A Response to a Scientologist: The Truth Shall Make You Free
Story on forced abortions within Scientology drew a letter from the Sacramento Public Affairs office of Scientology. My response.
I have filed eight stories on Scientology since June, 2009. As we researched for these articles, the witnesses we found included former members, investigators, affidavits from litigation, etc. The amount of information available regarding false declarations, questionable practices, and suspicious relationships is enormous; its impact is global.
I do want to acknowledge the writer’s civility and courtesy, even though we disagree on the matter at hand.
He indicated that the story on forced abortions was based on fabricated lies brought forth by “a very few disgruntled members” who are using us (Catholic Online).
I have filed eight stories on Scientology since June, 2009. As we researched for these articles, the witnesses we found included former members, investigators, affidavits from litigation, etc. The amount of information available regarding false declarations, questionable practices, and suspicious relationships is enormous; its impact is global.
I knew of Scientology for many years and even remember thumbing through L. Ron Hubbard’s book, “Dianetics,” as a young man. For me, it made little sense. Obviously, for many this has not been the case as Scientology has grown into a worldwide organization in the past half-century with what they report to be 12 million followers.
This prominence and influence in people’s lives not only requires a serious inquiry but demands it, especially when individuals come forward with reports of abuse.
Let me quickly add, to address those who left comments that Catholic Online should look at abuses closer to home – we do and we have. We have reported about abuse within the Church and acknowledge that all groups, whether they are faith-based or not, must be accountable for any abuse of or by their members.
From the judicial finding of fraud arising out of the legal action in France to the serious concerns entered into the Parliamentary record by Senator Xenophon of Australia, there are many voices across the world right now calling for a serious examination of the organization called Scientology.
One major force of opposition facing Scientology – and probably the one that Mr. Klagenberg was referencing – does not come from without but from within. Former Scientologist and Oscar-winner Paul Haggis publicly resigned publicly criticizing the Church of Scientology, as have OTVIII Geir Isene and former high-ranking Sea Org executive Marty Rathbun.
Isene and Rathbun remain practitioners of Scientology, and their websites and forum are drawing many Scientologists who have been driven out of the official Church of Scientology by its abuses under the leadership of David Miscavige.
Former Scientologists have become involved in a leaderless Internet-based cadre called Anonymous. One of my contacts describes them as follows:
"Anonymous is a world-wide movement of university students and young Information Technology professionals, who have been joined by older and young generations, and are dedicated to engaging public action to end the Church of Scientology's suppression of free speech and its human rights abuses."
Anonymous has given those opposed to Scientology are stronger forum and additional technological as well as human resources. For example, as many as 11,000 "anons" have been a part of protests in 130+ cities in 30+ countries. 600 "anons" protested in London at the first on February 10, 2008, on the birthday of Lisa McPherson, whose death has become a symbol of Scientology abuse.
Group members, for the most part, do not know each other’s names; there is no central office, no hierarchy and no official spokesperson.
The Internet is the main “turf” for their conflict with Scientology. Beginning with cyber-pranks, some who identified with the group later became more aggressive in their attacks on Scientology websites.
Recently, Anonymous member Dmitriy Guzner was sentenced to a year and a day in prison and ordered to pay $37,500 in restitution to the Church of Scientology for his part in an attack on the Church's websites.
Guzner’s actions were reportedly a part of “Project Chanology”, a campaign to take down Scientology on the Internet. Critics of Scientology are not all sympathetic to the methods and motivation of this undertaking. This project was initiated after Scientology attempted to remove material from a Tom Cruise interview on the web.
Anonymous also organizes public demonstrations against Scientology at numerous sites around the world, encourages legal and political efforts against Scientology and provides online documentation concerning abuses within the organization. They are committed to discrediting as well as disrupting the work of Scientology.
Cardinal Marc Ouellet of Québec defended the right of the group to oppose Scientology last February. He received a letter from “Anonymous Quebec” documenting a number of issues after publicly declaring that ...
Rate This Article
1 - 10 of 30 Comments
Leave a Comment
More U.S. News
- US Supreme Court Accepts Religion Case: Will Legislative Prayer Survive Religious Censorship?
- Two Oklahoma men killed in tornadoes; Kansas, Iowa batten down for severe weather
- Supreme Court to decide if prayer before town meeting is permissible
- All survive terrifying plane 'belly landing' in Newark
- Nebraska Bishop: Gosnell clinic was 'reminiscent of Auschwitz'
- Why even if you lose, playing Powerball isn't such a bad bet after all
- Cheap cigarette outlets in U.S. may be funding terrorists
- Shocking report reveals 38 men, 33 women are raped each day in the military
- Father Frank Pavone: Houston Abortionist Killing Babies Born Alive
Featured News
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?
Most Popular
There's the problem! Americans are out of touch with scientific consensus on climate change Read More
Editorial: Is the Scandal Ridden Obama Administration Becoming a House of Cards? Read More
Sex In Uniform: Why the Increase in Sexual Assaults in the Military? Read More
Bill Donohue, Catholic League, Disclose Fight with the IRS, Demonstrate Courage Read More
Has the Internal Revenue Service become 'Domestic Terrorists'? Read More
Daily Readings
Reading 1, Sirach 2:1-11
My child, if you aspire to serve the Lord, prepare yourself for ... Read More
Psalm, Psalms 37:3-4, 18-19, 27-28, 39-40
Put your trust in Yahweh and do right, make your home in the ... Read More
Gospel, Mark 9:30-37
After leaving that place they made their way through Galilee; ... Read More
Saint of the Day
St. Eugene de Mazenod
May 21: Eugene de Mazenod was born on August 1, 1782, at Aix-en-Provence ... Read More
Latest Videos
'Beata viscera Mariae'- Byrd-polyphony (HD) View Video
Learning about Gregorian Chant~ Solesmes View Video
May 21 - Homily: We Are Not All One Flock View Video
May 21 - Homily: St. Magallanes, Mexican Martyrs View Video
Soldier of Love - 2 Pillars #32 View Video
Marketplace
The Grafic Life of Jesus the Christ
Over the years there have been a number of fine books on the life of ... Read More
Jerusalem Stone Confirmed In Christ, Promise Stone Read More




Print















Pat Broeker, athough I agree that bringing up the Inquisition doesn't prove anything, I think that commentor had a point, even though this point discredits that comment: that you can not judge a religion simply by its history or by its abuses. We Catholics would do well to reflect on that, I think.
To read more about the latest lawsuit against the Church of Scientology regarding the coerced abortions and other human rights abuses inflicted on their Sea Org members, please see http://www.scribd.com/doc/26348351/SAC-Revised
"Also you should have been more understanding and aware that many who no longer associate themselves with the Church are part of a growing Protestant movement something you Church has experienced itself many centuries ago. At a time when you were burning witches and torturing heretics during the Inquisition.
Yet for some reason you fail to note the Historical parallel.
Why is that?"
Why do you defend murder, human trafficking, family disconnection and torture?
1. Your evasive stance based upon actions occurring over 400 years ago, does not strengthen your argument, it only supports your glib viewpoint. Author this is a typical Scientology mindset resulting in logical and academic errors. Attack never defend, right?
2.You also know very little about the Spanish Inquisition, and sound like a typical OSA bug. Don't preach to Catholics about their own history, we unlike Scientology, keep our sacred documents in most hotel bureaus.
3. I don't even need this third point, that's how much you fail, at being an L Ron Hubbard Troll. Fail.
"Also you should have been more understanding and aware that many who no longer associate themselves with the Church are part of a growing Protestant movement"
Wow, what an unbelievable pile of bs
Jens Jensen and Kim Cod are two (or possibly one) obvious scientologists. Kims comment is especially ironic as CoS members are notorious for abusing flagging systems to get critical comments deleted. Some very good points have been made in this article, but scientology has always been a two faced operation and they will say anything to get people off their backs. The more ex-scientologists that come forward with their stories the less convincing those who are still in sound. Quoting policies contrary to what former members are claiming is no longer enough Scientology! You must prove that what you quote is actually being followed through, none of this will go away until you do.
RJ, I agree.
Why do you publish an abusive comment on Scientology ("the ronbot hunter"?) Is it only abusive comments on Catholic Church that you are not accepting?
Ok, finally some kind of admission of rightness of Scientology from Mr. Sly. However I am still drawn to the singular fact that Randy's focus is on the detractors' spin but he seems to utterly disregard the millions of lives bettered by Scientology.
Have you interviewed any winning Scientologist Randy? And by the way, why focus on attacks on another religion; what about the Godless era and materialistic ingression that is pervading our western culture? Wouldn't this be the first priority of the Catholic Online and hence yours?
Ex-scientologists out number active scientologists about 5 to 1,from that you can tell that when we say that it is a Godless cult of greed, we have the numbers to prove our claims.
$cientology kills, even its own members.
It destroys families and causes many to kill themselves. Because some don't have the strength to fight Ronbots that won't let you leave the Godless cult of greed.
You have been warned.
THE RONBOT HUNTER
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
You must be careful when attacking another religion that you don't create a situation where you have the pot calling the kettle black.
It is not "Scientology" that supports forced abortions, just like it isn't Christianity or more specifically Roman Catholicism that supports pedophilia, yet you fail to make this distinction.
In fact if you had bothered to read Dianetics the Modern Science of Health instead of merely flipped through it. This would have become evident.
Also you should have been more understanding and aware that many who no longer associate themselves with the Church are part of a growing Protestant movement something you Church has experienced itself many centuries ago. At a time when you were burning witches and torturing heretics during the Inquisition.
Yet for some reason you fail to note the Historical parallel.
Why is that?