Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Andrew M. Greenwell, Esq.

4/21/2013 (3 years ago)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

In the land of ideology, subjective preferences--tastes--what Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes called 'can't helps'--and nothing else--govern the good, which means nothing governs the good.

To understand marriage, we have to develop, if we don't already have such a sense, a sense of social realism.  If we have a well-developed sense of social realism, we can see through the ideologies that surround gay "marriage," in particular the homosexualist ideology which is wildly based upon unreality. 

Highlights

By Andrew M. Greenwell, Esq.

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

4/21/2013 (3 years ago)

Published in Marriage & Family

Keywords: homosexual marriage, gay marriage, social realism, marriage, natural institution, Andrew M. Greenwell


CORPUS CHRISTI, TX (Catholic Online) - Homosexual "Marriage" is built upon unreality.  At its most basic, any advocacy of gay "marriage" is built upon an anti-realist view of society.  It is not based upon what is, but is based entirely upon the advocate's idea of what should be.  What is has no bearing on what should be, on what is good. 

For the anti-realist, ontology--the study of being, of what is, of something's nature or essence--has nothing to do with morality--the study of what is good.  When our concept of the good is cut off from the concept of reality, we walk away from realism and into the land of ideology. 

In the land of ideology, subjective preferences--tastes--what Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes called "can't helps"--and nothing else--govern the good, which means nothing governs the good. 

As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, who rejected any notion of natural law, tersely put it, moral truths become "more or less arbitrary . . . . Do you like sugar in your coffee or don't you?  . . . So as to truth."  "Our tastes," Holmes pontificated ex cathedra under whose authority I can only imagine, "are finalities."  This is the opposite of realism.  This is idealism.  Moral values are based upon our ideas, not reality.

Physical realism takes things as they are, as real.  It is the common sense by which we lead our lives.  Very few of us jump off the ledge of the Grand Canyon--at least without a parachute, or bungee cord, or some other gravity-deflecting device--because we are aware of that ineluctable reality of the law of gravity.  That is realism.

In his famous biography of Dr. Samuel Johnson, Boswell tells the story of how Dr. Johnson refuted the theories of subjective idealism of George Berkely which denied the reality of material world.  "I refute it thus!" Dr. Johnson exclaimed, as he kicked a rock.

When it comes to homosexual "marriage," we have to refute it by kicking a rock, so to speak.  That is to say, we can only refute homosexual "marriage" if we stay close to reality, to what is.  This is the case because marriage is a natural community, not one we make ourselves.  It is not at all like the question of whether we like sugar in our coffee or not.

To be sure, in the case of marriage, we are not dealing with a physical matter such as a rock.  Rather, we are dealing with a moral institution, a social institution, one founded upon a particular human community.  In fact, marriage is the most basic of social communities from which all others are derived.  But though it is a moral and social institution, marriage remains a natural institution, a natural community, and so is based on natural reality, on what is.

Before any human law steps in to govern marriage, the natural, social institution of marriage is already there.  It existed before human law.  Indeed, it existed even before the Church, and so the Church does nothing other than "sacramentalize" or perfect the natural institution which pre-existed her existence. 

The Church, like the State, has no authority to change the fundamental aspects of marriage because it is based upon the reality that existed before Church and State existed.  Marriage is a primordial institution.  That's why the defense of marriage has nothing to do with religion or with faith.  It is not a matter of religious faith, but a matter of being sane.

Marriage is not based upon faith, which Scriptures define as the reality of what is hoped for, the evidence of things not seen (Heb. 11:1).  No.  Rather, marriage has everything to do with natural reality, what is before us, what is seen.  That's why, like Dr. Johnson's rock, it can be kicked.

Marriage existed before the Lord walked in Palestine and wiped clean the slate of the legal accretions allowed to blight the original, primordial meaning of marriage and which tolerated divorce because of the Jews' hardness of heart.  "But from the beginning of creation, God made the male and female," Jesus said.  "For this cause, a man shall leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife, and the two shall be one flesh. . . . What therefore God has joined together, let not man put asunder."  (Mark 10:6-9; Matt 19:7-9)

Marriage has been there from the beginning.  It is part of created reality, of what is, a place where reason reigns.  It is not part of supernatural reality, where faith comes into play.

If marriage existed before Jesus Christ walked on this earth in the third century A.D., it certainly existed before the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, ordained and established our federal government in 1787 which was ratified by the requisite number of states in 1788. 

Indeed, marriage existed before the Greeks ever came up with the idea of democracy, and so it precedes democracy, which means even the people--be they the majority--have no say in the matter.  You cannot make the sun into the moon by a majority vote because the sun is the sun and the moon the moon, and that that is so is part of what is.

The institution of marriage preceded any positive human law on marriage, and it would exist, though perhaps not flourish as well, without human law that conforms to its fundamental order.  Similarly, it would exist, though perhaps not flourish as well, under human law that does not conform to its fundamental order, which is the regime under which marriage currently operates.  Human law cannot change it: it can only help it or hinder it.

Since marriage is a natural community that precedes the State, marriage is a matter of natural right.  It is a natural and intrinsic good.  It is not what is called an instrumental good.  It needs no justification other that itself: marriage justifies itself as good without reference to a greater good.  It is a good simpliciter.

Marriage is not good because it is useful, though it also may be that, and there are certainly social benefits to the common good derived from flourishing marriages, just like there are certainly social costs that arise from marriages that fail. 

Marriage is good because it is natural.  It is part of the created order, of what is.  We therefore have a natural right to marriage.  Being a natural right, the right to marriage is a human right, and as a result no human law can proscribe marriage. 

But all this is true only if marriage is not a matter of "taste," if marriage is something other than whether I like sugar in my coffee or not, if marriage is something akin to a rock.

Most of us would not need to kick a rock to believe that a rock is a rock.  To that degree, most of us are realists. 

But realism must not confine itself to the physical world.  There is also realism in the moral world, in social reality.  There are natural moral and social realities, such as marriage, that have "rock-like" qualities. 

To understand marriage, we therefore have to develop, if we don't already have such a sense, a sense of social realism.  If we have a well-developed sense of social realism, we can see through the ideologies that surround gay "marriage," in particular the homosexualist ideology which is wildly based upon unreality. 

The unreality of the homosexual "marriage" advocate is based upon the obviously false assumption that sexual activity between two men (or between two women) is morally equivalent to conjugal or sexual activity between one man and one woman (who are mutually complementary), and which is naturally ordered to, and open toward, the procreation and education of children, even if all these relationships place within the context of a mutual life-long and comprehensive commitment.

The first two same-sex commitments, whatever they are called, are not marriage, and can never be marriage.  It is metaphysically impossible--so long as one is anchored in reality--that the sexual activity between two men or between two women is naturally ordered to, and open toward, the procreation and education of children.

Only the last--a complementary union of one man and one woman that is naturally ordered to, and open toward, the procreation and education of children and which takes place within the context of a mutual life-long and comprehensive commitment--is marriage. 

If one does not see the difference between the same sex "marriage" and the real thing, it is because one is no longer a moral or social realist.  When one is not a moral or social realist, one begins to live what is not as if it were what is.  Another way of saying this is that one begins to say "evil be thou my good," and this takes one into the realms of privation, into the regions of phantasmagorical but not real "good," to a land of unreality, where Paradise is lost.

To be a social realist, as Eduardo J. Echeverria defines it in his book Dialogue of Love, "means you hold that . . . natural communities such as marriage and family, are real social wholes, real in themselves, having their own nature or essence and ends, given a normative creation order."

Because social realism means that natural communities such as marriage are a real social realities, with their own nature or essence, and their own ends, all of which are informed through a normative order in created existence, the social realist will recognize, like Dr. Johnson recognized about the rock, that such natural communities "are not just 'fictitious entities,' as individualism would have it, constructed by either a contract between self-contained individuals."

As J. Richard Percy recently wrote: "Marriage is a rock for humanity, and a safe haven for children, precisely because it hinges upon the Creator, not upon ideological passions, nor upon decisions of state." 

The rock that is marriage is not a matter of taste, a matter of "can't helps," a matter of whether one likes sugar with one's coffee.  A social realist, well-planted in reality, in what is, will see this intuitively, implicitly. 

Marriage is, and can only be, a complementary union of one man and one woman that is naturally ordered to, and open toward, the procreation and education of children and which takes place within the context of a mutual life-long and comprehensive commitment.  That's just the way it is, and defining it in any other way is trying to make real something that is not.

-----

Andrew M. Greenwell is an attorney licensed to practice law in Texas, practicing in Corpus Christi, Texas.  He is married with three children.  He maintains a blog entirely devoted to the natural law called Lex Christianorum.  You can contact Andrew at agreenwell@harris-greenwell.com.

---


Pope Francis: end world hunger through 'Prayer and Action'


Copyright 2016 - Distributed by THE CALIFORNIA NETWORK

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for May 2016
Universal:
Respect for Women: That in every country of the world, women may be honored and respected and that their essential contribution to society may be highly esteemed.
Evangelization: Holy Rosary: That families, communities, and groups may pray the Holy Rosary for evangelization and peace.



Comments


More Marriage & Family

Spark of Life: Scientists discover moment souls enter eggs at the time of conception Watch

Image of Researchers discovered a spark at the moment human eggs are fertilized (Angels/Fanpop).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

In a miraculous, literally life-changing discovery, scientists have discovered the moment a soul enters a fertilized egg. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Catholics have long believed life begins at the moment of conception, which is why in vitro fertilization and ... continue reading


Amazing Christ sighting: Image reveals Jesus on the cross Watch

Image of Woman discovers Christ on cross during baby shower (Aley Meyer).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Mother-to-be Aley Meyer was so excited to have a child, she didn't notice the image of Christ until someone else pointed it out during her baby shower. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - "She was like, 'do you see this?' And I was like, 'see what?' And she pointed to ... continue reading


Top 10 hilarious dog memes Watch

Image of Dogs are man's best friend - and sometimes they're downright hilarious!

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

The internet may be full of cat videos but let's face it: Dogs are more expressive, more adorable and much more entertaining! LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Calling all dog people! Have you ever wondered what your dog would say if it could speak people?Maybe your ... continue reading


5 things Catholics should NEVER do in their marriage Watch

Image of God wants the best for our relationships, so keep these tips in mind (John Yoder).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

If you've been married long enough to pass the honeymoon phase, you know maintaining a relationship can be hard - especially when you feel you aren't being heard or if you've begun to communicate through a series of screaming matches. So how can you keep calm and enjoy ... continue reading


'The embryo has an amazing ability to correct itself:' Mothers may have been killing perfectly healthy babies Watch

Image of New study indicates false positives for fetal abnormalities.

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

For years pregnant mothers were tested and told their unborn children contained abnormal cells, indicating a higher possibility of developmental disorders such as Down's syndrome.Many of these mothers choose to abort for a variety of reasons. Unfortunately for these ... continue reading


'It's heartbreaking': Pet cat shot 30 times - AND SURVIVED Watch

Image of Puss-Puss miraculously survived shotgun wounds (PA).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

When cat-owner Doug Taw heard a few gunshots in his Ardleigh, Essex neighborhood, he thought nothing of it. He continued with his regular routine until he realized his 3-year-old cat, Puss-Puss, didn't come home that night. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - According ... continue reading


Once upon a time, pro-life meant being a Democrat Watch

Image of To be pro-life was not always to be Republican (CNA).

By Mary Rezac (CNA)

"(W)hen it comes to issues like abortion, amnesty, and acid, I'm about as liberal as your grandmother. I don't like the Supreme Court decision on abortion. I think it went too far." Washington D.C.  (CNA) - So said then-Senator Joe Biden <a ... continue reading


So incest is okay now? This is the most disgusting thing you'll read all day. Watch

Image of Kim West, 52 and her biological son, Ben Ford, 32, have gone into hiding to avoid jail. The pair hope to have a baby together.

By Marshall Connolly, (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

"I'm in love with my son, and I want to have his baby." This comes from a 51 year old woman who is reportedly in love with her 32 year old son, and intends to get pregnant by him. LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) - Over thirty years ago, a young Kim West gave her ... continue reading


'We definitely believe in miracles': Pregnant woman waived cancer treatment to protect her unborn son Watch

Image of Kim Vaillancourt struggled with cancer through her pregnancy and gave birth to a healthy baby boy (GoFundMe).

By Kenya Sinclair (CALIFORNIA NETWORK)

Kim Vaillancourt was five months pregnant when she, her husband Phil and their two children welcomed three sisters into their family. Two days later, the family was set to celebrate Christmas but instead of a family meal and presents, Kim was diagnosed with brain ... continue reading


What does Pope Francis have to say about preparation for marriage? Watch

Image of

By Catholic News Agency

Among the less-noticed passages of Pope Francis' new exhortation was a lengthy section on marriage preparation, a subject that the pontiff has repeatedly spoken on, calling for additional focus at the diocesan and parish levels. Vatican City, (CNA/EWTN News) - ... continue reading


All Marriage & Family News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Subscribe to Catholic OnlineYouTube Channel

the FEED
by Catholic Online

Daily Readings

Reading 1, First Corinthians 15:1-8
1 I want to make quite clear to you, brothers, what the message of the ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 19:2-3, 4-5
2 day discourses of it to day, night to night hands on the ... Read More

Gospel, John 14:6-14
6 Jesus said: I am the Way; I am Truth and Life. No one can come to the ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for May 3rd, 2016 Image

St. James the Lesser
May 3: St. James the Less, the author of the first ... Read More