Editorial: Stephen Hawking is Wrong. Church is a Defender of Life, Science and the Person

6/10/2010

(Page 2 of 2)

such research may also be made available in areas of the world that are poor and afflicted by disease, so that those who are most in need will receive humanitarian assistance".

Following the release of the instruction the Press was filled with reports concerning its content. A few accurately described it and affirmed its significance. Others passed on the caricatures of the Catholic Church such as what Hawkings said to Sawyer in this ABC interview. When I read professor Hawkings comments I felt compelled to again encourage all Catholics to read this teaching document. It is a "doctrinal" statement of the ordinary magisterium (teaching office) and must be given the full assent of our intellect and will. However, it was addressed not only to Catholics, other Christians or even just people of faith, it is addressed to "all who seek the truth". It presents the truth by drawing upon the "light both of reason and faith and seeks to set forth an integral vision of man and his vocation".

The Church does not discourage progress in biomedicine, it encourages it. However, the human person is never an "it" - but an "I" - some-one who must never be treated as an object. "The body of a human being, from the very first stages of its existence, can never be reduced merely to a group of cells. The embryonic human body develops progressively according to a well defined program with its proper finality, as is apparent in the birth of every baby."

The insistence upon this framework for evaluating biomedicine is revealed in the Natural Law; the fundamental human right to life and the dignity of human persons. This right is knowable by and binding upon all men and women and is not simply a "religious" construct. Footnote 7 within the document cites Pope Benedict XVI's presentation to the United Nations in April of 2008 which summarizes this point well:

"Human rights.in particular the right to life of every human being "are based on the natural law inscribed on human hearts and present in different cultures and civilizations. Removing human rights from this context would mean restricting their range and yielding to a relativistic conception, according to which the meaning and interpretation of rights could vary and their universality would be denied in the name of different cultural, political, social and even religious outlooks. This great variety of viewpoints must not be allowed to obscure the fact that not only rights are universal, but so too is the human person, the subject of those rights"

I am deeply grateful for the Catholic Church, Defender of Life and Promoter of Science at the Service of the Person. What is needed are well formed Catholics who can learn how to defend the truth presented by the Church to an age which has lost its common sense, reason and moral compass. We need to read what our Church teaches and be ready to contend for the culture.

- - -

Pope Benedict XVI's Prayer Intentions for January 2013
General Intention: The Faith of Christians. That in this Year of Faith Christians may deepen their knowledge of the mystery of Christ and witness joyfully to the gift of faith in him.
Missionary Intention: Middle Eastern Christians. That the Christian communities of the Middle East, often discriminated against, may receive from the Holy Spirit the strength of fidelity and perseverance.

Keywords:

NEWSLETTERS »

Previous Page 1 | 2

Rate This Article

Was this helpful to you? Very Helpful Somewhat Helpful Not Helpful at All

Would you be interested in more articles like this? Yes, I am Interested No, I am not Interested

Rate Article

1 - 10 of 51 Comments

Robert T. Bobar
1 year ago
Did Stephen Hawking Kill The Big Bang Theory?

This is a serious scientific discussion and not an emotional discussion about atheism vs theism . So please try to control yourselves, just remember I did not bring God into this, Stephen Hawking did. However I will continue on his theme as a device in making some real discovery about the big bang singularity.

For the public record ( since it is in the public ) for ALL to see, In The Discovery Channel's The First Episode of Curiosity titled "Did God Create The Universe" :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcRA-GuzBhI

Stephen Hawking makes the argument that since time itself didn't exist therefore God would have no time to create the universe in. He said it's from science :) But this introduces a subtle paradox that can best be shown using this challenging statement:

"If God had no time to create then also The Big Bang had no time to Bang, what is good for the goose is often also good for the gander as well. Give Up."

Yet we know the universe did not always exist because stars keep time like candles by using up their fuel and dying. It is even more mind boggling to realize that time itself cannot possibly be infinite since time would never be able to tic down to the present time from an infinite past.

About about in circles we go !!!

Your mission should you choice to accept it, is to find a solution to this paradox.

Robert T. Bobar: I can be reached at rbobar@yahoo.com

I am leaving this here in the hope that someone can help me bring this & questions science to The Pope's attention.
Anthony
2 years ago
The efforts of the "faith"ful to rebut any skepticism which impinges on their dependence on this grand fairy tale is touching (although it speaks rather feebly for their capacity to use their God-given capacity for reason in finding their way in life) but the array of logical flaws in what they say is more than the holes in a fishnet.

One example: Einstein's quote about science without religion is lame". and the related confusion in the article between religion and morality. Morality is well rooted in all religions, but it can exist separately without religion, as many enlightened atheists show.

Science without religion is our most powerful tool in exploring and exploiting the universe, as well as damaging it. Morality is a respect for human values, ones which lead to the most human happiness. The two are separate magisteria. Religion is a child of human fears and ignorance, not moral enlightenment. Religions with a fine morality such as Catholicism are called religions, those without are called cults. Their psychological engine is much the same, however: human vulnerability in need of rescue from a great power and authority, called Dad when we are young.

Hawking is quite right to reject religious faith as irrelevant to conquering the material universe. It is relevant only to conquering human weakness, and as a crutch, it should be replaced in the end with true health of the spirit, ie love for one's fellows and all of existence, which is the real miracle.

Those who use silly logic such as "something must have caused the Universe" need to ask themselves that if the answer is God, then who or what caused God?
Bill
2 years ago
Robert, Bill Donohue does a great job defending the Catholic Church from its many detractors. You criticize him for using 5th grade definitions yet you make a wildly unsupported accusation that the Church is hostel (hostile) during this neoconservative movement. Please explain what that means???? Also, I am unaware that Bill Donohue occupies a position of authority within the Catholic Church!! His organization is not funded by the Church. I suggest that Bill Donohue and the Catholic League provide a needed bromide against biased and unfounded attacks.
Michael Evers
2 years ago
MICHAEL ALBANO: You may well be right about the need for the Holy Spirit's intervention. But don't you think God speaks through the mouths of humans like ourselves -- however unworthy we might be -- and however unaware of it we might be of doing so?
Peterman
2 years ago
Were it not for Christianity, Hawking might well have been euthanized long ago. I'm just saying, think about it. He should stop attacking the very religious culture that says to the world that his life has merit no matter what his physical handicaps
GAMM
2 years ago
I always find it amusing when Christians quote Einstein as if he was a friend of religion and other superstitious beliefs. Anyone who had the slightest interest in Einstein would know that he was an atheist and had a great deal of disdain for all faiths.

The relationship between science and faith is given extra importance by misquoting famous historical figures such as Einstein who wrote in a letter during the last year before his death:
"the word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish."

"For me," he added, "the Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions."

These are hardly the words of a religious man; they are the words of an Atheist.
MICHAEL G. ALBANO
2 years ago
I HAVE THOUGHT VERY HARD ABOUT WHAT HAS BEEN SAID NOT SO MUCH ABOUT THE ARTICLE, BUT ABOUT THE COMMENTS. MANY GOOD POINTS, AND MANY BAD POINTS. I'VE NOTICED SOME PRIDE, ANGER, JEALOUSIES, ETC, TO ALL OF YOU WHO HAVE DEFENDED THE CHURCH AND IT'S HISTORY, GOD BLESS YOU. SOME OF YOU HAVE DONE SO WITH ELEGANCE AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ONCE AGAIN, GOD BLESS YOU! UNFORTUNATELY, NONE OF US, NO MATTER HOW WELL THE ARGUMENTS ARE PRESENTED, WILL BE ABLE TO CONVINCE DR. L, DUSTIN, KEVIN D., DAVID HUME, AND PHIL UNTIL THEY ARE TOUCHED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT. I HOPE AND PRAY THAT THE HOLY SPIRIT COMES TO YOU VERY SOON! THIS ARTICLE AND THE COMMENTS TELLS US WE MUST REMAIN EVER VIGILANT. WE MUST CONTINUE TO PAY THE RANSOM FOR THESE SOULS. THE RANSOM IS OUR PRAYERS FOR THEIR SALVATION.
KD
2 years ago
When Stephen Hawking was 21, a doctor told him he would not live to see 23. To be flirting with age 70 utterly defies science. May God give Mr Hawking the grace to believe.
FreddyG
2 years ago
Although I certainly admire Hawking for his mathematical and scientific insights, he is obviously only capable of using the scientific method to draw his conclusions. This works well for him in his profession, but it adds little to his insights into philosophy, religion, and the ability to evaluate the "deeper" questions man asks of himself and the universe. When it comes to arguments involving "first principles," Hawking is no more brilliant or insightful than the average man in the street. I think the words of Einstein reflect well on Hawking's thinking. He said, "Religion without science is blind. Science without religion is lame." I feel sorry for Dr. Hawking, realizing that he must ultimately regard his own fantastic work as - in the end - lame, and that his life has no ULTIMATE purpose or meaning. In other words Dr. Hawking, as impressive as your work has been (even when you have made mistakes), WHY BOTHER?????
Michael Evers
2 years ago
Dr. L,

For the sake of brevity:

"The truth shall set you free." -- Jesus of Nazareth

Academics have argued that this core belief explains why science arose in Christendom. That said, Christendom -- subject to human nature as it is -- certainly has a fair amount of apologizing to do in terms of not practicing what it preaches.

"It is only by knowing one's limits that a man becomes truly free."
-- Henry David Thoreau

Science, it seems to me, has the unfortunate habit of making claims that its data does not support. The Grand Theory of Evolution is a good example of this. To say that significant evidence affirms the theory of natural selection, and that this process appears to involve random events is one thing. Jumping from this claim to the claim that all events that occur in existence are fundamentally random in nature is really quite a jump. Ditto Drs L and Hawking's claims. The data they have at hand is just not sufficient to support these claims.

This raises the question of why scientists seem so frequently compelled to make such unsupportable claims: pride? ambition? faith?

Prev12 3 4 5 6 Next

Comments submitted must be civil, remain on-topic and not violate any laws including copyright. We reserve the right to delete any comments which are abusive, inappropriate or not constructive to the discussion.

Though we invite robust discussion, we reserve the right to not publish any comment which denigrates the human person, undermines marriage and the family, or advocates for positions which openly oppose the teaching of the Catholic Church.

This is a supervised forum and the Editors of Catholic Online retain the right to direct it.

We also reserve the right to block any commenter for repeated violations. Your email address is required to post, but it will not be published on the site.

We ask that you NOT post your comment more than once. Catholic Online is growing and our ability to review all comments sometimes results in a delay in their publication.

Name *

Email *

Comment *

Send me important information from Catholic Online and it's partners. See Sample

Post Comment