Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Andrew M. Greenwell, Esq.

10/14/2012 (2 years ago)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

Roe v. Wade is directly inimical to the Declaration of Independence's right to life.

The right to life is in our Constitution.  There is no right to an abortion in our Constitution.  Look at our Constitution, look at every jot and tittle of it, look even at its penumbras and emanations of it, and you will not find a right to an abortion. 

Highlights

By Andrew M. Greenwell, Esq.

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

10/14/2012 (2 years ago)

Published in Politics & Policy

Keywords: life, constitution, abortion, Lincoln


CORPUS CHRISTI, TX (Catholic Online) - The right to life is in our Constitution.  There is no right to an abortion in our Constitution.  Look at our Constitution, look at every jot and tittle of it, look even at its penumbras and emanations of it, and you will not find a right to an abortion. 

Nowhere.

But, you might object, the majority of the justices on the United States Supreme Court say it's there.  But, you are probably thinking to yourself, Roe v. Wade says it's there.  But, you might also note, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its commitment to Roe v. Wade in 1992, in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

All those things may be true, but I say nevertheless: the right to life is in our Constitution. There is no right to an abortion in our Constitution.

Roe v. Wade and its progeny are built upon a dishonest jurisprudence, one not based upon the Constitutional text in any honest way.

It is Roe v. Wade that is unconstitutional because it has no real basis in the Constitution.

Now, I am a lawyer.  I have sworn without any mental reservation to uphold the Constitution of the United States.  And the Constitution which I swore to uphold does not recognize Roe v. Wade.

Let me explain why with a personal story.

In my third year of law school, I had to apply with the Texas Board of Law Examiners for a law license.  In the form that I was required to fill out there was a section that asked whether I supported, without any mental reservation, the Constitution of the United States.
 
I wrote down yes, but I added "insofar as the law of God allows."  My concern was that I was not about to support Roe v. Wade (and also Griswold v. Connecticut, but that's a different issue) because the Constitution of the United States does not contain the right to abortion.  I was not about to swear that I supported the notion that our Constitution contains a right to abortion.

The Board of Law Examiners was not particularly pleased at my answer, and it summoned me to Austin to determine whether I was "morally fit" to practice law since I would only swear to uphold the Constitution "insofar as the law of God" allows.

That's something, isn't it?  To be considered possibly "morally unfit" because you believe that our Nation, and the Constitution which frames it, is "under God."

Nevertheless, I went before that Committee to defend myself.  And I explained that I did not think that the Constitution contained a right to abortion, and that I could not swear to uphold the Constitution if that Constitution contained a right to abortion.

And you know what? 

The Committee decided after all that I was morally fit to practice law, that I did not have to swear that the Constitution contains within it a right to abortion, so the Constitution that I swore to uphold, and I still swear to uphold, does not contain a right to abortion.

But really, what happened to me before that Committee of the Board of Law Examiners is a symbol of what has happened to our Constitution and our Nation.

When your loyalty is questioned because you are pro-life, when your loyalty to the Constitution is questioned because you believe that our laws--including our Constitution--must be understood as being "under God," something of great significance has happened.

What is it that has happened?

The best way to understand this issue is to borrow an image from Abraham Lincoln.  It is found in a famous "Fragment" of his writings.

During the civil war, Abraham Lincoln was reflecting upon Proverbs 25:11. Proverbs 25:11 reads:  "A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in a setting [or frame] of silver."

Reflecting on this proverb, Lincoln wrote that there is "something back" of the Constitution and our Nation.  There is something more, something that supports the Constitution.

This "something back" of the Constitution is what gave spirit to, which informed the ordered liberty behind the Constitution. 

That "something back" of the Constitution, and not necessarily the Constitution itself, is what contributed to our "great prosperity."

This "something back" of the Constitution and our Nation is something living, as it can be found "entwining itself more closely about the human heart" of Americans.

This "something back" is the "philosophical cause" of our Constitution and our Nation.

For Lincoln, that "something back" of the Constitution was expressed in the Declaration of Independence. 

The Declaration of Independence, one should never forget, declares that we are all created equal. 

It declares that we are "endowed by [our] Creator with inherent and inalienable rights."

It declares that "among these" rights is, not the right to abortion, but rather the right to "Life"

It declares that governments are "instituted among men," not to secure the right to an abortion, but rather "to secure" the right to "Life."

It declares most fundamentally that we are subject to, and in fact derive the very basis of our government from, "the laws of nature and of nature's God."

For Lincoln, the Declaration of Independence contained within it the "something back" of our Constitution.  It was the "word, 'fitly spoken,' which has proved an "apple of gold" to us." 

The Constitution and the Union are a "picture of silver, subsequently framed around" the "apple of gold" of the Declaration.

"The picture was made, not to conceal, or destroy the apple; but to adorn, and preserve it.  The picture was made for the apple--not the apple for the picture," said Lincoln.

What this means is that the Constitution is made, not to conceal or destroy the right to Life, but to adorn and preserve it.

That "something back" of the Constitution is a "culture of life," a culture of life that leads to a culture of liberty, that leads to a culture for the pursuit of happiness.

And that's why Roe v. Wade is a lie and is not part of our Constitution because it conceals and destroys the right to life, it does not adorn and preserve the right to life.  It blurs and breaks the "golden apple."

Roe v. Wade is directly inimical to the Declaration of Independence's right to life. 

I am unapologetic about it:  It is simply un-American, unpatriotic to allow the slaughter under color of right of 1.5 million of the weakest Americans annually, and what is more, to call it part of our Constitution.

It's un-American, frankly it's downright criminal and immoral, to take what used to be felony crimes--mala in se--and make them Constitutional rights.

It is a political blasphemy.

What it does is to take the frame of silver and make it into a frame of pewter.

What it does is take the apple of gold and replace with pyrite, with fool's gold.

Roe v. Wade is directly set against the "something back" of the Constitution. 

Now Lincoln gave us, that is all Americans who want to be true to their founding traditions, our marching orders:  "So let us act," Lincoln said, "that neither picture or apple, shall ever be blurred, or broken."

Let us then act, so that neither the Constitution nor our Declaration be blurred or broken. 

Let us act so that the right to life in our Constitution and in our Declaration is not blurred or broken, but is extended to all including those Americans who are most defenseless and most disenfranchised, those Americans who happen to be in the womb of their mothers.

Let us act to recapture the Constitution so that it is a frame of silver.

Let us act to recapture a political philosophy and a jurisprudence based upon the apple of gold.
That gold standard is a political philosophy based upon the natural law, the law of "Nature and Nature's God,"

Let us act to recapture this "something back" of our Constitution.

Liberal law professors and liberal justices have stolen both the silver frame and apple of gold from us.

Every one of our founding fathers was steeped in the "something back" of the Constitution, the natural law. 

Every one of our founding fathers that was a lawyer had read Blackstone's Commentaries on the laws, who said: "Good and wise men, in all ages . . . have supposed, that the deity . . . has constituted an eternal and immutable law, which is, indispensably, obligatory upon all mankind, prior to any human institution whatever."

"This is what is called the law of nature, which, being coeval with mankind, and dictated by God himself, is, of course superior in obligation to any other.  It is binding over all the globe, in all countries at all times.  No human laws are of any validity, if contrary to this; and such of them as are valid, derive all their authority, mediately or immediately, from this original."

This is the apple of gold.

Every one of our founding fathers was familiar with books about the natural law: books by Hooker, Grotius, Hutcheson, Pufendorf, Burlamaqui, Vattel. The fact that most of us, even lawyers, don't even know who Hooker, Grotius, Hutcheson, Pufendorf, Burlmaqui, and Vattel are shows how our law schools have failed us.

How can we understand the "something back" of the Constitution when we don't know the minds of our fathers?

Instead we read the liberal political philosophy of John Rawls or Richard Rorty in our law schools, a political philosophy where there is no such things as the "something back" of the Constitution.

Now, to teach our children, ourselves, and our judges about this "something back" of our Constitution is probably something beyond the political process.  It is the work of inculturation, perhaps even evangelization, but not politics.

But what's not beyond the political process is to fix the frame, to make sure that it is not of pewter, but that it is once again of silver.

And the way to do that is to put in Supreme Court justices who are "strict constructionists," or "textualists," or "originalists."  Men like Justice Scalia.  Men like Justice Thomas.

For strict constructionists, textualists, or originalists, the Constitutional analysis regarding the right to abortion is easy.  As Justice Antonin Scalia put it: the decision regarding abortion is, from the perspective of the U.S. Constitution, is "absolutely easy," a "no brainer."

Why is it a "no brainer"?

Why because of the first thing I said: the right to life is in our Constitution.  There is no right to an abortion in our Constitution. 

(This is an adaptation of a speech given at the American Freedom Rally in Corpus Christi, Texas.)

-----

Andrew M. Greenwell is an attorney licensed to practice law in Texas, practicing in Corpus Christi, Texas.  He is married with three children.  He maintains a blog entirely devoted to the natural law called Lex Christianorum.  You can contact Andrew at agreenwell@harris-greenwell.com.

---


Pope Francis: end world hunger through 'Prayer and Action'


Copywriter 2015 - Distributed by THE NEWS CONSORTIUM

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for March 2015
Universal:
Scientists: That those involved in scientific research may serve the well-being of the whole human person.
Evangelization: Contribution of women: That the unique contribution of women to the life of the Church may be recognized always.


Rosaries, Crosses, Prayer Cards and more... by Catholic Shopping .com


Comments


More Politics & Policy

Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security exposed as favoring wealthy 'White House allies,' including Hillary Clinton's brother Watch

Image of

By Abigail James (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Department of Homeland Security's latest watchdog report reveals the agency's second man in charge, Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, repeatedly "played favorites" when it came to well-connected participants in an investor-visa program. LOS ... continue reading


IT BEGINS NOW: Conservative rebel, Sen. Ted Cruz becomes first Republican to announce presidential bid Watch

Image of

By Abigail James (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Senator Ted Cruz, from Texas, has become the first Republican to announce a campaign for presidency in the 2016 election. Taking to Twitter, Cruz announced his candidacy with a 30-second video message posted shortly after midnight on March 23. LOS ANGELES, CA ... continue reading


What is going on here? U.S. threatens sanctions against Israel while making excuses for Iran Watch

Image of Even more trying to Israel would be any lessening of Obama's opposition to Palestinian efforts to join the International Criminal Court. The Palestinian Authority will formally join the court this coming April 1.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

What is going on here? Israel, the United States' only clear ally in the Middle East is now facing tough new sanctions from the Obama White House. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - According to Politico's Michael Crowley, "Obama officials must now decide ... continue reading


Large study reveals startling media bias toward Democrats and Obama during presidential elections Watch

Image of

By Abigail James (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

The United States and international press show signs of strictly favoring the Democratic party. According to the Washington Examiner, a study of 130,213 news articles during the 2012 presidential election shows just how pro-Democratic the news sources were. LOS ... continue reading


Did the Obama administration give a massive amount of money to an anti-Israeli group to keep Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu out? Watch

Image of Is President Obama attempting to overthrow Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu?

By Matt Waterson (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Declining to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu while he was in the United States earlier this month is one thing, but President Obama may have crossed a line by illegally financing an American nonprofit group that was attempting to keep ... continue reading


Iranian president finds diplomacy with U.S. to be active 'jihad' Watch

Image of Describing his country's diplomacy with the United States as an active

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Describing his country's diplomacy with the United States as an active "jihad," Iranian President Hassan Rouhani says the diplomatic front is just as significant in advancing Tehran's nuclear ambitions. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Rouhani praised the ... continue reading


Match made in Heaven: Hillary Clinton as secretive as Bill Clinton; deletes over 30,000 emails Watch

Image of

By Abigail James (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

As the upcoming Presidential election approaches, former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton continues to be pressed on the issue of her private email account and private servers. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Finally breaking her silence, Clinton has admitted ... continue reading


Playing hardball: Senate Republicans warn Iran that nuclear weapons are off the table Watch

Image of President Obama is not happy with Senate Republicans, after they wrote a letter to Iran, warning the nation that they will not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons.

By Matt Waterson (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Senate Republicans are wholly committed to preventing Iran from gaining the ability to produce nuclear weapons, weapons with which the Islamic Republic has routinely said that it will use to destroy long-time U.S. ally Israel. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - ... continue reading


TERRORISTS BACK IN ACTION: More than 100 Guantanamo Bay detainees released back into terrorist activities Watch

Image of The United States has confirmed that 116 detainees have been

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

It appears that for dozens of suspects, Guantanamo Bay proved to be a failure in terms of national security. The United States has confirmed that 116 detainees have been "transferred" out of the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. These terrorist suspects are now ... continue reading


Crucial decision on 'Obamacare' goes before Supreme Court Watch

Image of Chief Justice John Roberts surprised many in 2012 when he voted to uphold the law. He said very little, in a clear strategy not to tip his hand either way.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

The future of health care in America is on the table as defined by President Barack Obama and his purported health care reform - known as "Obamacare," is both in serious jeopardy and before the Supreme Court. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - The Supreme Court ... continue reading


All Politics & Policy News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Daily Readings

Reading 1, Ezekiel 37:21-28
21 say, "The Lord Yahweh says this: I shall take the ... Read More

Psalm, Jeremiah 31:10, 11-12, 13
10 Listen, nations, to the word of Yahweh. On the ... Read More

Gospel, John 11:45-57
45 Many of the Jews who had come to visit Mary, and ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for March 28th, 2015 Image

St. Venturino of Bergamo
March 28: Dominican preacher and missionary crusader. A native of Bergamo, ... Read More

Inform, Inspire & Ignite Logo

Find Catholic Online on Facebook and get updates right in your live feed.

Become a fan of Catholic Online on Facebook


Follow Catholic Online on Twitter and get News and Product updates.

Follow us on Twitter