I cannot help but wonder who we have become as a people in the span of a generation and what it means for our country.
The geometry of Notre Dame is complex and passionate yet ordered and beautiful. It raises our minds toward heaven and orients our relationship to God and each other.
KNOXVILLE, TN (Catholic Online) - I buried my mother in December and my sister, the youngest of seven, in January. I had a surprising experience at their prayer services. Being the eldest, I led the Rosary at both services. Both were filled to capacity, standing room only at my sister’s. Many people recited the Rosary with me at my mother’s service. Our voices filled the room. At my sister’s service, only a faint, lone voice joined my wife and I.
The only noticeable difference between the two crowds was the average age. Although closer in age to my sister’s friends, I found many of them alien and difficult to relate to, as though they were from a different culture. As a result of this experience, I cannot help but wonder who we have become as a people in the span of a generation and what it means for our country.
I believe George Weigel gives us a clue in his book, The Cube and the Cathedral. In this book, George Weigle contrasts the culture that built the famous Cathedral of Notre Dame de Paris with the culture that built La Grande Arche in 1990. Weigel depicts the French arch as a massive cube. Its plain geometry reminds me of something cold and barren--a world without God. It is meant to be secular humanism’s monument to human rights and fraternity, ideals reminiscent of the French Revolution in 1789 (although we best not forget the Reign of Terror which erupted four years later).
The Cathedral of Notre Dame stands in direct contrast to the Cube. The geometry of Notre Dame is complex and passionate yet ordered and beautiful. It raises our minds toward heaven and orients our relationship to God and each other. Although Weigel’s contrasts give us a clue to who we have become as a people, I believe certain similarities between the Cube and an architectural movement called “Bauhaus” give us another important clue.
I see strong similarities between the architecture of the Cube and the box-like features of Bauhaus architecture. In addition, some ideas within the Bauhaus movement and secular humanism also seem similar. For instance, I find that Bauhaus architecture emphasizes industrial mechanization while the Cube emphasizes bureaucratic mechanization. Thus, it seems that Bauhaus and secular humanism are primarily concerned with systems and control, utility and expedience.
Such ideas can become easily perverted when applied to human persons. And that is what history indicates. The Bauhaus movement took hold in Germany and Russia during the early Twentieth century, and I believe its ideas contributed to the horrors of the Nazi extermination camps and Stalin’s purges. Consequently, I believe that these similarities should be a warning to us about the potential dangers of secular humanism, which produced the Cube.
Although I do not know if we have become like the kind of people who lived in and produced states like Nazi Germany or Communist Russia, I do know that our ideas and beliefs influence the kind of people we become and the kind of culture and state that we produce. This means that we cannot divorce our religious ideas and beliefs from society and politics as secular humanists desire. George Weigel says “. . . great social and political questions are, more often than not, ultimately theological in nature” (Cube 142).
The theologian David Hart writes, “A culture--a civilization--is only as great as the religious ideas that animate it” (qtd. in Cube 166). The philosopher Jürgen Habermas is even more specific. He writes, “Christianity, and nothing else, is the ultimate foundation of liberty, conscience, human rights, and democracy” (qtd. in First Things 28). When I reflect on the experience that I had at my mother and sister’s prayer services and the connection between secular humanism and brutal, totalitarian states from the past, I feel an urgent need to pray that history does not repeat itself in our country.
References:
1. Neuhaus, Richard “Secularizations,” First Things, Feb. 2009
2. Weigel, George The Cube and the Cathedral, Basic Books, 2005
-----
Michael Terheyden is a Catholic because he believes that truth is real, that it is beautiful and good, and that the fullness of truth is in the Catholic Church. He is greatly blessed to share his Catholic faith with his beautiful wife, Dorothy. They have four grown children and three grandchildren.
- - -
Deacon Keith Fournier asks that you join with us and help in this vital mission by sending this article to your family, friends, and neighbors and adding our link (www.catholic.org) to your own website, blog or social network. Let us broadcast, we are PROUD TO BE CATHOLIC!
Comments
There is one statement at Wikepedia that says that (quote taken from Wikepedia)
"Curiously, however, some Bauhaus influences lived on in Nazi Germany.
"Hitler's chief engineer, Fritz Todt, began opening the new autobahn (highways) in 1935, many of the bridges and service stations were "bold examples of modernism" - among those submitting designs was Mies van der Rohe.[16]"
Obviously they the Nazi's were influenced and borrowed this style.
Jean | 7/21/2009
My facts and dates are different from those stated in the comments by John Grimes. My information is as follows:
The Bauhaus Architectural movement began under Walter Gropius in 1919 at Weimar. Meyer took it over in 1928, and Mies van der Rohe led the movement in 1930. The Nazis shut it down in 1933 because it had become heavily influenced by the communists. World War II began around 1939. While the Nazis rejected Communism, I believe that the ruthless utility, expedience and efficiency evident in the successful organization of the Nazi death camps during WWII reflect fundamental ideas of the Bauhaus movement such as industrial mechanization, systems and control.
Furthermore, the Bauhaus movement began in the USSR around 1920 under the name of “Vkhutemas.” Stalin took power around 1928 and began his purge to liquidate the “Kulaks” and brutally eliminate all other opposition in the 1930’s. I believe that Stalin’s purges reflect bureaucratic mechanization, utility, expedience, and efficiency--all ideas fundamental to the Bauhaus movement.
Like you, John Grimes, I do not appreciate “sloppy intellectual nonsense.” Unlike you, I also do not appreciate sloppy, bitter accusations. They tend to discredit the accuser.
I pray that God will give me the grace to be careful with my facts and even more careful with my accusations.
Michael Terheyden | 7/21/2009
The Bauhaus movement somehow contributed to Nazi death camps and Stalinist purges? You have to be kidding. Both totalitarian movements began either before or at the same moment Gropius was initiating the Bauhaus school and couldn't possibly have been influenced in any way by him or his ideas. What is more, his school was forced to move from Dessau to Berlin in 1932 because of the Nazis; eventually, it was the Nazis who closed the Bauhaus school.
This kind of sloppy intellectual nonsense can discredit Catholic thought generally when it appears on a proudly Catholic site like yours.
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, antisocial behavior such as "spamming" and "trolling," or other inappropriate comments or material will not be posted on Catholic Online. Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of service. While Catholic Online invites robust discussion, we maintain the right to not print material that is patently false in its claims concerning the teaching of the Magisterium of the Catholic Church, overtly anti-Catholic or which, in the opinion of the moderator, are intended to mislead readers as to what the Catholic Church teaches. Comments DO NOT necessarily reflect the opinion or views of Catholic Online.