Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Andrew M. Greenwell, Esq.

10/14/2012 (2 years ago)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

Roe v. Wade is directly inimical to the Declaration of Independence's right to life.

The right to life is in our Constitution.  There is no right to an abortion in our Constitution.  Look at our Constitution, look at every jot and tittle of it, look even at its penumbras and emanations of it, and you will not find a right to an abortion. 

Highlights

By Andrew M. Greenwell, Esq.

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

10/14/2012 (2 years ago)

Published in Politics & Policy

Keywords: life, constitution, abortion, Lincoln


CORPUS CHRISTI, TX (Catholic Online) - The right to life is in our Constitution.  There is no right to an abortion in our Constitution.  Look at our Constitution, look at every jot and tittle of it, look even at its penumbras and emanations of it, and you will not find a right to an abortion. 

Nowhere.

But, you might object, the majority of the justices on the United States Supreme Court say it's there.  But, you are probably thinking to yourself, Roe v. Wade says it's there.  But, you might also note, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its commitment to Roe v. Wade in 1992, in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

All those things may be true, but I say nevertheless: the right to life is in our Constitution. There is no right to an abortion in our Constitution.

Roe v. Wade and its progeny are built upon a dishonest jurisprudence, one not based upon the Constitutional text in any honest way.

It is Roe v. Wade that is unconstitutional because it has no real basis in the Constitution.

Now, I am a lawyer.  I have sworn without any mental reservation to uphold the Constitution of the United States.  And the Constitution which I swore to uphold does not recognize Roe v. Wade.

Let me explain why with a personal story.

In my third year of law school, I had to apply with the Texas Board of Law Examiners for a law license.  In the form that I was required to fill out there was a section that asked whether I supported, without any mental reservation, the Constitution of the United States.
 
I wrote down yes, but I added "insofar as the law of God allows."  My concern was that I was not about to support Roe v. Wade (and also Griswold v. Connecticut, but that's a different issue) because the Constitution of the United States does not contain the right to abortion.  I was not about to swear that I supported the notion that our Constitution contains a right to abortion.

The Board of Law Examiners was not particularly pleased at my answer, and it summoned me to Austin to determine whether I was "morally fit" to practice law since I would only swear to uphold the Constitution "insofar as the law of God" allows.

That's something, isn't it?  To be considered possibly "morally unfit" because you believe that our Nation, and the Constitution which frames it, is "under God."

Nevertheless, I went before that Committee to defend myself.  And I explained that I did not think that the Constitution contained a right to abortion, and that I could not swear to uphold the Constitution if that Constitution contained a right to abortion.

And you know what? 

The Committee decided after all that I was morally fit to practice law, that I did not have to swear that the Constitution contains within it a right to abortion, so the Constitution that I swore to uphold, and I still swear to uphold, does not contain a right to abortion.

But really, what happened to me before that Committee of the Board of Law Examiners is a symbol of what has happened to our Constitution and our Nation.

When your loyalty is questioned because you are pro-life, when your loyalty to the Constitution is questioned because you believe that our laws--including our Constitution--must be understood as being "under God," something of great significance has happened.

What is it that has happened?

The best way to understand this issue is to borrow an image from Abraham Lincoln.  It is found in a famous "Fragment" of his writings.

During the civil war, Abraham Lincoln was reflecting upon Proverbs 25:11. Proverbs 25:11 reads:  "A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in a setting [or frame] of silver."

Reflecting on this proverb, Lincoln wrote that there is "something back" of the Constitution and our Nation.  There is something more, something that supports the Constitution.

This "something back" of the Constitution is what gave spirit to, which informed the ordered liberty behind the Constitution. 

That "something back" of the Constitution, and not necessarily the Constitution itself, is what contributed to our "great prosperity."

This "something back" of the Constitution and our Nation is something living, as it can be found "entwining itself more closely about the human heart" of Americans.

This "something back" is the "philosophical cause" of our Constitution and our Nation.

For Lincoln, that "something back" of the Constitution was expressed in the Declaration of Independence. 

The Declaration of Independence, one should never forget, declares that we are all created equal. 

It declares that we are "endowed by [our] Creator with inherent and inalienable rights."

It declares that "among these" rights is, not the right to abortion, but rather the right to "Life"

It declares that governments are "instituted among men," not to secure the right to an abortion, but rather "to secure" the right to "Life."

It declares most fundamentally that we are subject to, and in fact derive the very basis of our government from, "the laws of nature and of nature's God."

For Lincoln, the Declaration of Independence contained within it the "something back" of our Constitution.  It was the "word, 'fitly spoken,' which has proved an "apple of gold" to us." 

The Constitution and the Union are a "picture of silver, subsequently framed around" the "apple of gold" of the Declaration.

"The picture was made, not to conceal, or destroy the apple; but to adorn, and preserve it.  The picture was made for the apple--not the apple for the picture," said Lincoln.

What this means is that the Constitution is made, not to conceal or destroy the right to Life, but to adorn and preserve it.

That "something back" of the Constitution is a "culture of life," a culture of life that leads to a culture of liberty, that leads to a culture for the pursuit of happiness.

And that's why Roe v. Wade is a lie and is not part of our Constitution because it conceals and destroys the right to life, it does not adorn and preserve the right to life.  It blurs and breaks the "golden apple."

Roe v. Wade is directly inimical to the Declaration of Independence's right to life. 

I am unapologetic about it:  It is simply un-American, unpatriotic to allow the slaughter under color of right of 1.5 million of the weakest Americans annually, and what is more, to call it part of our Constitution.

It's un-American, frankly it's downright criminal and immoral, to take what used to be felony crimes--mala in se--and make them Constitutional rights.

It is a political blasphemy.

What it does is to take the frame of silver and make it into a frame of pewter.

What it does is take the apple of gold and replace with pyrite, with fool's gold.

Roe v. Wade is directly set against the "something back" of the Constitution. 

Now Lincoln gave us, that is all Americans who want to be true to their founding traditions, our marching orders:  "So let us act," Lincoln said, "that neither picture or apple, shall ever be blurred, or broken."

Let us then act, so that neither the Constitution nor our Declaration be blurred or broken. 

Let us act so that the right to life in our Constitution and in our Declaration is not blurred or broken, but is extended to all including those Americans who are most defenseless and most disenfranchised, those Americans who happen to be in the womb of their mothers.

Let us act to recapture the Constitution so that it is a frame of silver.

Let us act to recapture a political philosophy and a jurisprudence based upon the apple of gold.
That gold standard is a political philosophy based upon the natural law, the law of "Nature and Nature's God,"

Let us act to recapture this "something back" of our Constitution.

Liberal law professors and liberal justices have stolen both the silver frame and apple of gold from us.

Every one of our founding fathers was steeped in the "something back" of the Constitution, the natural law. 

Every one of our founding fathers that was a lawyer had read Blackstone's Commentaries on the laws, who said: "Good and wise men, in all ages . . . have supposed, that the deity . . . has constituted an eternal and immutable law, which is, indispensably, obligatory upon all mankind, prior to any human institution whatever."

"This is what is called the law of nature, which, being coeval with mankind, and dictated by God himself, is, of course superior in obligation to any other.  It is binding over all the globe, in all countries at all times.  No human laws are of any validity, if contrary to this; and such of them as are valid, derive all their authority, mediately or immediately, from this original."

This is the apple of gold.

Every one of our founding fathers was familiar with books about the natural law: books by Hooker, Grotius, Hutcheson, Pufendorf, Burlamaqui, Vattel. The fact that most of us, even lawyers, don't even know who Hooker, Grotius, Hutcheson, Pufendorf, Burlmaqui, and Vattel are shows how our law schools have failed us.

How can we understand the "something back" of the Constitution when we don't know the minds of our fathers?

Instead we read the liberal political philosophy of John Rawls or Richard Rorty in our law schools, a political philosophy where there is no such things as the "something back" of the Constitution.

Now, to teach our children, ourselves, and our judges about this "something back" of our Constitution is probably something beyond the political process.  It is the work of inculturation, perhaps even evangelization, but not politics.

But what's not beyond the political process is to fix the frame, to make sure that it is not of pewter, but that it is once again of silver.

And the way to do that is to put in Supreme Court justices who are "strict constructionists," or "textualists," or "originalists."  Men like Justice Scalia.  Men like Justice Thomas.

For strict constructionists, textualists, or originalists, the Constitutional analysis regarding the right to abortion is easy.  As Justice Antonin Scalia put it: the decision regarding abortion is, from the perspective of the U.S. Constitution, is "absolutely easy," a "no brainer."

Why is it a "no brainer"?

Why because of the first thing I said: the right to life is in our Constitution.  There is no right to an abortion in our Constitution. 

(This is an adaptation of a speech given at the American Freedom Rally in Corpus Christi, Texas.)

-----

Andrew M. Greenwell is an attorney licensed to practice law in Texas, practicing in Corpus Christi, Texas.  He is married with three children.  He maintains a blog entirely devoted to the natural law called Lex Christianorum.  You can contact Andrew at agreenwell@harris-greenwell.com.

---


Pope Francis: end world hunger through 'Prayer and Action'


Copywriter 2015 - Distributed by THE NEWS CONSORTIUM

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for June 2015
Universal:
That immigrants and refugees may find welcome and respect in the countries to which they come.
Evangelization: That the personal encounter with Jesus may arouse in many young people the desire to offer their own lives in priesthood or consecrated life.


Rosaries, Crosses, Prayer Cards and more... by Catholic Shopping .com


Comments


More Politics & Policy

Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee speaks out on Obama's gay pride light show and the legalization of gay marriage Watch

Image of

By Hannah Marfil (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

In celebration of the Supreme Court's gay marriage ruling, President Obama lit up the White House with rainbow colors, which garnered a response from Republican, former Arkansas governor and now presidential candidate Mike Huckabee. Huckabee was noted as saying that ... continue reading


Supreme Court 'unwrote laws of nature' GOP presidential candidate Mike Huckabee declares Watch

Image of

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Saying that the Supreme Court tried to "unwrite the laws of nature and the laws of nature's God" when it legalized gay marriage across the nation last week, GOP presidential candidate Mike Huckabee also pointed out the fact that President Barack Obama himself ... continue reading


'They will stand behind lying Brian Williams, but won't stand behind people that tell it like it is': Donald Trump fired from NBC for controversial immigrant statements Watch

Image of Donald Trump retired from The Apprentice after announcing his presidential bid.

By Abigail James (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

NBC has made the decision to cut ties with Donald Trump, over his political view and controversial statements regarding immigration made during his presidential announcement. Donald Trump and NBC have had a relationship, including Trump's produced Miss USA and Miss ... continue reading


When is the best time to take out Social Security? Watch

Image of 100-year-old woman.

By Talia Ramos (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Financial advisers usually advice their clients to take Social Security benefits at the age of 70 for maximum growth. However, it is found that most people don't take that advice, as they are likely to withdraw what they have saved up as soon as they hit retirement. A ... continue reading


IT'S NOT OVER: Freedom of Religion may trump same-sex marriage victories Watch

Image of

By Matt Hadro and Adelaide Mena, CNA/ETWN News

Friday's Supreme Court ruling against the traditional understanding of marriage may pose huge obstacles to the free exercise of religion and conscience across the U.S., the nation's bishops have said in response to the decision. Washington D.C.(CNA/EWTN News) - ... continue reading


Decisions on same-sex marriage, power-plant emissions now in the hands of Supreme Court Watch

Image of Six major cases, all of them affecting the American Way of Life are in front of the Supreme Court.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Six major cases, all of them affecting the American Way of Life are in front of the Supreme Court. Decisions regarding same-sex marriages, power plant emissions and execution methods will all be rendered by either Friday or early next week. LOS ANGELES, CA ... continue reading


Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett's family has strong communist roots, files prove Watch

Image of Valerie Jarrett's father, pathologist and geneticist Dr. James Bowman, has been found to have had extensive ties to Communist associations and individuals.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Does the apple truly fall far from the tree? Recently uncovered files show that Valerie Jarrett, a senior adviser to U.S. President Barack Obama and trusted confidant has family ties with those with communist leanings. These uncovered files prove that Jarrett's ... continue reading


Donald Trump surges in popularity polls in New Hampshire Watch

Image of Dismissed by political professionals, who view him as little more than a

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Dismissed by political professionals, who view him as little more than a "novelty candidate," there's no denying Donald Trump's surge in popularity in opinion polls in New Hampshire. The billionaire developer and reality TV show star comes in at second among ... continue reading


Terrorists who pose as journalists will no longer have protection from the U.S. new Pentagon manual states Watch

Image of The new manual from the pentagon is designed to reflect the fact that many fighters do not wear military uniforms or pretend to be trusted civilians to hit targets.

By Matt Waterson (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

The Pentagon has released new instructions on dealing with terrorists, or more specifically, terrorists who pose as journalists or journalists who work with terrorist groups. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - The "Department of Defense Law of War Manual" is a ... continue reading


Offensive or not? University of California issues bizarre speech police to tell you what not to say Watch

Image of The University of California administration issues handout that recommend students refrain from using some words.

By Talia Ramos (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

University of California is providing suggestions on what to say and what not to say within the campus grounds. However, the words and statements they deem as offensive, sexist and racist are not simply explicit words with direct negative connotations. According to ... continue reading


All Politics & Policy News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Daily Readings

Reading 1, Genesis 22:1-19
1 It happened some time later that God put Abraham to ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 115:1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 8-9
1 Not to us, Yahweh, not to us, but to your name give ... Read More

Gospel, Matthew 9:1-8
1 He got back in the boat, crossed the water and came ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for July 2nd, 2015 Image

St. Bernardino Realino
July 2: St. Bernardino Realino was born into a noble family of Capri, ... Read More

Inform, Inspire & Ignite Logo

Find Catholic Online on Facebook and get updates right in your live feed.

Become a fan of Catholic Online on Facebook


Follow Catholic Online on Twitter and get News and Product updates.

Follow us on Twitter