Kathleen Sebelius's nomination as Secretary of Health and Human Services should be strongly opposed.
The marvelous developments in intra-uterine surgical proceedings and sonogram technology are only two of the scientific facts which accuse us of our National crime. We are engaged in a horrid contemporary version of playing with words in an effort to mask the evil. Abortion is a sin against solidarity. It is killing our neighbor, not loving them.
CHESAPEAKE, VA (Catholic Online) On Saturday February 28, 2009, the Obama Administration announced that on Monday the President will nominate Governor Kathleen Sebelius to be the Secretary of Health and Human Services. This President removed limitations on abortion by overturning the Mexico City Policy and recently announced he will remove the conscience protections for pro-life medical practitioners.
It appears that the release of news was timed to occur on the same day that “Catholics United”, a group which works in concert with “Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good”, launched its new web site entitled “Catholics for Sebelius”. On that advocacy site this group stretches accuracy beyond anything they have done before. They argue that this Governor who has been told by her Bishop, Joseph Naumann, to refrain from presenting herself for Holy Communion until she takes “the necessary steps for amendment of her life which would include a public repudiation of her previous efforts and actions in support of laws and policies sanctioning abortion” is an acceptable choice for Catholics.One is welcomed to this site with these words “Catholics across the nation are rallying behind the nomination of Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius as Secretary of Health and Human Services. Here you'll find information about Gov. Sibelius' record on issues important to Catholics, and an opportunity to register your support for her nomination.”
Let me begin with words from Francis Cardinal George which expose the error behind this organization’s claim: “Catholic Social thought is built upon the foundational truth that every single human life has an inherent human dignity and must be respected and protected. The unborn child, who is alive and is a member of the human family, cannot defend himself or herself. Good law defends the defenseless. Our present laws permit unborn children to be privately killed. Laws that place unborn children outside the protection of law destroy both the children killed and the common good, which is the controlling principle of Catholic social teaching. One cannot favor the legal status quo on abortion and also be working for the common good."
This Secretary designee, if confirmed, will make the major decisions concerning health care right when major changes in the delivery of health care services loom. She is, in my opinion, a WRONG choice for Catholics and for the true common good. Under her leadership this administration will insist that the voluntary taking of innocent human life in the first home of the whole human be considered a “medical procedure” and covered in health programs. This Governor vetoed legislation to limit abortions and held a fundraiser for notorious abortionist George Tiller who is now on trial for 19 criminal charges related to his performance of late term abortions.
“Catholics United” has a serious problem. First, Many will rightly ask whether they are being faithfully “Catholic” in taking this position? The teaching of the Magisterium of the Catholic Church on this matter is absolutely, unequivocally clear. Are they trying to confuse? Second, I maintain that this appointment does not promote the Common Good. They attempt to paint anyone who opposes this nomination and their errant position as “right wing” and against the much needed reform of our health care system. Because of that, let me explain my own positions. I am neither “right wing” nor am I an opponent of a major revision of our health care system. I have always called my self a “Whole Life/Pro-Life” Catholic Christian and citizen. I am Pro-Life, Pro-Marriage and family, Pro-Freedom (rightly understood), Pro-Poor and Pro-Peace.
I have written regularly about the true meaning of the phrase “the Common Good”. I have proposed that Catholic Social teaching should form a framework within which faithful Catholics, other Christians, other people of faith and all people of good will work together to truly build a just society, a civilization of love. My efforts have placed me, at times, outside of the realm of acceptability in both major political parties. They have elicited opposition from the so called “right”, the so called “left” and many others in between. For example, my opposition to capital punishment has not found an ear in the leadership of either major political party in the US. My opposition to the initial foray into Iraq as having been unjustified under any interpretation of the so called “just war theory”, placed me in opposition to the growing number of “neo-cons” on the “right” and their colleagues, the “neo-liberals” on the “left”. I have dared to express concerns that if a market economy places profits over people, families and the common good, it can devolve into what the late Servant of God John Paul II rightly called “savage capitalism”.
“Catholics United” as well as “Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good” argue that when ...
Obama anouncement to nominate another Catholic to do his dirty works shows how much hate he has for the Church and its teaching. Everything he does, is well calculated. It is not by chance that he appoints all those Catholics in positions that he knows, would anger the faithful. I bet he is laughing at us. How sad. Just to show you how vindictive he can be.
Nicole | 3/11/2009
Reach out and personally support one woman who is pregnant and for any number of reasons believes abortion is her only realistic choice. Provide money for food, an apartment, education, counseling, etc. Then support another and another and another until there are no woman left who believe they have no choice other than abortion.
For the love of God and of His people, choose the beatitudes instead of political rhetoric, often based on nonsense and which demeans us all - all of humanity. Those who put on white hats and anoint themselves the "good Catholics" and place vile labels on those who approach this sad situation differently with love and discretion and respect debase the lives not only of the unborn but of the living who choose to help pregnant mothers and babies rather than engage in hateful speech. It is divisive and does not help one single human life.
Rather than rallying the generous who see the divine in every human life, it makes one wonder why we would want children born into a world where self-righteous bickering and condemnation from the powerful has become even remotely acceptable let alone "worthy." Not in my book. Not by a long shot!
CJ | 3/10/2009
Hello Paul,
Tell me. If you say that your numbers don't lie regarding abortion, and that is what you base your stance on, then could you please tell me the chances that Catholicism - the early Christian Church - had at succeeding as a continuing religion? I'm sure we could estimate.
Or what are the numbers that Jesus calculated as He bore his heart to God in the Garden of Gethesemane to determine whether or not He should go through with the Crucifixion?
What about the numbers that Elijah calculated when he stacked the logs on top of each other, drenched them in water, and still expected that God would light his pyre on fire?
Did Daniel have any numbers when he slew Bel? What of Solomon; did he rely on statistical data when ordered the guard to split the infant in half before the real mother appeared?
Or Paul, when he made his way to Rome? But why talk of Paul? What about Peter? What were the numbers that Peter relied upon when he turned back around to be crucified? Did Abraham need numbers to figure that God wouldn't let his only son be sacrificed instead of a Ram?
For all your boasting of being an MIT undergrad, what you lack is the understanding that God did not make you so that you might create a box to which you might contain and dictate to him what ought to be and what ought not to be.
I could never understand these "catholics" who claim to be Catholics, and yet, they issue forth such protestations of "disagreement" with the Pope. You are not Catholics, but Protestants, and you politicize your stance. Allow me to share some numbers with you, Paul.
When Peter told Ananias and his wife to sell all that they had and bring it to the Church, he found them to be lacking in the gold that the brought back. Both of them lied, because their own numbers were more important to them than the command of the head of the Church. They were struck dead instantly.
I won't judge you to be a "good man", nor a "bad one". However, what I do know is that Good men seek what is "Good", and they recognize that when "Truth" is revealed to them, they have a duty to defend "Truth". There is no relativity in Truth. If you cannot listen to the Truth being spoken by the successor of Peter and accept it, then you really ought not call yourself Catholic.
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, antisocial behavior such as "spamming" and "trolling," or other inappropriate comments or material will not be posted on Catholic Online. Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of service. While Catholic Online invites robust discussion, we maintain the right to not print material that is patently false in its claims concerning the teaching of the Magisterium of the Catholic Church, overtly anti-Catholic or which, in the opinion of the moderator, are intended to mislead readers as to what the Catholic Church teaches. Comments DO NOT necessarily reflect the opinion or views of Catholic Online.