LONG BEACH, CA (Catholic Online) - The people in today's Gospel are divided over Jesus. They're not sure what to make of him. Some say he is the promised Moses-like prophet who is to come. Others are convinced he is Israel's long awaited Messiah and King. Still others are thoroughly skeptical. He cannot be the Messiah, they argue. He's from Nazareth. The Messiah will be born in Bethlehem and he will be a descendent of David. They want to arrest him but they are fearful of the admiring crowds.
 
In their rejection of Jesus, this latter group is obviously wrong but for the right reasons. It is true the Messiah will be born in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2). It is true that he will be of the line of King David. However, they didn't bother to find out if in fact Jesus of Nazareth fits the bill, which of course he eminently does, having been born in Bethlehem and being of the house of David. Rather, they choose to remain ignorant of the facts and as a result, they reject him out of hand.

Since Wednesday the world has been abuzz with the stunning announcement of the election of the first pope from the "New World." And that is not the only "first." The 266th Roman Pontiff is also the first Latino pope (although he is the son of Italian immigrants), the first Argentinian pope, the first Jesuit pope and the first pope to take the name Francis. The announcement that the Cardinal electors had chosen Cardinal Josė Mario Bergoglio of Buenos Aires to succeed Benedict XVI took everyone by surprise, even the so-called Vaticanologists!

But, habemus papam! We have a pope and this is truly a gaudium magnum, a great joy! Not everyone, however, is rejoicing as heartily as they should. Just as there was division over Jesus 2000 years ago, there is division over this new Vicar of Christ on earth.

What do I mean?

Those dippy people who were hoping that the next pope would somehow cancel out 2000 years of Church teaching on all the so-called hot button issues of abortion, contraception, same sex marriage (sic), women's ordination (sic) and the like, are obviously displeased with the new pope.

When people asked me who I thought would succeed Benedict XVI, I simply said, "He will be Catholic!" The fact that Pope Francis is Catholic is a disappointment to these confused and unfortunate souls. The changes in Church teaching they were hoping for will never materialize.

Then there are those who are concerned about the new pope's "style," for lack of a better term. These are the people who pay close attention to what the pope wears. It is true that Pope Francis departed from established protocol at his first appearance on the loggia overlooking St. Peter's square.

Pope Francis was not clad in the usual "choir dress" that popes wear. Instead, he wore the simple white cassock (the "house dress" of the pope) and eschewed the "rochet" or surplice and the familiar shoulder length, red silk "mozetta." He didn't even wear the elaborately embroidered papal stole until it was placed over his shoulders for the urbi et orbi blessing.

These omissions are for some the equivalent of an ecclesiastical "wardrobe malfunction" and are seen as perhaps signaling a troubling break with tradition. I understand these concerns but I do not think we should make too much of them. This is, after all, the pope who took the name of the "poor man of Assisi" who lived a life of poverty and simplicity. I do not think we should be troubled by the Franciscan tone of the papacy of Papa Francesco. On the contrary, we should all be edified.

There are other concerns, perhaps more serious ones, concerning the liturgy. Pope emeritus Benedict XVI in the eight years of his pontificate did so much to emphasize faithfulness to the liturgical norms and the importance of beauty in carrying out the Church's liturgical rites. For this we all owe a huge debt of gratitude to our beloved German pope.

Some fear that our new Holy Father will undo these achievements made by Benedict and move toward a more simplistic approach to the liturgy. In this regard, Pope Francis' installation Mass on Tuesday, the Solemnity of St. Joseph, will be telling.

In the meantime, I would make the following points.

First, it is unwise and even unjust to make comparisons between the personalities as well as the liturgical proclivities of Benedict and Francis. They are very different men who come from very different backgrounds and cultures. They are both, needless to say, Catholic!

Second, while the Apostolic See is solely responsible for the regulation of the Sacred Liturgy, we should not expect that Pope Francis will issue new decrees that will substantively change the Church's liturgical norms or revoke any of the "Benedictine" reforms (e.g., Summorum Pontificum).

Third, Pope Francis has repeatedly ...