Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Deacon Keith Fournier

1/10/2011 (5 years ago)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

Court held, in effect, that because the Cross is a Christian Symbol it must be removed from a war memorial

This 9th Circuit opinion is an example of a growing governmental hostility toward religious faith, religious symbols, and, in particular, Christian faith and Christian symbols, in the public square. The effort to scrub the public square of such religious expression and symbols is a threat to religious freedom and represents an incorrect application of the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution. 

The Cross at the Mt. Soledad War Memorial

The Cross at the Mt. Soledad War Memorial

Highlights

By Deacon Keith Fournier

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

1/10/2011 (5 years ago)

Published in Politics & Policy

Keywords: Soledad, Cross, religious liberty, Deacon Keith Fournier, First Amendment, Free Speech, Free exercise, establishment clause, First Amendment


WASHINGTON, DC (Catholic Online) - On Monday January 4, 2011, a three judge panel of the United States 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed its long awaited opinion in what has been popularly called the "Mount Soledad Cross Case", Trunk v. City of San Diego, Case No. 08-56415. In effect, they held that because the Cross is a Christian Symbol it must be removed from a war memorial.

I know that some who read my assessment will take exception. However, I will not "nuance" the anti-Christian bigotry revealed in the opinion of these three unelected black robed Federal Judges. They held that the Mount Soledad cross, which has stood on Mount Soledad since 1913, has somehow now become a violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution simply because they say it has.

All who are concerned about the growing hostility toward religious speech and expression in the United States have watched this case with great interest.  I make my assessment as a constitutional lawyer who has long questioned the current establishment clause law in our Nation. In 1992 following the incomprehensible Supreme Court opinion in Lee v Weisman, while serving as the Executive Director of the American Center for Law and Justice, a public interest law firm, I wrote a law review article entitled "In the Wake of Weisman: The Lemon Test is Still a lemon but the Psycho-coercion Test is more bitter Still".

In that article, after tracing the history of the interpretation of the Establishment clause of the First Amendment to the US Constitution and the developments of the last few decades, I predicted the insanity that would follow from the efforts of the Supreme Court to apply the so called "Lemon Rule" (named after the Courts 1971 opinion in Lemon v Kurtzman) and it's ever expanding "interpretations" and permutations. That is precisely what has occurred.  We have experienced a judicial ping pong game of incomprehensible opinions requiring a showing that religious symbols have a "secular" purpose - as though religion and the common good are mutually exclusive!

Let me demonstrate the level of hostility toward religion and religious symbols in the Court's own words. The Court, with great concern, took judicial notice that "After the Cross's dedication in 1954" there were "Easter services at the Memorial annually until at least 2000, and other religious ceremonies have been held there since. The annual Easter services included readings from the Bible, a Christian prayer and benediction, and songs such as "Jesus Christ is Risen Today" and "All Hail the Power of Jesus' Name." 

They decried the fact that, "The Cross's importance as a religious symbol has been a rallying cry for many involved in the litigation surrounding the Memorial. LiMandri (a Catholic lawyer with the Thomas More Law Center seeking to preserve the cross) and the Thomas More Law Center were integral in devising the plan to designate the land as a national veterans' memorial."

They critically pointed out that the Thomas More Law Center "publicly characterized the campaign to save the Cross in religious terms-for example, as a "spiritual battle. LiMandri declared that "Christ won the war on Calvary. These are just kind of mop-up battles . . . . LiMandri also participated in a fifty-four day prayer movement in front of the Cross that opened with the singing of "Immaculate Mary," and the prayer of twenty mysteries of the rosary.. Other Christian advocacy groups like the American Family Association, the American Center for Law & Justice, and Fidelis launched national petition campaigns for the Cross; an intercessory prayer movement was held by the Christian Defense Counsel outside the White House."

This 9th Circuit opinion is an example of a growing governmental hostility toward religious faith, religious symbols, and, in particular, Christian faith and Christian symbols, in the public square. The effort to scrub the public square of such religious expression and symbols is a threat to religious freedom, runs contrary to our founding documents, and is unfaithful to our history as a free people. It also represents an incorrect application of the Establishment Clause, found in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. 

This opinion also demonstrates that the 2005 Supreme Court decision of Van Orden v. Perry, a "ten commandments" case, has now made the illogic of Establishment Clause Jurisprudence even more pronounced in the United States.  Now, even the convoluted trail left by the Lemon case and its progeny can be abandoned by a Court, under the ruse of an "exception" to the Lemon analysis, only to be replaced by Judicial whimsy.

Federal Judges now make up their own rules by which they decide whether a religious symbol, especially a Christian religious symbol, will be allowed to stand on public land or in a public building. There is not even a pretense that the actual words of the Establishment Clause have any effect in this new world of the judicial oligarchy. The 224 page opinion rendered by the 9th Circuit in the Mt Soledad case is one more example of why it is absolutely essential that we reclaim the "Separation of Powers" doctrine and rein in Federal Judges and Courts.

The Establishment Clause is best understood as an "anti-establishment" clause. It was intended to prohibit the "establishment" of one particular religion - in the sense of a Federal or State sponsored Church which mandated adherence from unwilling citizens. The American founders fled coercive approaches to religion which compelled adherence to a particular sect. Yet, they were not anti-religious.

They were assuredly not against religious symbols or religious expression. Our history is filled with them. Or, more accurately, it once was. Religious symbols are no longer seen as a wonderful sign of the history of the West and the American founding by the new Judicial Oligarchs. Rather they are seen as a threat to the secularist order. When they are allowed they must be demonstrated to have been eviscerated of any religious meaning and somehow thereby rendered "secular" and acceptable.

This Court showed hostility toward the Cross writing, "[C]onsidering the entire context of the Memorial, the Memorial today remains a predominantly religious symbol. The history and absolute dominance of the Cross are not mitigated by the belated efforts to add less significant secular elements to the Memorial.... The fact that the Memorial also commemorates the war dead and serves as a site for secular ceremonies honoring veterans cannot overcome the effect of its decades-long religious history...The Memorial's relatively short history of secular usage does not predominate over its religious functions so as to eliminate the message of endorsement that the Cross conveys."

They seemed particularly offended by the size of the cross noting "(W)e cannot overlook the fact that the Cross is forty-three feet tall. It physically dominates the Memorial, towering over the secular symbols placed beneath it, and is so large and placed in such a prominent location that it can be seen from miles away."

The disjointed legal opinion concluded,  "[A]fter examining the entirety of the Mount Soledad Memorial in context-having considered its history, its religious and non-religious uses, its sectarian and secular features, the history of war memorials and the dominance of the Cross-we conclude that the Memorial, presently configured and as a whole, primarily conveys a message of government endorsement of religion that violates the Establishment Clause".

Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice, is one of our Nations' leading constitutional lawyers. The ACLJ has been involved in the case as a "Friend of the Court" defending the monument and the Cross. Their European counterpart, the European Center for Law and Justice, is involved in the defense of crucifixes in public schools as the new secular religious cleansers have sought to remove any vestige of the Christian history of Europe.  As usual, the ACLJ's summary of the 9th Circuit opinion is the clearest available and I commend it to our readers. You can find it here: http://www.aclj.org/media/pdf/ACLJ_MtSoledadOpinionSummary_20100105.pdf

The ACLJ called the 9th Circuits opinion a "Faulty Ruling." I agree. However, it is much worse than that. It is one more example of a judicial oligarchy at work and a threat to religious freedom. 

---


Pope Francis: end world hunger through 'Prayer and Action'


Copyright 2016 - Distributed by THE CALIFORNIA NETWORK

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for SEPTEMBER 2016
Universal:
Centrality of the Human Person: That each may contribute to the common good and to the building of a society that places the human person at the center.
Evangelization: Mission to Evangelize: That by participating in the Sacraments and meditating on Scripture, Christians may become more aware of their mission to evangelize.



Comments


More Politics & Policy

SMART MOVE: Donald Trump appoints 33 Catholic leaders to advise him on policy matters Watch

Image of

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Donald Trump has named a list of 33 Catholics to a Catholic Advisory Group to offer him ongoing policy recommendations on matters of concern to Catholics and other Christians. Included on the list is Deacon Keith Fournier, the Editor in Chief of Catholic Online. LOS ... continue reading


Donald Trump commits to fight abortion! Letter sent to Pro-Life leaders Watch

Image of Donald Trump has described his position as

By Catholic Online

Donald Trump has issued a statement to pro-life leaders explaining his plans to protect and preserve the lives of our most vulnerable citizens. As leaders in this fight, we would like to share his words with you in our community. Please keep the unborn in mind ... continue reading


What Wells Fargo did to you, how Senator Warren is defending you, and why the Law Code of Hammurabi is better than our pathetic system of justice today Watch

Image of Elizabeth Warren skewered Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf during a Senate inquiry over the massive fraud perpetrated by the company.

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Senator Elizabeth Warren tore into Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf, who claims he is "accountable" for a massive scam that impacted millions of the bank's customers. However, Stumpf has not resigned, returned any money, or faced criminal prosecution. LOS ANGELES, CA ... continue reading


Why did George H.W. Bush say he is voting for Clinton? Because he's part of the globalist establishment, that's why Watch

Image of Is George H.W. Bush voting for Clinton? According to Kennedy-Townsend, yes.

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

George Herbert Walker Bush is a Clinton lover. It doesn't matter that Bill Clinton trashed him in the polls in 1991, his vote is going to Hillary Clinton. The reason behind the surprising endorsement is simple: globalism. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) ... continue reading


Catholics have the power to shape America's political future Watch

Image of Catholics may very well decide who the next president will be, and more.

By Marshall Connolly, (California Network)

Archbishop Chaput isn't too excited about the upcoming presidential election. In an interview with CNA, the Archbishop expressed deep disappointment at the quality of the candidates on offer. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - Archbishop Chaput has seen plenty of ... continue reading


This one clever turn of phrase has everyone questioning Hillary Clinton's medical report Watch

Image of No other person running for office in the primaries of general election has coughing fits, dizziness spells, seizures or faints. No other person travels with a team of doctors.

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton both released medical reports yesterday. According to the reports, both candidates are healthy and fit for office. But there's quite a catch in Clinton's report. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - Hillary Clinton's doctor released a ... continue reading


Liberals hate everyone different: Hillary Clinton calls you a deplorable, are prison camps next? Watch

Image of What will Hillary Clinton do with all those deplorables?

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Hillary Clinton regrets the backlash she's received after declaring half of all Trump's supporters to be "deplorables." The episode demonstrates that even she is prone to gaffes, something she has criticized Donald Trump for previously. LOS ANGELES, CA (California ... continue reading


Hillary Clinton's fatal mistake - why lying she has pneumonia will cost her presidency Watch

Image of Is she choking from pneumonia? Or on her lies?

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Hillary Clinton has painted herself into a corner, claiming that she has pneumonia. Now she must either get well, or face the public over questions of her health. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - At first it was nothing but a conspiracy theory. Hillary Clinton ... continue reading


Clinton passes out and loses shoe at 9/11 memorial ceremony Watch

Image of Hillary Clinton faints at 9/11 memorial in New York.

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Hillary Clinton's press team reported the Democratic nominee felt faint at the 9/11 ceremony due to "overheating" but what is really going on? LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Footage of Clinton leaning back against a stone pillar before collapsing entirely was ... continue reading


Will the Hispanic population decide next US President? Watch

Image of Will the Latino vote decide the next President of the United States?

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Who will decide the next US President? LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - According to the Pew Research Center, the United States' Hispanic population reached 57 million in 2015.Since then, the Hispanic birth rate has fallen yet Latinos are still 54 percent of the ... continue reading


All Politics & Policy News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Subscribe to Catholic OnlineYouTube Channel

Daily Readings

Reading 1, Job 1:6-22
6 One day when the sons of God came to attend on Yahweh, among them came ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 17:1, 2-3, 6-7
1 [Prayer Of David] Listen, Yahweh, to an upright cause, pay attention to ... Read More

Gospel, Luke 9:46-50
46 An argument started between them about which of them was the ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for September 26th, 2016 Image

Sts. Cosmas & Damian
September 26: Sts. Cosmas and Damian were brothers, born in ... Read More