CORPUS CHRISTI, TX (Catholic Online) - In addition to the four fundamental principles of the Church's social doctrine which we have reviewed in prior articles--the dignity of the human person, the common good, subsidiarity (and participation), and solidarity--there are also four fundamental moral values that ought to inspire and guide the entire enterprise of social life: truth, freedom, justice, and love.  In this article, we will review the moral value of truth and its significance in social life from the perspective of the Church's social doctrine.  Later articles will handle the other values.

"Men and women have the specific duty to move always towards the truth, to respect it, and bear responsible witness to it." (Compendium, No. 198)  "Suffer us not," wrote T. S. Eliot in his poem "Ash Wednesday," "to mock ourselves with falsehood."

We have a moral duty to move towards the truth.  This recognizes that we have a duty to conform ourselves to reality, to what is, as truth is our conformity--whether it be our intellect or our life--to reality.  Veritas, goes the philosophic axiom, est adaequatio intellectus et rei: truth is the conformity of our intellect with reality. 

We might go further than this and say that the value of truth is the conformity of one's entire life, including one's social life, to reality, to what is.  Veritas est adaequatio vitae et rei.  Truth is the beacon toward which we aim personally and in our social relations. 

The value of truth is important to apply in our life in common, in our social life.  "The more people and social groups strive to resolve social problems according to truth, the more they distance themselves from abuses and act in accordance with the objective demands of morality." (Compendium, No. 198)  We cannot build a society on a mock truth, on a non-committal shrug of the shoulders to truth. Nor can we build a society on a mock question like Pontius Pilate's question, "What is truth?" and then not stay for an answer or supply an answer of our own.

To be sure, the quest for truth is not easy.  "Falsehood is so easy," George Eliot pseudonymously wrote in her book Adam Bede, "truth so difficult."  And with the poet Virgil, we can recall the reality that it is either to descend to the falsehoods of Averno, than to climb to the summit of truth:  Facilis descensus Averno.

But the difficulty of the quest ought not to discourage us: veritas Christi urget nos.  The truth of Christ urges us on. "I hate and abhor falsehood," the Psalmist wrote in words surely uttered by Christ in his lifetime, "but your law do I love." (Psalm 119 [118]:163)

This suggestion that we are to "move always" to the truth suggests that this duty is never over.  In a certain sense we are becoming in the truth.  Only one person can say "I am the truth, the way, and the life," (John 14:6) and even He, in his humanity, "grew in wisdom and statute, and in favor with God and men." (Luke 2:52).

We can therefore say that, while there is no gradualism in the truth, there is gradualism in our acquisition or comprehension of the truth.  Our getting to the truth is subject to the law of gradualism.  This is just part of the human condition.

Truth's demand is that one's entire life must be engaged in the desire to have greater conformity with reality.  We must, in the words of Shakespeare in his play The Rape of Lucrece, continue to "unmask falsehood, and bring truth to light."  While on this earth we are on pilgrimage to the truth, and we must be willing to discard those mental notions, though we may hold them dear, when we learn that we have held them in error.  We must, further, learn to take up truths when we come to recognize them, as difficult and as inconvenient as they may seem.

While the striving for truth is never over, we must not despair that truth is something entirely unachievable.  Though in one sense we are always striving for truth, yet in another we can also say that we have a hold on some truths.  This is particularly true with respect to the truths of the Faith.

The notion of truth entertained by the Church is that it is an objective reality.  Truth is not what we make of it.  Intellectual subjectivism or moral relativism is out of the question.  Truth is not the modernist notion of adaequatio realis mentis et vitae, only the conformity of our life with the truth in our mind. 

The value of truth is not internal integrity or sincerity, though the value of truth certainly does not oppose these.  But fundamentally, truth implies something objective, something which masters us and which we never master; hence, it is something that can make moral demands of ...