• HOME
  • MOST POPULAR
  • EMAIL
  • NEWSLETTERS
  • SHOPPING
  • BOOKSTORE
  • TRAVEL
  • FIND A CHURCH
  • VIDEO
Weather | RSS  |  Advertisers
Catholic Online

| Politics

catholic.org Web
View Comments  Comments
Email this Article  Email this Article
Printer-Friendly  Printer-Friendly
Letters to Editor  Letters to Editor
Guest Opinion: Where do we go from here?
By Rev. Dr. Clenard Howard Childress, Jr.
1/18/2009

Black Genocide (blackgenocide.org/home.html)

What would Martin Luther King say to a nation where an African-American baby is 5 times more likely to be killed in the womb than a Caucasian baby?

But where do we go from here? We can go nowhere until this nation recognizes all of its citizens, especially our most vulnerable, many whose 'unalienable Rights' are presently denied. Until our national values reflect the Giver of our rights —
But where do we go from here? We can go nowhere until this nation recognizes all of its citizens, especially our most vulnerable, many whose 'unalienable Rights' are presently denied. Until our national values reflect the Giver of our rights — "endowed by their Creator" — as the Declaration of Independence describes to us, there will be no 'there' there when we arrive.
MONTCLAIR, N.J. (Black Genocide.org) - This is probably the most asked question presently in America since the end of the Civil War, but I am wondering: who is asking it more? Due to the historical implications and the political climate throughout the world, the Global spotlight is clearly on the United States. The world wants to see how Barack Obama will navigate the tumultuous course ahead of him.

In his Election Night Acceptance Speech he referenced Dr. Martin Luther King's famous and prophetic speech, "I've been to the mountain top." Barack Obama said, "We may not get there in one year or four years." It was at that point there seemed to be a degree of uncertainty and this is totally understandable when one considers the state of economic and social affairs of our country and global unrest. I would personally encourage and insist the nation ask another question along with the previous inquiry: 'where do we go from here and what will it look like when we get there?'

In Dr. Martin Luther King's last and most radical presidential address to the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, he entitled his message just what we find ourselves asking at the moment: "Where Do We Go From Here?" Martin said, "First we must massively assert our dignity and worth, we must stand up amidst a system that will oppress us and develop an unassailable and majestic sense of values." Martin Luther King then says that the priority in getting to your destination, are your values, not economy. If that's what's needed then the journey must be delayed indefinitely until we gain those unassailable, unmovable, indestructible values that are divine, lofty and exalted.

But where do we go from here? We can go nowhere until this nation recognizes all of its citizens, especially our most vulnerable, many whose 'unalienable Rights' are presently denied. Until our national values reflect the Giver of our rights — "endowed by their Creator" — as the Declaration of Independence describes to us, there will be no 'there' there when we arrive. In so saying, as Martin Luther King was speaking at a church conference in Nashville Tennessee, he spoke across the decades these profoundly portentous words:

"There must be the recognition of the sacredness of human personality. Deeply rooted in our political and religious heritage is the conviction that every man is an heir to a legacy of dignity and worth. Our Hebraic Christian tradition refers to this inherent dignity of man in the biblical term the image of God. This innate worth referred to in the phrase the image of God is universal, shared in equal portions by all men. There is no graded scale (not pay scale) of essential worth; there is no divine right of one race that differs from the divine right of another. Every human has etched in his personality the indelible stamp of the creator. The idea of dignity and worth of human personality is expressed eloquently and unequivocally in the Declaration of Independence."

Allan Guttmacher reveals that the most dangerous place for an African-American to be is in the womb of their African-American mother. When the Man on the Mountain, Barack Obama, says one of the first things he is going to do is to get the Freedom of Choice Act passed, FOAC would eliminate all state prohibitions and restrictions on abortion, the leading cause of death of African-Americans; I do not want to go to that land. When King went up, he said, "I've seen the promised land. I may not get there with you but we as a people will one day get to the promise land." And what land is this? A land with unassailable and majestic values; a land where America lives out its creed; a land where the endowed rights of the Creator are given to all of its citizens, even the unborn!

Ironically, when Dr. Martin Luther King gave this address, he was deeply concerned with the rate of infant mortality. Dr. King said, "The rate of infant mortality among Negroes is double that of whites and there are twice as many Negroes dying in Vietnam as whites in proportion to their size in the population." In Iraq, 6% of the deaths are African-Americans yet African-Americans make up 12% of the population. When compared to the war against children in the womb, 37% of all abortions are African-Americans or more than 3 times the percentage of representation. 52% of all African-American pregnancies are ended tragically through abortion.

When I read of Martin's deep concerns over the infant mortality rate in the 60s, what would Dr. King say if he could have lived in a nation where 16 million African American infants were victims of the abortion industry? Even if you take into consideration AIDs, violent crimes, accidents, cancer and heart disease, this number would not account for half the amount of infants killed in the womb by abortion. What would Martin Luther King say to a nation where an African-American baby is 5 times more likely to be killed in the womb than a Caucasian baby? Where do we go from here, and what will it look like when we get there if Obama's agenda comes to fruition?

Interestingly, one day a newsman came to Martin Luther King and said, "Dr. King, don't you think you're going to have to stop now opposing the war and be more in line with the administration's policy. As I understand it, it has hurt the budget of your organization and people who once respected you, have lost respect for you. Don't you feel you really have to change your position?"

Dr. King answered, "Sir, I'm sorry you don't know me. I'm not a consensus leader. I do not determine what is right and wrong by looking at the budget of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. I've not taken a Gallup Poll of the majority opinion. Ultimately a genuine leader is not a searcher of consensus, but a molder of consensus. On some positions, cowardice ask the question, is it expedient? And then, expedience comes along and asks the questions, is it politic? Vanity asks the question, is it popular? Conscience asks the question, is it right?"

I absolutely concur!

Rev. Dr. Rev. Dr. Clenard H. Childress, Jr., is the senior pastor of The New Calvary Baptist Church in Montclair, NJ., the founder of the website Blackgenocide.org and president of Life Education And Resource Network, Northeast.He is a contributing writer for Catholic Online



Comments
Im going to pray that Obama has a change of heart when he comes to his senses.
Im hoping that while in office he sees something bigger than he is.
My hope is that babies will survive the next generation.
My hope is that we eliminate the negative side to Women's so called reproduction rights.
The truth will set you free.
Amen brothers and sisters.
Holly | 1/21/2009
Abortion is the new holocaust. In the 1930's and 1940's Adolf Hitler presided over the Jewish holocaust that killed some six million Jews. When Barack Hussein Obama signs the so-called Freedom of Choice Act he will be presiding over the worst holocaust in the history of the world. It will not be millions of babies being killed but billions. He will be the 21st Century's Hitler. The people who voted for him, especially the so-called Christians who voted for him, will be just as responsible for this holocaust. And, like the German people of the time, will they deny knowing what was happening? I'm afraid they will.

From what I have been reading, abortionists actually seek out black women to try to get them to have abortions. So this is a double holocaust. It is an attack on all babies but it seems to be, especially, an attack on black babies. I find it ironic that Hitler killed Jews because he hated them. Barack Hussein Obama will be killing black babies. Does he hate his own race? I wonder if that could be one of the reasons why not all black people are happy with him being elected.
Harold Olsen | 1/19/2009
Statistics have shown in fact that most abortion seekers are not women of color, but in fact, middle class white women or white women of generally good social standing and sufficient economic means. That is not to say that women of color, including Black women, don't obtain abortion but we need to be clear that the problem of abortion is not only a problem of others. As part of a consistent ethic of life, equal concern should be shown for children of all colors who face the death threat of poverty and violence in communities throughout our country in particular. The Gospel of Life demands that.
Lisa Burke | 1/18/2009
Post your Comment
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, antisocial behavior such as "spamming" and "trolling," or other inappropriate comments or material will not be posted on Catholic Online. Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of service. While Catholic Online invites robust discussion, we maintain the right to not print material that is patently false in its claims concerning the teaching of the Magisterium of the Catholic Church, overtly anti-Catholic or which, in the opinion of the moderator, are intended to mislead readers as to what the Catholic Church teaches. Comments DO NOT necessarily reflect the opinion or views of Catholic Online.
Name:


Email:


Comments:





RATE THIS
Was this helpful to you? Would you like to see more on this subject?
Very Helpful Yes, I am Interested
Somewhat Helpful No, I am not Interested
Not Helpful at All


NEWSLETTERS »

E-mail Address:    Gender:    Zip Code: (ex. 90001)

Today's Headlines
Sign up for a roundup of the day's top stories. 5 days / week. See Sample



Today's Headlines - News by E-Mail
Sign up for a roundup of the day's top stories. 5 days / week. See Sample
  
  1. Reading 1, 1 Mc 6:1-13
    King Antiochus, meanwhile, was making his way through the Upper Provinces; he had heard that ... More »
  2. Gospel, Lk 20:27-40
    Some Sadducees -- those who argue that there is no resurrection -- approached him and they put ... More »
SHARE & BOOKMARK

MORE U.S. NEWS »
MOST POPULAR »
Parish Starter Kit. Help your parishioners invite inactive Catholics to consider returning to active church participation. The ...
 
Written in the original language of Gen. 11:1; full text from Ex. 20; same color granite as Mt. Sinai; engraved on both sides; ...

News | Featured | Finance | A & E | Home & Family | PRWire | Encyclopedia | Bible | Prayers | Vocations | Saints & Angels | Life | Books | Directory | Services
Copyright 2009 Catholic Online. All materials contained on this site, whether written, audible or visual are the exclusive property of
Catholic Online and are protected under U.S. and International copyright laws, © Copyright 2009 Catholic Online. Any unauthorized
use, without prior written consent of Catholic Online is strictly forbidden and prohibited.