|
The Battle for Life in Health Care Reform By Deacon Keith Fournier
8/1/2009 Catholic Online (www.catholic.org) An internecine battle broke out as the last week of July came to an end in Washington, D.C. It is a matter of life and death, truth or deception.
Cardinal Justin Rigali, Archbishop of Philadelphia, Chairman, USCCB Committee on Pro-Life Activities.
WASHINGTON, D.C. (Catholic Online) – Someone is right and someone is wrong. There is no middle ground on this one. The truth must be revealed and shouted from the Housetops. In fact, it really is a matter of life and death. It will frame our action and response as Pro-Life people. It must be the determining factor as to whether faithful Catholics, other faithful Christians, Pro-Life people of faith and people of good will who recognize the truth concerning the personhood of our first neighbors in the womb can participate in any Health care Plan which funds the taking of innocent human life in the womb with tax payer dollars. If this Plan does indeed mandate such blood money, we have to prepare for massive resistance because we cannot participate. Abortion is not health care. Period.
An “internecine” battle broke out in a very public way as the last week of July came to an end in Washington, D.C. It pitted "catholics United" and "Family Research Council" against each other. If eager public officials, preparing to leave town during the Congressional recess, thought this Health Care struggle was over, they were absolutely wrong. They are headed into some very hot August nights as their Pro-Life constituents INSIST upon the answer to who is telling the truth.
Chris Korzen, the Executive Director of “Catholics United” lambasted an Ad currently being aired by the "Family Research Council’s" Action arm. He accused the predominantly evangelical Pro-Life and Pro-Family group of “using abortion scare tactics to turn pro-life voters against health reform.” He added that “If the Family Research Council was truly committed to human life it would focus its efforts on ensuring that the tens of millions of Americans who currently lack heath insurance can get the care they need. This attack ad is unhelpful, untruthful, and not at all pro-life.”
Tom McClusky, a Catholic and the Senior Vice President for “FRC Action” would have none of it. He told the Catholic News Agency that “Catholics United” was either deceived or participating in deception on this critical issue, “On the issue of where in the health care legislation is abortion, Family Research Council Action agrees with Cardinal Justin Rigali, Chairman of the Pro-life Office of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops,” He cited the letter dated July 29th, 2009, from Justin Cardinal Rigali which insisted that “much needed reform must not become a vehicle for promoting an ‘abortion rights’ agenda or reversing longstanding current policies against federal abortion mandates and funding.”
We present that urgent letter for our readers, in its entirety:
"TO: Members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee
Dear Representative:
"As you consider the “America’s Affordable Health Choices Act” (H.R. 3200), I urge you to consider the overall priorities and concerns presented by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in Bishop William Murphy’s July 17 letter to all members of Congress (www.usccb.org/sdwp/national/2009-07-17-murphy-letter-congress.pdf). The bishops’ conference views health care as a basic right belonging to all human beings, from conception to natural death. We therefore have long supported universal health care reform that respects human life and dignity, provides access for all with a special concern for immigrants and the poor, preserves pluralism with respect for rights of conscience, and restrains costs while sharing them equitably.
"In this particular letter I am writing specifically about our fundamental requirement that health care legislation respect human life and rights of conscience. Much-needed reform must not become a vehicle for promoting an “abortion rights” agenda or reversing longstanding current policies against federal abortion mandates and funding. In this sense we urge you to make this legislation “abortion neutral” by preserving longstanding federal policies that prevent government promotion of abortion and respect conscience rights.
"In this regard several features of H.R. 3200, as introduced on July 14, need to be addressed:
1. The legislation delegates to the Secretary of Health and Human Services the power to make abortion a basic or essential benefit in all health plans, or in the “public plan” created by the legislation. This would be a radical change: Federal law has long excluded most abortions from federal employees’ health benefits plans and places no requirement on private plans, most of which also decline to cover elective abortions.
2. Because some federal funds are authorized and appropriated by this legislation without passing through the Labor/HHS appropriations bill, they are not covered by the Hyde amendment and other provisions that have prevented direct federal funding of abortion for over three decades. The legislation needs its own provision against abortion funding to ensure consistency with ...
Comments
The church may not impose itself on others by law but it sure has the right to speak out on moral injustice in the world.
Freedom of speech works both ways for both church and state.
By the way there really isnt separation of church and state in this country.
It just says that the state doesnt recognize any particulary state church.
Also separation of church and state is in the Russian Constitution.
Im for the church whether I like it or not.
The Lord set down the rules.
He made two important commandments but he didnt say go out and sin and let the church look the other way.
She, the church has not right to judge but she can speak up if a moral dilemma occurs.
She always has and she always will.
To our brothers and sisters suffering in other countries for persectuion.
Thank God everyday that you can speak up here and everywhere for your religious freedom without intimidation.
Hope it never changes in this country.
Jean | 8/6/2009
Still no offical comment on Friday's vote in the house from the US Bishops. The article in the following link explains in all:
http://www.lifesitenews.com/
eileen | 8/3/2009
All I have to say is separation of church and state. The church has no right to impose on the rights of others. Our fore father's were correct in doing this, look at yourselves hypocrites.
A Liberal Catholic | 8/2/2009
Post your Comment
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, antisocial behavior such as "spamming" and "trolling," or other inappropriate comments or material will not be posted on Catholic Online. Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of service. While Catholic Online invites robust discussion, we maintain the right to not print material that is patently false in its claims concerning the teaching of the Magisterium of the Catholic Church, overtly anti-Catholic or which, in the opinion of the moderator, are intended to mislead readers as to what the Catholic Church teaches. Comments DO NOT necessarily reflect the opinion or views of Catholic Online.
NEWSLETTERS »
|
RSS | Make Catholic Online Your Homepage
