Guest Opinion: Purportedly 'Gay' Proposition 8 Judge Should Recuse Himself Comments
'Any decision favoring plaintiffs in this case will be permanently marred and universally viewed as stemming from Judge Walker’s personal biases.' Continue Reading
31 - 40 of 47 Comments
Leave a Comment
Most Popular
Pope Francis says atheists can do good and go to heaven too! Read More
There's the problem! Americans are out of touch with scientific consensus on climate change Read More
Culture of Corruption: Why Obama's misuse of Marines is wrong Read More
Bill Donohue, Catholic League, Disclose Fight with the IRS, Demonstrate Courage Read More
Receiving the Eucharist: I Have Decided to Kneel For Jesus Read More
Daily Readings
Reading 1, Sirach 6:5-17
A kindly turn of speech attracts new friends, a courteous ... Read More
Psalm, Psalms 119:12, 16, 18, 27, 34, 35
Blessed are you, Yahweh, teach me your will! Read More
Gospel, Mark 10:1-12
After leaving there, he came into the territory of Judaea and ... Read More
Saint of the Day
St. David I of Scotland
May 24: David, the youngest son of Scotland’s virtuous queen, (Saint) ... Read More
Marketplace
Heaven Speaks About Consecrated Souls
Souls who are consecrated are addressed with great love and ... Read More
DGP 100% COTTON T-SHIRTS<>DIVINE MERCY, O L GUADALUPE, CUSTOM DESIGNS. Read More



















Right-wing Christian propaganda at its best
How about Catholic judges removing themselves from social issues cases as well? They are biased by the Church's demands to think their way or be denied communion. Let's get them to recuse themselves from these cases and then let's talk about Judge Walker.
Shlomo and anyone MikeKSF
Im not fighting with you but if you get the chance go over to
http://www.peoplecanchange.com/
has much to do with this decision.
This is a ridiculous demand. Clearly a heterosexual judge will have his or her own biases. Should they look for an asxexual judge?
“He also allowed plaintiffs a parade of ‘expert’ witnesses who viciously maligned Christians and other observers of natural and historic sexual morality as ‘prejudiced,’ ‘bigoted’ and ‘homophobic.’
Actually , they proved it. They are all those things.
Recuse himself? Take out the homosexual because you think he will support the homosexual side and put in a heterosexual so he can back the heterosexual side? Or are you suggesting only heterosexuals can be honest? Because if you are, wow, can that be proven wrong with out any effort. This judge has show in his history on the court to be above approach.
Uh yeah, because it would be soooo much more fair if this case was decided by a straight judge with a personal agenda.
This is near hate speech, inciting violence against gays and the judiciary. Shame on you for printing this without questioning the false claims of Liberty Council.
So what? If he were straight would the gays be asking him to recluse himself? This is such a dumb argument for this organization to make, as a Catholic I am appalled by Liberty's stance on this. Did Jesus discriminate? No!!
I have read articles with a few lies, but this one tops the list by far. It is unbelieable the lies spewed in this article. Nothing of what was stated in it is based on fact. However, people with so rooted religious views do not live in a fact-based reality, so I shouldnt be surprised. VERY disgusting and hateful article.