Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Deacon Keith Fournier

1/10/2011 (5 years ago)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

Court held, in effect, that because the Cross is a Christian Symbol it must be removed from a war memorial

This 9th Circuit opinion is an example of a growing governmental hostility toward religious faith, religious symbols, and, in particular, Christian faith and Christian symbols, in the public square. The effort to scrub the public square of such religious expression and symbols is a threat to religious freedom and represents an incorrect application of the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution. 

The Cross at the Mt. Soledad War Memorial

The Cross at the Mt. Soledad War Memorial

Highlights

By Deacon Keith Fournier

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

1/10/2011 (5 years ago)

Published in Politics & Policy

Keywords: Soledad, Cross, religious liberty, Deacon Keith Fournier, First Amendment, Free Speech, Free exercise, establishment clause, First Amendment


WASHINGTON, DC (Catholic Online) - On Monday January 4, 2011, a three judge panel of the United States 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed its long awaited opinion in what has been popularly called the "Mount Soledad Cross Case", Trunk v. City of San Diego, Case No. 08-56415. In effect, they held that because the Cross is a Christian Symbol it must be removed from a war memorial.

I know that some who read my assessment will take exception. However, I will not "nuance" the anti-Christian bigotry revealed in the opinion of these three unelected black robed Federal Judges. They held that the Mount Soledad cross, which has stood on Mount Soledad since 1913, has somehow now become a violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution simply because they say it has.

All who are concerned about the growing hostility toward religious speech and expression in the United States have watched this case with great interest.  I make my assessment as a constitutional lawyer who has long questioned the current establishment clause law in our Nation. In 1992 following the incomprehensible Supreme Court opinion in Lee v Weisman, while serving as the Executive Director of the American Center for Law and Justice, a public interest law firm, I wrote a law review article entitled "In the Wake of Weisman: The Lemon Test is Still a lemon but the Psycho-coercion Test is more bitter Still".

In that article, after tracing the history of the interpretation of the Establishment clause of the First Amendment to the US Constitution and the developments of the last few decades, I predicted the insanity that would follow from the efforts of the Supreme Court to apply the so called "Lemon Rule" (named after the Courts 1971 opinion in Lemon v Kurtzman) and it's ever expanding "interpretations" and permutations. That is precisely what has occurred.  We have experienced a judicial ping pong game of incomprehensible opinions requiring a showing that religious symbols have a "secular" purpose - as though religion and the common good are mutually exclusive!

Let me demonstrate the level of hostility toward religion and religious symbols in the Court's own words. The Court, with great concern, took judicial notice that "After the Cross's dedication in 1954" there were "Easter services at the Memorial annually until at least 2000, and other religious ceremonies have been held there since. The annual Easter services included readings from the Bible, a Christian prayer and benediction, and songs such as "Jesus Christ is Risen Today" and "All Hail the Power of Jesus' Name." 

They decried the fact that, "The Cross's importance as a religious symbol has been a rallying cry for many involved in the litigation surrounding the Memorial. LiMandri (a Catholic lawyer with the Thomas More Law Center seeking to preserve the cross) and the Thomas More Law Center were integral in devising the plan to designate the land as a national veterans' memorial."

They critically pointed out that the Thomas More Law Center "publicly characterized the campaign to save the Cross in religious terms-for example, as a "spiritual battle. LiMandri declared that "Christ won the war on Calvary. These are just kind of mop-up battles . . . . LiMandri also participated in a fifty-four day prayer movement in front of the Cross that opened with the singing of "Immaculate Mary," and the prayer of twenty mysteries of the rosary.. Other Christian advocacy groups like the American Family Association, the American Center for Law & Justice, and Fidelis launched national petition campaigns for the Cross; an intercessory prayer movement was held by the Christian Defense Counsel outside the White House."

This 9th Circuit opinion is an example of a growing governmental hostility toward religious faith, religious symbols, and, in particular, Christian faith and Christian symbols, in the public square. The effort to scrub the public square of such religious expression and symbols is a threat to religious freedom, runs contrary to our founding documents, and is unfaithful to our history as a free people. It also represents an incorrect application of the Establishment Clause, found in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. 

This opinion also demonstrates that the 2005 Supreme Court decision of Van Orden v. Perry, a "ten commandments" case, has now made the illogic of Establishment Clause Jurisprudence even more pronounced in the United States.  Now, even the convoluted trail left by the Lemon case and its progeny can be abandoned by a Court, under the ruse of an "exception" to the Lemon analysis, only to be replaced by Judicial whimsy.

Federal Judges now make up their own rules by which they decide whether a religious symbol, especially a Christian religious symbol, will be allowed to stand on public land or in a public building. There is not even a pretense that the actual words of the Establishment Clause have any effect in this new world of the judicial oligarchy. The 224 page opinion rendered by the 9th Circuit in the Mt Soledad case is one more example of why it is absolutely essential that we reclaim the "Separation of Powers" doctrine and rein in Federal Judges and Courts.

The Establishment Clause is best understood as an "anti-establishment" clause. It was intended to prohibit the "establishment" of one particular religion - in the sense of a Federal or State sponsored Church which mandated adherence from unwilling citizens. The American founders fled coercive approaches to religion which compelled adherence to a particular sect. Yet, they were not anti-religious.

They were assuredly not against religious symbols or religious expression. Our history is filled with them. Or, more accurately, it once was. Religious symbols are no longer seen as a wonderful sign of the history of the West and the American founding by the new Judicial Oligarchs. Rather they are seen as a threat to the secularist order. When they are allowed they must be demonstrated to have been eviscerated of any religious meaning and somehow thereby rendered "secular" and acceptable.

This Court showed hostility toward the Cross writing, "[C]onsidering the entire context of the Memorial, the Memorial today remains a predominantly religious symbol. The history and absolute dominance of the Cross are not mitigated by the belated efforts to add less significant secular elements to the Memorial.... The fact that the Memorial also commemorates the war dead and serves as a site for secular ceremonies honoring veterans cannot overcome the effect of its decades-long religious history...The Memorial's relatively short history of secular usage does not predominate over its religious functions so as to eliminate the message of endorsement that the Cross conveys."

They seemed particularly offended by the size of the cross noting "(W)e cannot overlook the fact that the Cross is forty-three feet tall. It physically dominates the Memorial, towering over the secular symbols placed beneath it, and is so large and placed in such a prominent location that it can be seen from miles away."

The disjointed legal opinion concluded,  "[A]fter examining the entirety of the Mount Soledad Memorial in context-having considered its history, its religious and non-religious uses, its sectarian and secular features, the history of war memorials and the dominance of the Cross-we conclude that the Memorial, presently configured and as a whole, primarily conveys a message of government endorsement of religion that violates the Establishment Clause".

Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice, is one of our Nations' leading constitutional lawyers. The ACLJ has been involved in the case as a "Friend of the Court" defending the monument and the Cross. Their European counterpart, the European Center for Law and Justice, is involved in the defense of crucifixes in public schools as the new secular religious cleansers have sought to remove any vestige of the Christian history of Europe.  As usual, the ACLJ's summary of the 9th Circuit opinion is the clearest available and I commend it to our readers. You can find it here: http://www.aclj.org/media/pdf/ACLJ_MtSoledadOpinionSummary_20100105.pdf

The ACLJ called the 9th Circuits opinion a "Faulty Ruling." I agree. However, it is much worse than that. It is one more example of a judicial oligarchy at work and a threat to religious freedom. 

---


Pope Francis: end world hunger through 'Prayer and Action'


Copyright 2016 - Distributed by THE CALIFORNIA NETWORK

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for August 2016
Universal:
Sports: That sports may be an opportunity for friendly encounters between peoples and may contribute to peace in the world.
Evangelization: Living the Gospel: That Christians may live the Gospel, giving witness to faith, honesty, and love of neighbor.



Comments


More Politics & Policy

MULTIPLE SOURCES: Hillary Clinton has MS Watch

Image of Hillary Clinton routinely requires help to go up steps. Is this a sign she has MS?

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Several sources have anonymously reported that Hillary Clinton has multiple sclerosis. These sources come from within her own inner circle. They consider themselves informants, who may be uncomfortable with her final, going-for-broke rise to power as the Clinton Crime ... continue reading


Top Clinton aide worked for alleged Islamist supremacy publication Watch

Image of Clinton's promotion of Abedin reveals she cares little about the people she claims to care about.

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Hillary Clinton's chief of staff, Huma Abdein, worked for an alleged racist, Arab-supremacy publication for 12 years while also taking a job with Hillary Clinton. Abdein's mother remains editor-in-chief of the publication. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - Huma ... continue reading


PAYOLA! Associated Press blows whistle, Hillary Clinton is so corrupt the media can't cover for her anymore Watch

Image of Hillary Clinton's supporters know she's crooked. They still don't care.

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

The Associated Press has blown the lid off the Clinton Foundation, exposing it for what it is. It is a machine designed to facilitate corruption. And the chief engineer of that machine is about to become president. Good job? LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - ... continue reading


Getting Berned? Class action against Debbie Wassarman Schultz and DNC goes forward Watch

Image of Debbie Wassermann Schultz has been outed in leaked documents rigging the primary in favor of Hillary Clinton.

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

A suit against the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Debbie Wasserman Schultz will proceed. The class action was filed on behalf of Bernie Sanders supporters. The suit makes several claims against the DNC and Schultz. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - ... continue reading


Hillary Clinton's campaign aide a radical Muslim? Watch

Image of Huma Abedin worked as editor for radical Muslim magazine (politico).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Hillary Clinton is a favored presidential nominee by women everywhere - but are her supporters aware their beloved nominee's campaign aide worked for a radical Muslim journal for twelve years? LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Huma Abedin, a longtime aide to Clinton ... continue reading


FBI Source: We Failed America, Revealing Clinton Emails en mass Would Bring Down US government Watch

Image of

By Tony Johnson

"There is enough for her and the entire government to be brought down", stated an FBI source, "My opinion is the entire government is guilty of treason... If leaking data en mass destroys my country, we betray the country. If we do nothing we betray the country" LOS ... continue reading


'I would knock the hell out of them': Trump on strategy to fight ISIS Watch

Image of Donald Trump reveals strategy to combat ISIS.

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is notorious for staying mum about his plans to fight ISIS but the business tycoon recently revealed his controversial plan to fight terror. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - According to <a ... continue reading


Trump campaign signs stolen in series of stunts - Owners resort to trickery Watch

Image of More people are reporting their Trump campaign signs missing.

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Some of Donald Trump's supporters received a rude awakening when they looked out to their lawns and found someone had stolen their Trump campaign signs. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Donald Trump has made quite a name for himself, particularly when he takes to ... continue reading


Bill Clinton criticizes FBI director, defends Hillary, fools nobody Watch

Image of Bill Clinton, famous liar, vainly attempted to defend Hillary Clinton from the careful findings of a yearlong FBI investigation.

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Pathological liar Bill Clinton attacked FBI director James Comey, for his scathing review of Hillary Clinton's felonious use of an unsecured, private email server. Lying Bill Clinton referred to the director's statements as "bull." LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) ... continue reading


Free speech is only for DEMOCRATS - A genius put together ten minutes of CNN cutting off ANYONE who says anything critical about Hillary Clinton Watch

Image of Media bias is killing democracy in America.

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

A genius has put together a ten minute video of CNN and MSNBC cutting off anyone who bucked their pro-Clinton narratives. Guests who questioned the Clinton's background, or the anti-Trump bias of the media, were cut off systematically. The media most emphatically ... continue reading


All Politics & Policy News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Subscribe to Catholic OnlineYouTube Channel

the FEED
by Catholic Online

Daily Readings

Reading 1, First Corinthians 1:1-9
1 Paul, called by the will of God to be an apostle of Christ Jesus, and ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 145:2-3, 4-5, 6-7
2 Day after day I shall bless you, I shall praise your name for ever and ... Read More

Gospel, Matthew 24:42-51
42 'So stay awake, because you do not know the day when your master is ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for August 25th, 2016 Image

St. Louis King of France
August 25: St. Louis, King of France, patron of Tertiaries, ... Read More