Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Deacon Keith Fournier

9/20/2008 (8 years ago)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

Doug Kmiec asks the wrong question. The proper question is not "can" but "should". The word "can" addresses the issue of capacity and ability. "Should" examines the morality of that choice, what is our duty?

Doug Kmiec's book and support for Senator Barrack Obama has caused strong reactions in the Catholic and broader Christian community. His new book is likely to fan the fires.

Doug Kmiec's book and support for Senator Barrack Obama has caused strong reactions in the Catholic and broader Christian community. His new book is likely to fan the fires.

Highlights

By Deacon Keith Fournier

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

9/20/2008 (8 years ago)

Published in Politics & Policy


CHESAPEAKE, Va. (Catholic Online) - On Wednesday I received a personal copy of my friend Doug Kmiec's latest book entitled "Can a Catholic Support Him?" The book is subtitled "Asking the Big Question about Barrack Obama". I appreciate being mentioned in his Acknowledgement of the book with these words "Deacon Keith Fournier's writing and editing of Catholic Online is courageous and wise". So, I write this review to be faithful, to a friendship I value, to the claim in the acknowledgment of this book and to the truth. Doug asks the wrong question. The proper question is not "can" but "should". The word "can" addresses the issue of capacity and ability. Any Catholic can exercise their right to vote in any manner in which they choose. The Church to which Doug and I both belong does not tell people how to vote, in the sense of which candidate to choose. "Should" on the other hand examines the morality of that choice given our obligation to exercise our freedom with reference to the truth.In short, what is our duty? Sadly, in his argumentation in this book, Doug confuses or conflates the two. It is on this that I completely disagree with Doug Kmiec and am compelled to make that disagreement widely known.

Our Catholic faith proclaims the existence of a profound body of Moral teaching, a subset of which is called "Catholic Social Teaching". At its foundation is the insistence that every human life has an inviolable dignity and must be protected against unjust aggression from conception, through every age and stage of life, up to and including natural death. This is not a single "issue" but a framework through which all moral considerations and the positive law itself must be viewed. Human rights, indeed freedom itself, are goods of the human person, not free floating concepts. They require human persons to both receive them and to exercise them. Catholic Moral teaching is also rooted in an affirmation of the existence of a Natural Law which is knowable by all men and women because it is written on the human heart. This is the basis of the very hierarchy of rights which Doug Kmiec has spent his career attempting to espouse and train others to serve. To the believer, this Natural law is understood to be a participation in the Divine Law and is further expounded upon by Revelation. However, its existence is an objective reality and does not require one to have any religious belief. It is also binding on all men and women. For example, it is always and everywhere wrong to take innocent human life and it is always and everywhere wrong to kill our neighbor (outside of a legitimate exercise of self defense). Ascribing to these truths does not require one to be a religious believer. In fact they form the very core of Western positive law and the Jurisprudence which it has birthed.

Voting, like any human action, involves an ordering toward an end. Doug attempts in this little book to explain the morality of human action but does so incorrectly and inadequately. I ask my readers to examine the section entitled the "Morality of Human Acts" in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (Par. 1749 -1761) and Doug Kmiec's short treatment on Page 135 of his little book. Better yet,read the Servant of God John Paul II's Encyclicals entitled "The Gospel of Life" and "the Splendor of Truth" and then consider Doug Kmiec's approach to analyzing the morality of a human act. Doug is at best misinformed, at worst, teetering on serious error. It is immoral to vote in a manner which fails to protect innocent human persons from being unjustly killed. This is what occurs in every procured abortion, human persons are killed. It is immoral to vote in a manner that fails to include all of the poor, including children in the first home of the whole human race (their mothers womb) within the obligation we owe to one another in solidarity. Doug and his candidate are right to emphasize that we are our brother's (and sister's) keeper, but wrong to then exclude an entire class of brothers and sisters, the unborn, from the protections of the positive law. Doug contends that the choice he promotes in this book is morally acceptable. He asserts that both major Party candidates for the Presidency are actually not Pro-Life and are in favor of the current approach to abortion. Therefore he maintains he can make what he argues is a prudential judgment as to which pro-abortion candidate he supports. He even tries to borrow the excellent refutation of the analysis he offers, the recent letters of Archbishop Charles Chaput and Francis Cardinal George, to try to support his claim. This is sophistry.

Doug maintains that Senator McCain's position in favor of the overturning of Roe v Wade is simply a "Federalist position" and not a truly Pro-life stance. He argues (contrary to his own past claims) that the reversal of Roe v Wade will not really affect the state of the current law protecting abortion throughout all nine months of pregnancy as a "right". He confuses position with application. John McCain's quick response to Pastor Rick Warren's question on when human rights attach to human persons ("at conception"), as well as his pro-life record, demonstrate that his position is Pro-life. He recognizes that the neighbor in the womb is a human person. Yet, he is a Federalist and believes that the decision to outlaw the killing should be returned to the States, that is application. I favor a Constitutional Amendment protecting the inalienable Right to Life and recognizing the personhood of our first neighbor.I am an abortion abolitionist. However, as an officer of the Court like Doug, I know that the reversal of Roe opens up the field to securing protection of the children and will at least slow the shedding of innocent blood while we work on outlawing the act. I think he does as well but has backed himself into a corner.Doug's candidate promises to sign the "Freedom of Choice Act" as soon as he is sworn in to office. This will ensure the continued failure to recognize the child's right to life. The best his candidate has to offer is a comment that abortion is a "moral issue". His responses at the Saddleback forum on this issue were abysmal. As to the so called "changes" in the Democratic platform and his candidate's comments on the need to decrease the number of abortions, it is meaningless in light of his stated position. Doug and I used to agree that Senator McCain was wrong on his support of stem cell research. After all, every so called "extraction" of stem cells from a human embryo takes a human life. But now it appears that Senator McCain is beginning to recognize this and is moving closer to consistency. His candidate is not.

Finally, throughout this little book Doug vacillates between acknowledging the existence of objective moral truths which should govern human behavior and contending that someone could deny their existence, claim that such a denial is a "deeply held religious belief" and we should form our positive law to accommodate them under some misguided understanding of religious liberty and pluralism. Doug, what if a group insisted that children were not persons until they were able to walk? After all, they maintained, mobility is what makes them truly autonomous and therefore "persons". What if they also claimed that their position was a deeply held religious belief? Would you make the same argument? Well, the argument you now defend, that the child in the womb can be killed, without any protection against this objective violation of the Natural Law, is effectively the same argument. How can you take solace in the Senator from Illinois saying that he believes this type of killing is a "moral issue" but continuing to insist on calling it a "right"?

These two arguments are repeatedly presented in this little book as if repetition makes them more acceptable. It does not. Along with them we read Doug's story of being wrongly denied communion, his story of how he came to admire and support Barrack Obama and the other articles he has written in the past trying to justify his endorsement. I refuse to join those who personally attack Doug or question the sincerity of his Catholic faith. I do however vehemently disagree with him. I just found out that he will soon speak all over the Country trying to persuade other Catholics and other Christians to his position. I know that Catholics can be wrong; witness Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senator Joe Biden as only two recent examples. However, I really did not expect Doug Kmiec to join with them in incorrectly stating the position of our Church. Doug and I became friends partly through conversations over policy issues. He knows I could never be accused of being what he now rejects as a "Religious Faith Partisan" (RFP's). Like him, I might be considered a "Reagan Democrat", at least in the sense that I left the Democratic Party when it abandoned children in the womb and I voted for Ronald Reagan. For me, the last great authentic Democratic candidate was Governor Bob Casey, a truly Pro-life, Pro-freedom, Pro- Marriage and family, Pro-Poor and Pro-Peace candidate. His courageous "Compact for Care", had it been adopted by the Democratic Party, would have changed the history of that Party and of our Nation.I am a Catholic who believes in Catholic Social teaching. I maintain that the principles it offers, if applied, would bring about an authentically just society. The problem is that many Catholics do not know the Social teaching of their Church or have wrongly allowed "experts" on the "left" or the "right" to interpret what it is for them. Sadly, Doug has now joined them in this book, offering another incorrect and incomplete presentation of Catholic Social teaching.

My efforts to apply Catholic Social teaching to my own exercise of political participation have placed me, at times, outside of the realm of acceptability in both major political parties. They have elicited negative reactions from the so called "right", the so called "left" and many others in between. For example, my opposition to capital punishment has not found an ear in the leadership of either major political party in the US. My opposition to the initial foray into Iraq as having been unjustified under any interpretation of the so called "just war theory", placed me in opposition to "neo-cons" on the "right" and "left". It even placed me on the other side of this issue from Doug Kmiec, at least initially. I have expressed concerns over a market economy which places profits over people, families and the common good, noting that it can devolve into economism or what the late Servant of God John Paul II rightly called "savage capitalism". This position has evoked some of the most rancorous responses. However, the recent events on Wall Street and the domino effects in the global markets have simply proven that the danger not only exists but threatens true freedom.

I have opposed what is sometimes called "libertarianism" in American politics, contending it is antithetical to Catholic social thought. I understand there are types of "libertarianism" which have grown up in the American political climate which would cause some proponents to take exception to this claim. However, the two theories begin with two entirely different reference points in their "anthropology" (understanding of the nature of the person) and their vision of freedom. Libertarianism is individualist and atomistic in its definition of 'freedom", viewing government as some kind of necessary evil and basing social relationships on a kind of Hobbesian contract. Catholic social thought positions freedom within a vision of the human person as naturally (and supernaturally) created (and recreated in Christ) for communion. It asserts that governing is a part of our relational identity. Truly good governance begins with the smallest governance, the family and should give priority to the principle of subsidiarity. We were made for one another and we find our human fulfillment only in giving ourselves to the other. Then there is that other vital principle, a principle of social charity called solidarity, which insists that we are "our brothers (and sisters) keeper".

Doug and I shared a common frustration with an approach in some circles to equate "Republican" or "Conservative" with Catholic. He had read my efforts to remind people that "Catholic is the noun". I was intrigued by his efforts to propose ideas more in keeping with Catholic social thought. However, I never expected he would fail to oppose another unjust war, the war on the womb. That is the effect of his endorsement. His candidate is an abortion Hawk. Medical science has confirmed what our conscience has told us all along, the child in the womb is one of us, a human person and, our neighbor. We should not allow the continued prosecution of this unjust war on children in the womb. In his well written introduction to this book Martin Sheen credits Mother Teresa and Dorothy Day's influence on his own Pro-Life and Pro-Peace position. Yet, both opposed abortion without any hint of compromise.I would welcome an opportunity to meet Martin Sheen. He seems to be one of the last consistent liberals.

It was Mother Teresa, whose anniversary we recently commemorated, who said it so clearly: "America needs no words from me to see how your decision in Roe v. Wade has deformed a great nation. The so-called right to abortion has pitted mothers against their children and women against men. It has sown violence and discord at the heart of the most intimate human relationships. It has aggravated the derogation of the father's role in an increasingly fatherless society. It has portrayed the greatest of gifts -- a child -- as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters. And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign."

---


Pope Francis: end world hunger through 'Prayer and Action'


Copyright 2016 - Distributed by THE CALIFORNIA NETWORK

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for SEPTEMBER 2016
Universal:
Centrality of the Human Person: That each may contribute to the common good and to the building of a society that places the human person at the center.
Evangelization: Mission to Evangelize: That by participating in the Sacraments and meditating on Scripture, Christians may become more aware of their mission to evangelize.



Comments


More Politics & Policy

A Catholic guide to Clinton and Trump - which candidate is closer to the Church in their stated positions? Watch

Image of With 20 percent of the population, Catholics represent a major voting bloc in the United States.

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Tonight Hillary Clinton will debate against Donald Trump in the first of three presidential debates. There are plenty of debate previews to read, but none are tailored for Catholics. What should Catholics look for in tonight's debate? LOS ANGELES, CA (California ... continue reading


SMART MOVE: Donald Trump appoints 33 Catholic leaders to advise him on policy matters Watch

Image of

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Donald Trump has named a list of 33 Catholics to a Catholic Advisory Group to offer him ongoing policy recommendations on matters of concern to Catholics and other Christians. Included on the list is Deacon Keith Fournier, the Editor in Chief of Catholic Online. LOS ... continue reading


Donald Trump commits to fight abortion! Letter sent to Pro-Life leaders Watch

Image of Donald Trump has described his position as

By Catholic Online

Donald Trump has issued a statement to pro-life leaders explaining his plans to protect and preserve the lives of our most vulnerable citizens. As leaders in this fight, we would like to share his words with you in our community. Please keep the unborn in mind ... continue reading


What Wells Fargo did to you, how Senator Warren is defending you, and why the Law Code of Hammurabi is better than our pathetic system of justice today Watch

Image of Elizabeth Warren skewered Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf during a Senate inquiry over the massive fraud perpetrated by the company.

By Marshall Connolly (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Senator Elizabeth Warren tore into Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf, who claims he is "accountable" for a massive scam that impacted millions of the bank's customers. However, Stumpf has not resigned, returned any money, or faced criminal prosecution. LOS ANGELES, CA ... continue reading


Why did George H.W. Bush say he is voting for Clinton? Because he's part of the globalist establishment, that's why Watch

Image of Is George H.W. Bush voting for Clinton? According to Kennedy-Townsend, yes.

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

George Herbert Walker Bush is a Clinton lover. It doesn't matter that Bill Clinton trashed him in the polls in 1991, his vote is going to Hillary Clinton. The reason behind the surprising endorsement is simple: globalism. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) ... continue reading


Catholics have the power to shape America's political future Watch

Image of Catholics may very well decide who the next president will be, and more.

By Marshall Connolly, (California Network)

Archbishop Chaput isn't too excited about the upcoming presidential election. In an interview with CNA, the Archbishop expressed deep disappointment at the quality of the candidates on offer. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - Archbishop Chaput has seen plenty of ... continue reading


This one clever turn of phrase has everyone questioning Hillary Clinton's medical report Watch

Image of No other person running for office in the primaries of general election has coughing fits, dizziness spells, seizures or faints. No other person travels with a team of doctors.

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton both released medical reports yesterday. According to the reports, both candidates are healthy and fit for office. But there's quite a catch in Clinton's report. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - Hillary Clinton's doctor released a ... continue reading


Liberals hate everyone different: Hillary Clinton calls you a deplorable, are prison camps next? Watch

Image of What will Hillary Clinton do with all those deplorables?

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Hillary Clinton regrets the backlash she's received after declaring half of all Trump's supporters to be "deplorables." The episode demonstrates that even she is prone to gaffes, something she has criticized Donald Trump for previously. LOS ANGELES, CA (California ... continue reading


Hillary Clinton's fatal mistake - why lying she has pneumonia will cost her presidency Watch

Image of Is she choking from pneumonia? Or on her lies?

By David Drudge (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Hillary Clinton has painted herself into a corner, claiming that she has pneumonia. Now she must either get well, or face the public over questions of her health. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - At first it was nothing but a conspiracy theory. Hillary Clinton ... continue reading


Clinton passes out and loses shoe at 9/11 memorial ceremony Watch

Image of Hillary Clinton faints at 9/11 memorial in New York.

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Hillary Clinton's press team reported the Democratic nominee felt faint at the 9/11 ceremony due to "overheating" but what is really going on? LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Footage of Clinton leaning back against a stone pillar before collapsing entirely was ... continue reading


All Politics & Policy News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Subscribe to Catholic OnlineYouTube Channel

Daily Readings

Reading 1, Job 1:6-22
6 One day when the sons of God came to attend on Yahweh, among them came ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 17:1, 2-3, 6-7
1 [Prayer Of David] Listen, Yahweh, to an upright cause, pay attention to ... Read More

Gospel, Luke 9:46-50
46 An argument started between them about which of them was the ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for September 26th, 2016 Image

Sts. Cosmas & Damian
September 26: Sts. Cosmas and Damian were brothers, born in ... Read More