Skip to content

Supreme Court free speech ruling is actually a defeat for free speech

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)
4/2/2014 (2 years ago)
Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

Ruling says people can support as many candidates as they like -- but limit how much you can donate to one candidate

According to a new ruling, wealthy donors shouldn't be limited in how many candidates they can contribute to during an election. That's the decision rendered by the Supreme Court. There is one important stipulation: there remains a maximum donation that can be made to a single candidate.

In defense, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., in the controlling opinion in the 5-4 ruling, said that while the government has an interest in preventing corruption of federal officeholders, individuals have political rights that include being able to give to as many candidates as they want.

In defense, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., in the controlling opinion in the 5-4 ruling, said that while the government has an interest in preventing corruption of federal officeholders, individuals have political rights that include being able to give to as many candidates as they want.

Highlights

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)
Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)
4/2/2014 (2 years ago)

Published in Politics & Policy

Keywords: Supreme Court, political contributions, ruling


LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - The ruling is sure to bring controversy. Opponents say that conservatives are dismantling the campaign finance system one ruling at a time.

In defense, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., in the controlling opinion in the 5-4 ruling, said that while the government has an interest in preventing corruption of federal officeholders, individuals have political rights that include being able to give to as many candidates as they want.

It is better to light one tiny candle than to curse the darkness --

"Money in politics may at times seem repugnant to some, but so too does much of what the First Amendment vigorously protects," the chief justice wrote. "If the First Amendment protects flag burning, funeral protests, and Nazi parades - despite the profound offense such spectacles cause - it surely protects political campaign speech despite popular opposition."

The current limit rules that a donor can't give more than $123,200 to candidates, parties and political action committees. Of that amount, only $48,600 can go directly to candidates.

In other words, if someone wants to give the maximum donation, he could only contribute to nine candidates.

Chief Justice Roberts argues that it illogical that someone couldn't give to a 10th candidate or more. Roberts says that the government didn't offer a clear line on where corruption would come into play.

Defenders of the law posed a hypothetical, saying that if someone were allowed to give the maximum to every political candidate and party, it could amount to $3.5 million, which could then be redistributed to other campaigns by the candidates and parties themselves.

Campaign finance advocates are concerned that those candidates and parties could then collude and siphon the money back to a single candidate the donor had wanted to benefit in the first place, which would effectively break the contribution limit.

"We think the risk of corruption is real," Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr. told the justices when the case was argued last October.

Justice Roberts' ruling was joined by Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Samuel A. Alito Jr. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote an opinion joining in the judgment, though he would have gone further in undoing the limit on how much can be given to individual campaigns.

The court's four leftist-leaning justices dissented. In an opinion written by Justice Stephen G. Breyer that blasted the majority ruling, calling it devastating to democracy.

"It creates a loophole that will allow a single individual to contribute millions of dollars to a political party or to a candidate's campaign," Justice Breyer wrote. "Taken together with Citizens United v. Federal Election [Commission], today's decision eviscerates our nation's campaign finance laws, leaving a remnant incapable of dealing with the grave problems of democratic legitimacy that those laws were intended to resolve."

---


'Help give every student and teacher Free resources for a world-class moral Catholic education'


Copyright 2017 - Distributed by THE CALIFORNIA NETWORK

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for MARCH 2017
Support for Persecuted Christians.
That persecuted Christians may be supported by the prayers and material help of the whole Church.


Comments


More Politics & Policy

Will Neil Gorsuch overturn Roe v. Wade? Watch

Image of Neil Gorsuch is a pro-life justice who could help save children from abortion.

Donald Trump's Supreme Court replacement pick, Neil Gorsuch is sailing though his confirmation hearing and is on his way to a confirmation ... continue reading


New Mexico bishops warn politicians, 'We speak for the Church' Watch

Image of The bishops have warned the politicians of New Mexico not to construe their personal opinions as consistent with Church teaching.

The bishops of New Mexico have issued a statement warning Catholic politicians not to take public stances against the teachings of their ... continue reading


Was Trump wiretapped? One tantalizing clue says YES Watch

Image of President Trump believes his office was wiretapped before the election.

Did Obama spy on Trump during the election? On March 4, President Trump accused former president, Obama of spying on him. The allegations ... continue reading


Obama ready for more! Former president plans return to politics Watch

Image of Eric Holder and Barack Obama are ready to team up again.

Barack Obama is preparing to return to the political stage, just over a month after relinquishing the presidency to Donald Trump. His ... continue reading


Clinton contributor, Johnny Chung makes revealing 'life insurance' video against the DNC over fear of assassination

Image of Johnny Chung recorded a tell-all video admitting China funded Bill Clinton's re-election campaign (DNC).

Johnny Chung was a major contributor to Bill Clinton's re-election campaign in the mid-90s. Hundreds of thousands of dollars were illegally ... continue reading


Never Miss any Updates!

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers.

Catholic Online Logo

Copyright 2017 Catholic Online. All materials contained on this site, whether written, audible or visual are the exclusive property of Catholic Online and are protected under U.S. and International copyright laws, © Copyright 2017 Catholic Online. Any unauthorized use, without prior written consent of Catholic Online is strictly forbidden and prohibited.