Skip to content

Three female high court judges weigh in with contraception stipulation in Obamacare

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)
3/26/2014 (3 years ago)
Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

Hobby Lobby, among others, say stipulation violates their religious freedoms

Supreme Court Justices Kagan, Sotomayor and Ginsburg are now questioning the corporate challengers who want exemptions from providing contraception under Obamacare, or health care reform. Both Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties say that this violates their rights to freedom of religion.

Supreme Court Justices Kagan, Sotomayor and Ginsburg are now questioning the corporate challengers who want exemptions from providing contraception under Obamacare, or health care reform

Supreme Court Justices Kagan, Sotomayor and Ginsburg are now questioning the corporate challengers who want exemptions from providing contraception under Obamacare, or health care reform

Highlights

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)
Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)
3/26/2014 (3 years ago)

Published in Politics & Policy

Keywords: Contraception mandate, Supreme Court


LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - The three women of the Supreme Court dominated questioning during this week's oral arguments. The case will determine whether Hobby Lobby, a Christian-owned craft store chain, and Conestoga Wood Specialties, a cabinet company, can be exempted.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg pressed the corporate challengers. Justice Sotomayor started by asking that if corporations can object on religious grounds to providing contraception coverage, could they also object to vaccinations or blood transfusions?

No child need ever go to bed hungry -- go here!

The lawyer representing the challengers, Paul Clement said that contraception is different as the government has already given an exemption to religious nonprofits. Kagan then said that there are several medical treatments to which some religious groups object. If corporations could object to providing coverage for those treatments, she argued, "Everything would be piecemeal. Nothing would be uniform."

Arguments for the challengers say the issue is centered on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, which is aimed at preventing laws that substantially limit a person's religious freedom. That ruling grew out of a conflict over whether two Native Americans could be dismissed from their jobs as drug counselors for using drugs in a religious ritual.

The authors of that law said they intended it to be a protection of religious rights, not an excuse to foist religious principles on others.

In response, Justice Ginsberg said it "seems strange" that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which was passed by both parties, could have generated such support if lawmakers thought corporations would use it to enforce their own religious beliefs.

Justice Kagan then added that the corporate challengers are taking an "uncontroversial law" like the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and making it into something that would upend "the entire U.S. code."  This would allow companies to object to employees on religious grounds to laws on sex discrimination, minimum wage, family leave and child labor.

"How can courts know whether a corporation holds a religious belief? And what if it's just the beliefs of the leadership, not the entire company? What happens to a non-religious minority in a corporation?" Justice Sotomayor said.
 
Both Sotomayor and Justice Kagan then noted that since nobody is forcing Hobby Lobby or Conestoga to provide health insurance, they can simply pay the tax penalty instead.

---


'Help give every student and teacher Free resources for a world-class moral Catholic education'


Copyright 2017 - Distributed by THE CALIFORNIA NETWORK

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for JUNE 2017
National Leaders.
That national leaders may firmly commit themselves to ending the arms trade, which victimizes so many innocent people.


Comments


More Politics & Policy

Supreme Court sides with church in playground case Watch

Image of The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of religious freedom, but the ruling is limited.

The Supreme Court has ruled 7-2 in favor of Trinity Lutheran Church, that Missouri's denial of the church's application to have its ... continue reading


Democrats are the real Republican MVPs and here's why Watch

Image of Nancy Pelosi is the real MVP of the Republican party.

Nancy Pelosi, long the reigning queen of the Democratic party, is about to lose her crown. Under her leadership, the Democratic Party has ... continue reading


Why do liberals want to kill conservatives? Here's a list of liberal threats and attacks on conservatives since mid-2016 Watch

Image of In his own words, liberal terrorist, James Hodgkinson wanted to kill as many Republicans as possible.

When people don't like the outcomes of political decisions, they can become passionate. There was no shortage of conservative outrage ... continue reading


BREAKING: Jerusalem has fallen Watch

Image of Islam is the only religion in the world intent upon spreading by militant means. True believers, people who understand the Koran as written and who follow Islam as it was practiced for centuries after Mohammad, will not stop until they are contained, dead, or have converted the world to their belief. We know because they look us in the eye and tell us so.

The Crusades never ended. Despite popular belief, the world's most ardent Muslims covet Jerusalem. And they have no intention of ending ... continue reading


Islam is not a religion of peace, and here's what should be done to stop it spreading Watch

Image of It is no coincidence the Islamic State uses the seal of Muhammad as its official symbol.

There is only one kind of Islam in the world, and the politically correct ignore this fact at their peril. To understand the risk posed by ... continue reading


Never Miss any Updates!

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers.

Catholic Online Logo

Copyright 2017 Catholic Online. All materials contained on this site, whether written, audible or visual are the exclusive property of Catholic Online and are protected under U.S. and International copyright laws, © Copyright 2017 Catholic Online. Any unauthorized use, without prior written consent of Catholic Online is strictly forbidden and prohibited.