forum and the Editors of Catholic Online retain the right to direct it.

We also reserve the right to block any commenter for repeated violations. Your email address is required to post, but it will not be published on the site.

We ask that you NOT post your comment more than once. Catholic Online is growing and our ability to review all comments sometimes results in a delay in their publication.

Send me important information from Catholic Online and it's partners. See Sample

Post Comment


Newsletter Sign Up

Daily Readings

Reading 1, Sirach 2:1-11
My child, if you aspire to serve the Lord, prepare yourself for ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 37:3-4, 18-19, 27-28, 39-40
Put your trust in Yahweh and do right, make your home in the ... Read More

Gospel, Mark 9:30-37
After leaving that place they made their way through Galilee; ... Read More

Saint of the Day

May 21 Saint of the Day

St. Eugene de Mazenod
May 21: Eugene de Mazenod was born on August 1, 1782, at Aix-en-Provence ... Read More