Some of the smallest U.S. states get the most in federal funds
Some states received a disproportionate amount of funding relative to the amount they put in annually
The federal government took billions of dollars it received in
corporate, income and property taxes from each state and redistributed
the money programs in each state. However -- a review of federal data
indicates that many states, considering their size and the taxes they
paid, received a disproportionate amount of funding.
No state in the U.S. received more money per person from the federal government than Alaska. The state had the second-highest figure for defense spending in 2010, at $7,337.59 per capita.
States such as Alaska and Virginia received more than $15,000 per person from the federal government, even after subtracting the billions the state spent on income tax. This figure is nearly two-and-a-half times the amount received per person after taxes in states like Nevada, which is generally regarded as one of the poorest states in the country.
According to the Web site 24/7, these are the states that get the most federal money.
Federal spending per capita net of income taxes: $15,197
Total federal spending per capita: $17,762
Federal income taxes per capita: $2,565
No state in the U.S. received more money per person from the federal government than Alaska. The state had the second-highest figure for defense spending in 2010, at $7,337.59 per capita. The federal government also allocated a great deal toward wages and salaries in Alaska, $5,709.52 per capita.
Federal spending per capita net of income taxes: $14,201
Total federal spending per capita: $17,008
Federal income taxes per capita: $2,807
Virginia received more than $136 billion in federal funds in 2010, receiving more than 12 percent of the total Department of Defense procurement spending, which was the second-highest proportion in the country, behind California.
Federal spending per capita net of income taxes: $13,723
Total federal spending per capita: $16,673
Federal income taxes per capita: $2,950
Maryland had the fifth-highest federal spending per capita from the Defense Department as Maryland has 11 military bases. Maryland received more spending per capita in nonmilitary programs than any other. The state's proximity to the capital is likely a major factor.
Federal spending per capita net of income taxes: $13,709
Total federal spending per capita: $15,331
The Hawaiian Islands have 11 military bases, contributing to the country's highest per capita federal expenditure from the Department of Defense in 2010. Along with a large number of military personnel on the government payroll, Hawaii also had the highest federal salaries and wages.
5. New Mexico
Federal spending per capita net of income taxes: $12,399
Total federal spending per capita: $13,578
Federal income taxes per capita: $1,179
New Mexico received the third-highest procurement spending per capita in the U.S. at $3,641.68. A significant component of this spending was under the category of non-defense agency spending for the Department of Energy.
Federal spending per capita net of income taxes: $12,129
Total federal spending per capita: $13,198
Federal income taxes per capita: $1,069
The federal government gave Kentucky more than $7,000 per person on direct payments, which included retirement and disability benefits, unemployment benefits and student assistance - all large programs. Medicare benefits accounted for nearly 57 percent of such payments.
Federal spending per capita net of income taxes: $10,656
Total federal spending per capita: $11,820
Federal income taxes per capita: $1,164
Alabama comes in second for the amount of spending per capita, $3,761 on retirement and disability. The Cotton State also ranks seventh for procurement spending per capita, 78 percent of which was defense spending, and large parts of which also included the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Agriculture.
8. West Virginia
Federal spending per capita net of income taxes: $10,568
Total federal spending per capita: $11,609
Federal income taxes per capita: $1,041
West Virginia is the only state in the top 10 where federal spending on defense was not a significant contributor. West Virginia only ranked 48th for federal defense spending - $609 per capita. A large portion of federal spending in West Virginia, almost 16 percent, was for Medicare benefits, slightly more than the national rate of 15.6 percent.
Federal spending per capita net of income taxes: $10,506
Total federal spending per capita: $15,662
Federal income taxes per capita: $5,156
Connecticut received almost 50 percent more government funding per capita than the national average. In 2010, Connecticut was awarded $11.1 billion in military procurement contracts, giving the state the fourth-highest per capita federal defense expenditure.
10. North Dakota
Federal spending per capita net of income taxes: $10,438
Total federal spending per capita: $12,930
Federal income taxes per capita: $2,492
With the third-smallest population in the U.S., North Dakota's federal spending per capita was understandably larger than more populous states. North Dakota ranked third in the country for receiving Direct payments other than retirement and disability.
© 2012, Catholic Online. Distributed by NEWS CONSORTIUM.
- - -
Pope Benedict XVI's Prayer Intentions for January 2013
General Intention: The Faith of Christians. That in this Year of Faith Christians may deepen their knowledge of the mystery of Christ and witness joyfully to the gift of faith in him.
Missionary Intention: Middle Eastern Christians. That the Christian communities of the Middle East, often discriminated against, may receive from the Holy Spirit the strength of fidelity and perseverance.
Keywords: Federal Government, military spending, retirement, Medicare
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Business & Economics News
- Web developer: Earn $60,000 a year - without college degree or debt
- China, India, Brazil could dominate global investment by 2030
- Unemployment in U.S. comes roaring back - in a big way
- Criminally unfair? Why disgraced Enron CEO Skilling could see freedom sooner than you think
- Berkshire Hathaway Inc. hits first quarter record profit at 51 percent
- China and Japan now hold record amounts of Obama debt
- Does shift to mobile mean Facebook's salad days are done? Not at all
- U.S. annual growth rate slowest since 1929, start of Great Depression
- Prosperity gap between races in U.S. widened during recession
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?
Disclaimer: The columns, articles, advertisers claims and any other features provided on Catholic Online Business & Economics are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Catholic Online and there is no implied endorsement by Catholic Online of any advice or trading strategy.